Jump to content

User talk:Juliancolton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 78.111.169.38 (talk) at 07:42, 29 April 2009 (→Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please click here to leave me a new message.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Make it better; do a GA review. (already have?)
Archive
Juliancolton's Archives

March 2008 Archive
April 2008 Archive
May 2008 Archive
June 2008 Archive
July 2008 Archive
August 2008 Archive
September 2008 Archive
October 2008 Archive
November 2008 Archive
December 2008 Archive
January 2009 Archive
February 2009 Archive
March 2009 Archive
April 2009 Archive

Smile!

Xclamation point has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! '
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks

Nz26 | Talk | Contribs | Email has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Deletation of article

Problems with neutrality of article

Hi! You helped me out twice before and I thought that you could again. If you have other things to do I won't bother you again.

I objected to the article 'Persian people' because it was biased, unfair and Contained factually wrong statements. You told me to share my concerns on the discussion page of the article and include a token that stated that the neutrality of the article was disputed. I have done all of that, where do I go from here? How can I get the article deleted and replaced with the correct one that was in place before they change it?

Thanks agains

Notice

Hello, Juliancolton. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Wikipedia:Sandbox_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{newmessages}} template.

Message

Hello, Juliancolton. You have new messages at Giants27's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Perhaps You Can Help...

A few of us at WP:TVS are having a problem with User:Theaveng adding copyrighted information to List of television stations in North America by media market‎. The information has to do with the Nielsen Television Markets. The user has been adding information from the FCC (which is exactly alike to the information Nielsen uses). To avoid being in violation of OTRS ticket #2008091610055854, the information is removed. For whatever reason User:Theaveng readds it. The user has been warned multiple times and had stopped, but started up again today. I reverted and issued a Warn4im warning. I brought this to User:Powergate92‎ (who has been involved in talk page discussions about this and who I thought was an admin) and he sugguested I bring it to an admin. Since you are the only one available at the moment, I bring this to your attention and ask what should be done. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 14, 2009 @ 21:42

That is the one that was plastered on all the histories of all the stations in September of last year. This is one of the links where the OTRS ticket was used back in '08. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 14, 2009 @ 21:52
Okie Dokie. Thanks...NeutralHomer • Talk • April 14, 2009 @ 22:05

My last edit to crank high voltage

As ridiculous as it sounds, in crank high voltage he does not kill the doctors because they were going to remove his heart. He heard them talking about removing his penis. It may not be appropriate, but the previous version was inaccurate. Please revert it back, or change it.

User:Robgugli - (Sock-puppet)

Can you check User:Robgugli out for me. I came across this user when I reverted this edit on there user page. To me it looks like vandalism. I was shock to see what they was putting on there page. Then I check out there edit count (Edit Counter) See here and I Discovered that they have 2 other accounts on here, User:Bkkimm and User:Wgugliel. So, then I see this THIS vandalism that User:Robgugli did to there other User:Bkkimm account. It says, Reverted edits by Robgugli identified as vandalism to last revision by Bkkimm.

Robgugli edits

I think this is a Sock-puppet. Can you let me know if this is a Sock-puppet or not. --Michael (Talk) 11:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Umm... do you want me to post this on the Administrators' noticeboard, Since there was no response.--Michael (Talk) 17:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done,.. See, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Robgugli. --Michael (Talk) 18:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
O my, No one has responded. I know it. --Michael (Talk) 02:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How long dose it normally take--Michael (Talk) 02:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, OK--Michael (Talk) 02:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Robgugli is now blocked. Can you look at his user page, Remove the vandalism. Thanks'--Michael (Talk) 07:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you missed the point

While I am not particularly upset that you closed the List of LGBT Jews as "keep", I think your rationale is not correct. I think you were bamboozled by a list of books about the intersection of LGBT and Jewishness, and closed the AfD based upon the entirely notable intersection.

