Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three's Company in popular culture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nikolaus maack (talk | contribs) at 10:54, 23 April 2009 (Three's Company in popular culture: delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Three's Company in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

fancruft and trivia Aurush kazeminitalk 05:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unencyclopedic and mostly just a collection of useless information. What this amounts to is meta-trivia where one TV show makes reference to another TV show. Totally useless and the reason Wikipedia cannot be taken seriously as a project.George Pelltier (talk) 05:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Highly appropriate. The references from one show to another are what constitute popular culture. If both the references and what's being referred to are notable, that's sufficient justification. DGG (talk) 03:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. if they're so notable, they can go in the Three's Company article, what exists now is a list of miscellaneous facts ("trivia"). Per the Wikipedia guidelines on trivia, "Trivia sections should be avoided. If they must exist, they should in most cases be considered temporary, until a better method of presentation can be determined. Lists of miscellaneous information can be useful for developing a new article, as they represent an easy way for novice contributors to add information without having to keep in mind article organization or presentation; they can just add a new fact to the list. As articles grow, however, these lists may become increasingly disorganized and difficult to read. A better way to organize an article is to provide a logical grouping and ordering of facts that gives an integrated presentation, providing context and smooth transitions, whether in text, list, or table." Aurush kazeminitalk 05:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]