User talk:CanadianNine

Re to message

Heh, not pathetic at all. Actually, I asked about two weeks ago to see how I could change my signature around. I'm afraid I'm probably your worst explainer for coding, so I would suggest you ask the question at the Wikipedia Help Desk; which will answer all of your Wikipedia based questions. They will probably be able to give you an answer faster, as well as more clear than me!

As for the rollbacking status, I would recommend you wait at least a week. I know that undo button is a pain, but the longer your here, the better chance you can get it. I started this account in June of '08, but never really did anything on it till October. About a few days in of my Wikipedia fiasco in October, (I think I had around 200 Edits) then I applied for rollback, and I believe they are most willingly to give it out. And if you are denied, you can always request it again after a few weeks. Just don't disappoint them, or something nasty may come your way. ;)

Hope this helps, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Renaissancee (talk) 02:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan Mcfarlane (disambiguation)

All three names that you have on the disambiguation page lead to the same person. CardinalDan (talk) 03:19, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. GARDEN 14:29, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ACC Account Creation Interface Confirmation

I have applied for an account on the ACC Account Creation Interface, and am creating a confirmation message as requested on the site. CanadianNine 16:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanked by author

Hi. Though page blanking is usually vandalism and needs to be reverted, it is worth looking first at the page history, because quite often the author has blanked his own page, as was the case with Elemore Boys Fc just now. In those cases the best thing is to tag it {{db-author}}. It can be confusing for an author who realises his page is inappropriate and blanks it, if his page is at once restored and he is accused of vandalism for the blanking and told it was unconstructive. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I should not have been so hasty in my revert and warn. I was kind of breezing through with Huggle, but I will be more thorough and diligent in the future. Again, my apologies, CanadianNine 15:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elemore Boys Fc

You recently reverted the blanking of this article, and warned the user who blanked the page about vandalism. The user was the sole author of this page, and as such, his blanking of the page is interpreted as a good faith edit, asking for deletion of the page. Please check the edit history of pages in the future, before reverting and warning other innocent users. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 15:44, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I was using Huggle and did not take the time to correctly check the page history. I will be more careful in future. Thanks for the reality check, CanadianNine 15:54, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bloody Fun Day

Thank you for the GA review :) The sources, though not ideal, do reflect the best of what's out there (Jay is Games for instance has some recognition as a good source for reviews from others in the industry). Thanks again. Someone another 19:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Tavares

Both Nurumsook and I appreciate the review, and the comments. FA is a consideration of ours, and it would be an interesting case for FAC, I think. Thanks! Reso lute 22:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congradulations

Congradulations on rollback. Hopefully it will become of some use. :) Renaissancee (talk) 23:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re to message

I think that's perfectly fine! I myself haven't really been active in those areas as well, but I suppose I should be. You should would be perfectly fine. The only requirement to vote in AfD's and the others are to have a registered Wikipedia account. :) Renaissancee (talk) 03:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK article length

Just to remind you that the DYK length test is characters of readable prose, not words: see Wikipedia:Did you know#DYK rules. Deforestation in Costa Rica is easily over the length requirement. Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 00:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]