But that intersection was not the rationale of the AfD. Nowhere will you find me argue against the notability of that intersection. You will find me argue against a random list of folk who happen to be at that intersection.

So I submit that your rationale as it stands does not address the true point of discussion, and ask you either to vary your closure or to vary the rationale. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since the consensus was more based upon the notability of the intersection rather than the notability of the list I disagree. As I said, I am not about to get bent out of shape over it, but I think the decision does not summarise the discussion to reflect the other things you took into account. Hence my request. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:WT:RFA

Not sufficient?--Caspian blue 19:04, 25 April 2009 (UTC) :Whenever you replied to me, I find no amusement from your comment.--Caspian blue 19:07, 25 April 2009 (UTC) [reply]

I just don't find any pleasure talking with you. No thanks for more visits.--Caspian blue 19:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I realized that my way of humoring/speaking is sometimes not properly interpreted by others unlike what I intended. That is my job to improve my communication skills. You seem like a friendly person given this note (I thought you may not visit me for just the small thanking note) So well, the above comment is struck off now. Have a nice day.--Caspian blue 16:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:User:Arknascar44/Love Cabal

Hello, Juliancolton. You have new messages at Download's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikia

Please could you confirm if you are Juliancolton on Wikia. We have had 2 impersonators on Admin Tools Wiki claiming to be enwiki admins recently so we need to make sure. Thanks. GT5162 (我的对话页) 09:47, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed –Juliancolton | Talk 15:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup Newsletter XIV

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 14:28, 26 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.[reply]

Thanks

for the closing the AfD cases. (I can less worry about my DKY nom :-) ).--Caspian blue

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of American public officials convicted of crimes

Obviously, virtually any admin would have closed this the way you did; I doubt I myself would have the guts to close it as "delete" (I would have gone for "no consensus"). Still, I think the issues raised in the AfD have not been sufficiently considered, and I'm thinking about listing it at WP:DRV. I wanted to give you a heads up first, and to get your thoughts. Thanks. Chick Bowen 16:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I think the basic problem I raised, which is that the list violates NPOV by singling out a few prominent cases of the many that fit the criteria, hasn't been addressed. I assume this is what the couple of delete voters meant by "criteria are too broad." The only response to that argument was, "can be improved." But I don't think the possibility of improvement cancels out the policy problems with the article--the question is: can it be improved enough? Chick Bowen 16:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe. But it seems to me that to fulfill NPOV it would have to be narrow enough to be completeable. For example, why Mitchell and not Haldeman or Erlichman, or Scooter Libby? Cabinet-level appointments only? But then that would exclude Abrams and Poindexter. If those two are included, then it seems it would have to be essentially any high-ranking member of the executive branch, which would make it too broad to be completable. List of United States Congress members who have been convicted of crimes, maybe. But I can't think of a list that would include somebody like Mitchell or Poindexter that would not essentially be choosing people based on their notoriety rather than any objective criterion. Can you? Chick Bowen 21:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UAA

Two questions for you:

  • Have you seen my response at UAA?
Wait, scratch the second thing. It is a blatant violation, look at its edits.
Heh, that works. Ceranthor 16:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit #1000

You happy now???? Lucifer (Talk) 00:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yay. :D –Juliancolton | Talk 00:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your summary disposition of AfD/Marco Lazzara

I do wish you had waited until the April 30, as I had requested, before closing the AfD for Marco Lazzara. I was prepared to provide counterarguments. I still don't see anything that would satisfy notability. I see attempts, but looking deeper, the references are no more notable than those of opera chorus members, and almost all of them are in Italian, in conflict with WP:NONENG. At the very least, I wish you had made an attempt to contact me. —Danorton (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message on my talk page, yes, please re-open per above. Thanks. —Danorton (talk) 00:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kipperoo vandals

