Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marti Wong

Marti Wong

NN, D ComCat 02:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable game developer D e nni ☯ 05:33, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Composer of a notable game. — Insta ntnood 07:08, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep malformed afd Dlyons493 Talk 08:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: One guy who worked on one game, according to the article. That's not notability or significant industry achievement. If the "keep" voters above can explain the other things he's done or why the nominator's habits are any reason to keep an article on some dude, it would help a lot. Geogre 11:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep apparently he wrote the games together with his brother. He was not part of a huge team as common in the games industry. Since his games have extensive articles, I can't see why he shouldn't. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:04, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. Dottore So 12:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable. Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:31, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable[1] -- Kaszeta 15:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Sorry, just not notable enough. A guy who worked on an obscure computer game in the late 90s is stretching the concept of notability to breaking point. Reyk 21:04, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep malinformed nomination. Please spell out your nominations.Gateman1997 22:05, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep please this is an important game programmer and people might want to learn about him at wikipedia the sum of human knowledge Yuckfoo 23:05, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep NNN and per Gateman1997 Turnstep 03:01, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Game developers who write games which sell are as notable as any author. No reason provided by the nominator as to why this person is "NN", Geogre does a much better job at explaining, but I am more convinced by Mgm's argument. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:19, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]