Talk:Project Chanology

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Project Chanology. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Project Chanology at the Reference desk.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Project Chanology article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 30 days

Project Chanology has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 28, 2008	Articles for deletion	Kept
February 13, 2008	Articles for deletion	Speedily kept
February 28, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
February 28, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted
March 12, 2008	Good article reassessment	Listed
May 1, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
Current status: Good article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Scientology Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latest sock disruption

Apparently in addition to DavidYork71 (talk · contribs), we now have YesOn8 (talk · contribs) using socks to disrupt this article:

Comparable2Allah (talk · contribs)
Helpur (talk · contribs)
CatUrineCuredMe (talk · contribs)
McCainSoulBro (talk · contribs)
QuaylePalin2012 (talk · contribs)
SoothingDharma (talk · contribs)
Upperclear (talk · contribs)
ThankYouDianetics (talk · contribs)
PornAndPrawnExtravaganza (talk · contribs)
OngoingHow (talk · contribs)
1Bridge2FreeAll (talk · contribs)
HubbardTechGuardian (talk · contribs)
Bfair2mychurch (talk · contribs)
Sjbraden (talk · contribs)
67.222.12.152 (talk · contribs)
68.184.150.94 (talk · contribs)
81.241.176.23 (talk · contribs)
220.233.172.193 (talk · contribs)
123.2.123.220 (talk · contribs)
194.54.88.40 (talk · contribs)

Some of the more recent socks used to revert to the same material in this article. More info here, here, here, and here. Cirt (talk) 05:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an ongoing issue. If anybody else makes that same edit to this article, it is safe to assume that they are also either a sockpuppet or meatpuppet, and should be blocked. So if anyone is reading this and considering changing the article in that same way, then don't. You will be held accountable. Firestorm ^Talk 05:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with this comment by Firestorm (talk · contribs). I am adding some more socks that have disrupted this article to the above list. Cirt (talk) 05:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/YesOn8/Archive, users investigating YesOn8 (talk · contribs) also thought that YesOn8 was itself a sock of DavidYork71 (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 06:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added Sjbraden (talk · contribs) to above list - account was blocked by the same Checkuser that connected the YesOn8 (talk · contribs) series of socks to DavidYork71 (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 00:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

partyvan.info isn't the wiki! It's a mirror for last measure! Edit it out —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.151.34 (talk) 10:08, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]