User talk:72.21.155.72
[P=NP]
Available commands:
break [location] <condition> break_info [breakpoint #] clear <breakpoint #> help [command] print <expression>
Proof. If h satisfies the ordinary heat equation ht = △h with respect to the evolving metric gij(t), then we have d dt R hu = 0 and d dt R hv ≥ 0. Thus we only need to check that for everywhere positive h the limit of R hv as t → T is nonpositive. But it is easy to see, that this limit is in fact zero. 9.4 Corollary. Under assumptions of the previous corollary, for any smooth curve γ(t) in M holds − d dt f(γ(t), t) ≤ 1 2 (R(γ(t), t) + |γ˙ (t)|2) − 1 2(T − t) f(γ(t), t) (9.2) Proof. From the evolution equation ft = −△f + |∇f|2 − R + n 2(T−t) and v ≤ 0 we get ft+1 2R−1 2 |∇f|2− f 2(T−t) ≥ 0. On the other hand,− d dtf(γ(t), t) = −ft− < ∇f, γ˙ (t) >≤ −ft + 1 2 |∇f|2 + 1 2 |γ˙ |2. Summing these two inequalities, we get (9.2). 9.5 Corollary. If under assumptions of the previous corollary, p is the point where the limit δ-function is concentrated, then f(q, t) ≤ l(q, T − t), where l is the reduced distance, defined in 7.1, using p and τ (t) = T − t.
References
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |