Jump to content

User talk:Fastily

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Himasha Wijesurendra (talk | contribs) at 09:30, 16 May 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please feel free to leave a new message. To do so, please click here - I will respond on your talk page as necessary :)
-Fastily

Can you help me with Wikipedia?

Hi, my name is Himasha. I'm still new to Wikipedia. Can you help me with editing and creating articles? Himasha Wijesurendra (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:25, 14 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]

RE: Re: Can you help me with Wikipedia?

Is there a way in Wikipedia to create & edit articles without viewing its source? - I mean in web designing we can use a software like Dreamweaver instead of typing its source in a text document & saving as an HTML. Is there a way in Wikipedia to create & edit articles simply as using dreamweaver in creating a web page?--Himasha Wijesurendra (talk) 09:30, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:N. M. Price - Sir Walter Scott - Guy Mannering - At the Kaim of Derncleugh original scan.png

Hello,

you asked to delete File:N. M. Price - Sir Walter Scott - Guy Mannering - At the Kaim of Derncleugh original scan.png however it looks meerly huge and started down loading OK. Have you confirmed that the full resolution is a dud? It is too large for WP to produce a thumbnail. There is a sepcial note requesting that it not be deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:26, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Green Guestbook

Thank you for your help with my guestbook. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 10:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image downloads fine. Unfortunately,Wikipedia cannot thumbnail PNG images over 12 megapixels, however, if anyone wants to re-edit the original scan, they would need to work from the PNG, not the JPEG. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 13:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback

Unfortunately, my RFA was closed today with a final tally of 75½/38/10. Though it didn't succeed, I wanted to thank you for your participation in it. I intend to review the support, oppose, and neutral !votes and see what I can do to address those concerns. Special thanks go to Schmidt, MICHAEL Q., TomStar81, and henrik for their co-nominations and support. — BQZip01 — talk 20:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]