Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fuzzyhair2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Neskaya (talk | contribs) at 15:21, 1 April 2009 (Oppose). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Nomination

Voice your opinion (talk page) (1/4/09); Scheduled to end 14:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

fuzzyhair2 (talk · contribs) – Vote me in!


Okay, fine. I have a wierd name. So what? That can't prevent me from sucess. I think I should be like an admin. I will edit and create pages like neva before! I lot of people like me. I think you should too. --Fuzzyhair2 (talk) 14:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: I want to take part in creating pages and preventing "bad language". There are a lot of kids out there that use Wikipedia. It pops up in almost every search engine.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: My best contribution to Wikipedia is the ecomotions. I added plenty of new ones.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: I hane not been in any conflicts over editing. Swearing over Wikipedia is stressful. I had enough of the day. I wish to delete them and notify the contributer.

General comments


Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Fuzzyhair2 before commenting.

Discussion


Support


Oppose
  1. Oppose. Couple dozen edits, total. Needs a couple thousand more and several more months of content-building and admin-related experience. Apparently unfamiliar with our policies of citing sources. Basically, a "not now" case. Tan | 39 15:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose per not now. Thanks for the enthusiasm Fuzzyhair, but you'll need a lot more experience at Wikipedia before applying for adminship. Please see this page for more information. All the best, FlyingToaster 15:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Not now. --Neskaya talk 15:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Neutral