User talk:Justmeherenow

Archive 1

Awesome

Thanks, looks great. Khoikhoi 01:29, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD not done right?

It looks like you have not actually completed the Lolo Soetoro AfD nomination. I don't see it listed on the general AfD page, which is probably why so few people have voted.

Moreover, your inclusion of the whole prior merge discussion is very confusing. Looking through it, I initially thought the oppose/support comments were about this AfD rather than from the prior discussion. It would be much better if you simply used a link to the prior discussion and let the discussion here be current opinions. LotLE×talk 01:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK Lulu, I'll try. Thanks!

\sim

Justmeherenow ( ) 01:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I completed the nomination and moved the link to the prior discussion to a prominent location at the top of the AfD page. LotLE×talk 02:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thx Lulu

\sim

Justmeherenow ( ) 02:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

I hope this makes you happy: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable distant you waht sex

Family of Barack Obama

By the way, 2 to the 11 power is only 2048. Agricolae (talk) 06:29, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ancestors of American Presidents- First Authoritative Edition.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ancestors of American Presidents- First Authoritative Edition.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama Segments Under InfoBox

When you converted {{BarackObamaSegmentsUnderInfoBox}} to a use Navbox, you destroyed the embedded hCard microformat (see these changes). Please fix it (let me know if you don't know how). Thank you. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 17:01, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What would you suggest, sir? Just tips me hat but then ?on thoght bows deeply 17:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing. I thought this had been fixed, but it hasn't. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 17:33, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Easterly named to FP Top 100 Intellectuals.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Easterly named to FP Top 100 Intellectuals.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mosmof (talk) 00:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Phil Fisher.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Phil Fisher.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scrollbar on political positions articles

Not sure what you're trying to accomplish with the scrollbar table of contents on the political positions pages, but on my Firefox 3 browser, it completely mangles the formatting. The ToC comes out after the first section has already started, and the text and pictures of the first few sections are squeezed all the way to the right of the ToC. And even if a scrollbar works, we're not supposed to use it, because articles then don't print correctly. Wasted Time R (talk) 20:08, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd thought it legit (somebody had it installed on the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign page), apparently designed to fill in white space when a TOC's very long. But since you say they're discouraged (eg not filling in the text comparable to that of a printed magazine on your browser), I'll revert. Just tips me hat but then 〜on thoght bows deeply 20:18, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your other recent change to a bunch of articles, "align navbox with table of contents, abutting infobox", has messed many of them up in Firefox 3 as well. In order for three-across elements, the table of contents gets badly squished into a narrow width, rendering it virtually unreadable. Wasted Time R (talk) 21:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Layout changes

Why are you adding layout tables to so many articles? Tables are semantic elements designed to hold tabulated data only, not tools for laying out objects. These additions harm accessibility and seem utterly pointless. Please explain. -- Scjessey (talk) 21:54, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. From the guidelines, "Often images are placed in an article by using a quirk of table rendering. Because a table can be floated to the left or right side of the screen, it has become common practice to use a simple one-celled table to place an image in a particular part of the screen." Just tips me hat but then 〜on thoght bows deeply 21:59, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a great explanation if you were applying this formatting to images, but you are doing it to infoboxes. And even if this guideline applied, it still introduces accessibility issues (which applies to any table that is not being used to present tabulated data). -- Scjessey (talk) 03:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Juanita_Pulsipher_Brooks.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Juanita_Pulsipher_Brooks.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:37, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008 - Obama article probation

For claiming a consensus to move Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories to a watered down title when there was none:

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Barack Obama/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- Jehochman ^Talk 14:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama 2009 presidential inauguration‎

I am not understanding your whitespace issue at Barack Obama 2009 presidential inauguration‎. What browser are you talking about and what is your screen resolution? You also seem to be misunderstanding my cramming issue. It has nothing to do with right and left. It involves whether the edit button is at thetop of the appropriate section instead of crammed down below infoboxes.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 22:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Various computers and/or their setups see the same WP page various ways, of course. Anyway, with the nav template at the top of the second section.... Well, just look at the rough chart below (dotted lines represent white space):

lede.lede.lede.lede.lede.infobox

..................................infobox

SECTION HED.."edit".infox

first.sect.text.text.text.navbox

With the nav template directly under the infobox, however, the layout looks to me like this:

lede.lede.lede.lede.lede.infobox

SECTION HED.."edit".infobox

first.sect.text.text.text.infobox

first.sect.text.text.text.navbox

Just tips me hat but then 〜on thought bows deeply … 03:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Ancestors of American Presidents- First Authoritative Edition.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ancestors of American Presidents- First Authoritative Edition.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:58, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Brian V. McDonnell.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brian V. McDonnell.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD which might be of interest to you

You contributed to the article so I'm letting you know: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John McCain lobbyist controversy, February 2008 Borock (talk) 10:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Logo of the Commission on Presidential Debates.gif)

You've uploaded File:Logo of the Commission on Presidential Debates.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:25, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Logo-emperorsclubvip-com.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Logo-emperorsclubvip-com.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rearrangement of Inauguration page

The edit buttons look fine now.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still good.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thx. Just tips me hat but then 〜on thought bows deeply … 00:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Things are cramming again.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is going on?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Duvall in Lonesome Dove.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Duvall in Lonesome Dove.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 06:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Roubini named to FP Top 100 Intellectuals.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Roubini named to FP Top 100 Intellectuals.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 22:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:The Price- My Rise and Fall As Natalia, NYs No1 Escort.jpg)

