Jump to content

User talk:68.236.218.104

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 81.158.207.21 (talk) at 08:26, 1 April 2009 (DD: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

You are not a funny vandal. Familyguyfan87 (talk) 03:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. FireFox 19:44, 9 November 2005 (UTC) [reply]

March 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to John Calvin. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Samtheboy (t/c) 14:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew Jackson, you will be blocked from editing. AlphaEta T / C 19:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Martin Van Buren

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Martin Van Buren worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Keith D 21:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mother ship. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 15:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Noah, you will be blocked from editing. Oda Mari (talk) 15:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Peregrine Falcon, you will be blocked from editing. Oda Mari (talk) 15:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to John Quincy Adams. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ryan Postlethwaite 19:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to John Quincy Adams. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. – Gurch 18:45, 15 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Zachary Taylor. – Gurch 18:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. —Cryptic 18:50, 15 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Thanksgiving. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Thanksgiving, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
[reply]


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Electrical telegraph, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Electrical telegraph was changed by 68.236.218.104 (c) (t) deleting 17280 characters on 2007-12-14T15:18:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew Johnson, you will be blocked from editing. --Oxymoron83 19:10, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew Johnson, you will be blocked from editing. --Oxymoron83 18:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew Johnson, you will be blocked from editing. --Oxymoron83 18:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Oxymoron83 18:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Your recent edit to William McKinley (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Books of the Bible has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 15:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Books of the Bible, you will be blocked from editing. Raymond Giggs 02:26, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Grover Cleveland, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Grover Cleveland was changed by 68.236.218.104 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-02-04T15:16:19+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

The recent edit you made to Grover Cleveland constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 15:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)) [reply]

April 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Pennsylvania Turnpike, you will be blocked from editing. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Mexico City has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. KerotanLeave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 17:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Your edit to Mexico City on April 22, 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mexico City. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Captin Shmit (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Mexico City. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. KerotanLeave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 17:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC) [reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this IP address will be subject to a longer block.

--Bhadani (talk) 17:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC) [reply]

May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Jimmy Carter. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DoubleBlue (Talk) 18:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to The Bahamas. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StephenBuxton (talk) 17:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Dominican Republic.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. StephenBuxton (talk) 17:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexf42 17:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Cynthia McKinney has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. It Is Me Here (talk) 13:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ruby Bridges. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  JGHowes  talk 14:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Gottlieb Daimler has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Techman224Talk 16:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DD

Drop dead.