User talk:MuZemike

Or: The War Room

We all know what we can and cannot do in the War Room, correct, gentlemen?

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by .

This is MuZemike's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11: 5 days

Resident Evil

Duly taken to (this) AfD, thanks for the heads up though. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 22:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Badagnani RFC

Hello, MuZemike. Eugene2x (talk · contribs) files WP:Requests for comment/User conduct on Badagnani (talk · contribs). Since you've known him for his behaviors, your input on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Badagnani would appreciated. Thanks--Caspian blue 01:52, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Can't look at it right now, but I'll try to comment when I get a chance to sit down and look at it more closely. MuZemike 02:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of 5x5=25

I'm confused as to why you think that my article on the 5x5=25 exhibition of 1921 is worthy of deletion. You stated that "I can only find a trivial mention in a Socialist newspaper here, but nothing else. Notability not established, unless offline sources can be found." Searching on Google for "5x5=25" and "Rodchenko", for example, I find it mentioned in many articles on Constructivism in good quality newspapers, art galleries, and some journals. By searching Google Books, it also returns quite a number of results.Jimjamjak (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Add them in, then! I could be wrong. MuZemike 17:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that notability is not established through one's perception of a subject, but through the amount of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources as I have mentioned before.

I quite understand that. I think that given the current recreation of this exhibition in the largest art museum in the UK, it is not just me who thinks it might be notable. I was slightly put out because I didn't feel I had been given a chance to barely start the article before it was tagged for deletion.Jimjamjak (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also remember that if you are contesting the deletion to please remove the Proposed Deletion tags from the article. That shows that the proposed deletion has been contested. It still, however, may be sent to Articles for deletion for a community discussion. Hope that helps out more. MuZemike 17:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help here.Jimjamjak (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AbsoluteTelnet DRV

Hi! Thanks for the additional comments on Wikipedia:DRV#AbsoluteTelnet. I left further comments on the DRV page regarding AbsoluteTelnet in print. I found four print sources that mention AbsoluteTelnet. Is this the kind of thing you're looking for? You said you might consider a relist if I was able to find other source material, particularly print sources. Also, could you explain to me what "this is not AFD round 2" means? I see you repeat that in a number of DRVs but I'm not sure what it means. --Brian Pence (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"This is not AFD round 2" normally means that you're either trying to re-argue the points made at the relevant AFD or are making arguments that are normally made at AFD. DRV is different in that it is used either because the closing administrator may have made a faulty judgment in deleting (or keeping) an article at AFD or via CSD, or if new information pops up after the AFD closure which may have resulted in a different result in the AFD if presented then.

I would be for relisting it now that it looks like you have something there (I'll change appropriately on the DRV page) for notability. Hopefully, everyone else can do the same.

Hope this helps out. MuZemike 17:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5x5=25

I see you 2nd'd a prod on 5x5=25, that prod was contested by the article's creator so it has been moved to AFD here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5x5=25, you may want to add your comments.

DYK for Rufus (Street Fighter)

On 27 March, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rufus (Street Fighter), which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 01:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

ta very (RNLB Mary Stanford) ClemMcGann (talk) 23:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ratchet & Clank Future: A Crack in Time

Could take a look at the Ratchet & Clank Future: A Crack in Time page. I copied some stuff from my sub-page, but I need you to add more if needed. — HK22 \my contributions/ ^{(my talk)} 02:24, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]