You've uploaded File:The Price- My Rise and Fall As Natalia, NYs No1 Escort.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Vice Presidential Debate '08 Washington University in St. Louis.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Vice Presidential Debate '08 Washington University in St. Louis.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Obama Inauguration logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Obama Inauguration logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Encyclopædia_Britannica_logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Encyclopædia_Britannica_logo.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Hi. I'm from Wikipedia Spanish. I'm translating the article Encyclopædia Britannica to Spanish. I'm interesting on used the logo. But i think i have to ask for permission from you. Can I use it on es:Wikipedia? Thanks, and, sorry for my english.- 天使 BlackBeast Do you need someting? 16:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, the problem is not to use it. I'ts that the image it doesn't in commons. But, if the image is not in commons, i can't use it on es:wikipedia. So, i don´t know how it's affects the license. Or not? - 天使 BlackBeast Do you need someting? 00:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:William Ayers.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:William Ayers.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photo photoshoped?

Hi. Regarding this edit, can you please provide the link to discussion of this photo? Thanks. --Oakshade (talk) 05:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Barack Obama/Family tree sandbox

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Talk:Barack Obama/Family tree sandbox, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Talk:Barack Obama/Family tree sandbox is a test page.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Talk:Barack Obama/Family tree sandbox, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

I hope you approve of the changes I made and will vote accordingly in the TfD. Thanks, Grsz ¹¹ 01:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Woah, what's with the changes to Template:Obama cabinet infobox. It's an infobox, so it should be justified right, not stretched across the page. Grsz ¹¹ 00:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's no permanent changes at all. Rather, since the template is currently unused, the template is simply being used to hold what is presently being used in its place, namely, a two-columned table; and once a section or article's text is filled out enough to adequately accompany the original right-column infobox, its formatting is to be restored. ↜Just me, here, now … 01:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, this actually makes it as a useful table for the Cabinet section of the Presidency article. I still think the Cabinet child-template needs to go, but it looks as if that isn't as easy now. Grsz ¹¹ 01:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And if it could be collapsable, its a perfect alternate to everything. Grsz ¹¹ 01:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "child template" is presently unused anywhere, actually. (Whereas this new two-columned table at Template:Obama cabinet infobox was contributed by a user to the Presidency of Barack Obama completely afresh!) :^) ↜Just me, here, now … 01:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's how I see it: Template:Obama cabinet should be used on all current and future members, Template:Obama personnel, Cabinet-level child-template needs renamed and used only on current members, Template:Obama Administration personnel can be used on general articles such as Presidency of Barack Obama or Executive Office of the President. Template:Biden Vice Presidential staff used for those people, and Template:Obama Executive Office for those. Grsz ¹¹ 03:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm totally confused by your comment, lol -- but nonetheless believe from the sound of it that you've got a good grip on things organizationally! ↜Just me, here, now … 04:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See my edit to Pete Rouse. Grsz ¹¹ 04:24, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see: an economical and sensible nav template in that context, yes. ↜Just me, here, now … 04:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Will you please change either the font you use, or the size of the text? It's nearly impossible to read. seresin ( ¡? ) 07:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oyghsh, mister or m/s. Upside Down Exclamation Mark Upside Up Question Mark! (I know that's your "talk" button, but still!...lol): Isn't it true that MANY (ahem!), a user's Wikipedia signature is more akin to, um, a symbol, per se, than an actual name: eg a single block letter or what have you? And wouldn't it seem that a curious contributor would usually resort to hi/r simply parking hi/r cursor over such a signature to see the user's actual screen disignation displayed in the usual (browser display-style) san serif font? ↜Just me, here, now … 16:26, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying you must, I was asking. The signature's not disruptive, so nobody is going to force you to change it. It's just something to consider. seresin ( ¡? ) 20:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obama cabinet infobox

I see that you removed the asterisk from Holder's name in {{Obama cabinet infobox}}. I wasn't aware that he'd been confirmed by the full senate (only by the judiciary committee); can you provide a source for the full senate confirmation? --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 00:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Link's here. :^) ↜Just me, here, now … 01:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Shangri-La Diet.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:The Shangri-La Diet.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Barack Obama. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Nar Matteru (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The idea is to give the warning BEFORE they have reached 3 reverts, as by that point they are already in violation. It is simply a warning, not a threat of administrative action Nar Matteru (talk) 18:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inauguration of Barack Obama

This user helped promote Inauguration of Barack Obama to good article status.

Thank you for the editorial assistance that you gave to help improve this article. Keep up the good work as we try to take this article to WP:FA.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did very little but thanks! ↜Just me, here, now … 07:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Barack Hussein Obama, Sr..jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Barack Hussein Obama, Sr..jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama FAR

I have nominated Barack Obama for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Avi (talk) 20:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Madelyn Lee Payne Dunham.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Madelyn Lee Payne Dunham.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Chrisdt1.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Chrisdt1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:07, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Andernl1.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Andernl1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sasha Grey

IMDB biographies are not considered reliable sources because they rely on user contributions and we don't know how they verify this information beyond changing it if someone sends in a correction or an objection. See [1] Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:34, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Morbidthoughts. ↜Just me, here, now … 23:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why the switch in infoboxes though? I'm not going to change it but there was other information in the adult infobox that is now deleted. I suspect other people might object to this. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With the R -Rated mainstream The Girlfriend Experience she's branching out from porn. ↜Just me, here, now … 23:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with file: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:First_Dog_of_the_US.jpg

Just a note to inform you that the image you uploaded and changed to read "Standard of the First Dog of the United States" has been nominated for deletion.99.142.1.224 (talk) 02:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]