For the life of me I can't figure why those three Zolarnaaq, Arctic Chill and Epiclulzman were vandalizing that page. Kipperoo only made 4 edits in the last 2 years and only about 40 altogether. Randomness? Anyway, you blocked Epiclulzman but not the other two, though they are not vandalizing at present. Dan D. Ric (talk) 03:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More suspected cases in Canada

There are suspected cases in Quebec and Saskatchewan in Canada in case you wanted to color the Canadian map. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.16.55 (talk) 04:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the 2 in Quebec. I'm looking for the cases in Saskatchewan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.16.55 (talk) 04:11, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


How is 6 people being mildly ill a "Medical Disaster in Canada"? Sheesh, a bit a alarmist, aren't we? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.205.252 (talk) 05:09, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:TRBlom

FYI, it appears that s/he moved the content to Cases of and responses to the 2009 swine flu outbreak after a very brief discussion on the main talk page (Talk:2009 swine flu outbreak#Cases and responses by country). I likely would have reverted the transfer anyway, but for other reasons... --auburnpilot talk 20:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

taco

An editor has requested that semi-protection be lifted from the article. I figured I would ask you about it, as you seem to have protected it. Thanks. Law shoot! 20:50, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That was some fast food work. Law shoot! 20:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected nebraska cases

[1], [2] these two links seem to list some suspected cases in Nebraska, I went ahead and updated the US article just saying there may be suspected cases. Do you think the tables should be updated also or as that premature. Thanks -Marcusmax(speak) 01:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, im on it. -Marcusmax(speak) 02:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I am doing further research, apparently the "suspicious specimen was negative" however I am looking for further details on the other cases before updating the table. -Marcusmax(speak) 02:15, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ya im updating at leat the text to say that particular case was negative, but the other 12+ cases are still unconfirmed per [3], [4], [5]. So here is my final question, do you think Nebraska sould be added to the table with 12+ unconfirmed cases, or should we hold off for further info. Thanks -Marcusmax(speak) 02:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I kind of thought. LOL, we don't need mass hysteria from information that is just breaking. Anyway thanks for the help. -Marcusmax(speak) 02:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UAA

How is User:Poopoo567 possibly appropriate? --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PirateSmackK

Eh... he's been asking damn near everyone for rollback. Check out User talk:Taxman#admin for some additional discussion of him.

I'm not going to undo your flag grant until I see some fresh evidence of jackassery, but just thought I'd drop you a line. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flu in NZ

Thanks for redirecting this. It all looks like hype to me. Previous outbreaks wiped out 10,000 people a day, and the world had less population then. I sometimes wonder how people would cope with a big outbreak. Wallie (talk) 15:19, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get me wrong. I have always thought the number one threat is pandemic, followed by world war, then depression. (maybe I should think about the environment - global warming too). People have been going on about crime, terrorism, immigration, etc. We are getting towards pandemic and depression now. Reality check! I just don't think this is the "big one". This one seems to respond to flu injections. I get annoyed why they don't use this to show what happened in 1918. In the US 500,000-650,000 died. That is worse the in the American Civil War. Wallie (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I feel so sick that so many people have died and will likely die. I'm laying off the article for today. I didn't know that an article can affect an author so much. :( User F203 (talk) 23:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rakt

Hi Juliancolton as the closing admin of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FC de Rakt (2nd nomination) could you have a look at the Rakt article. It was created by the same editor who made the article you deleted. There is one sentence about the village the rest is an attempt to circumvent the AFD. FC de Rakt even redirects to this article. It even contains the results of football matches played by this non notable team. An editor has reverted now a couple of times the removal of the table saying that they are so bad it is notable could you please throw your eye to it thanks. BigDuncTalk 18:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Free (Dani Harmer song)

Following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free (Dani Harmer Song), could you take care of Free (Dani Harmer song)? I think it's time for some salting. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Juliancolton. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Renaissancee.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--(NGG) 20:38, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Hello, Juliancolton. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--78.111.169.38 (talk) 07:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Juliancolton&oldid=286811023"