Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30: 30 days

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 31, 2005	Articles for deletion	Kept
August 15, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
August 25, 2007	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
September 14, 2007	Good article reassessment	Delisted
March 16, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed
July 11, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed
July 30, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
Current status: Delisted good article

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Judith Egerton (16 July 2007). "Final 'Potter' book already sets records". The Courier-Journal (Louisville).
Catherine Reese Newton (15 July 2007). "Riddles & Secrets". The Salt Lake Tribune.

The Resurrection Stone

The plot summary of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows wrongly refers to the Resurrection Stone as the second Horcrux, rather than the second Hallow. Could someone edit this? Thanks. Alycia Smith Cerrsmom (talk) 04:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're forgetting that it is both the second Horcrux and Hallow. cha ndl er · 22:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mistakes in the Plot Summary

The plot summary appears to have been written by someone who never actually read the book. There are MANY mistakes. For example, Narcissa Malfoy never asked Harry to save Draco. She merely asked him if he was still alive. The plot summary needs to be unlocked and completely rewritten. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.190.70.143 (talk) 22:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ummmm your wrong she asks him if he (harry) is alive then asks if Draco is safe and harry says yes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.184.212.126 (talk) 02:05, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adult Edition cover art

I think that all the articles on the Harry Potter books should have the covers from all three versions; Children's edition, American edition, and Adult edition. Maybe it's just me but I like the Adult edition art more. -BRENT —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.31.190.87 (talk) 05:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All images if you mean for all books are non free and would require fair use, and many would see it as decorating only to just get in the adult version and a foreign translation, why not the German, French, Chinese, Russian, Danish, Swedish etc if you're going to have the American version chan dler ··· 05:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dedication

Does anyone know if the first person J.K. Rowling dedicated the book to is Neil Cicierega, the creator of Potter Puppet Pals?