Jump to content

Talk:List of content management systems

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Potomak (talk | contribs) at 14:50, 18 May 2009 (Adding ArcaCMF insertion request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconComputing: Software Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
WikiProject iconSystems List‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is within the field of Systems.

CompactCMS

{{editsemiprotected}} I'd like to include my open source CMS. It meets all requirements to be listed for as far as I can tell. If not I'd like to hear where to improve.

ArcaCMF PHP MySQL 0.1 GPLv3 18th May 2009

Best regards. potomak (talk) 06:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cotonti CMS added

Added Cotonti to PHP CMS list. New release as of Feb. 1 2009. http://www.cotonti.com Jslowik (talk) 06:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CompactCMS

{{editsemiprotected}} I'd like to include my open source CMS. It meets all requirements to be listed for as far as I can tell. If not I'd like to hear where to improve.

CompactCMS PHP MySQL 1.3.1 GPL 9th Feb 2009

Best regards.

It does not look like CompactCMS has a article on wikipedia. It needs to meet the notability requirements for inclusion in wikipedia first and then can be listed here. 16x9 (talk) 00:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other proprietary CMS suggestion

{{editsemiprotected}}

* Name: jNetPublish
* Platform: J2EE
* Supported databases: mySQL, Oracle, MSSQL, ... (any JDBC)
* Latest stable: 3.4.0
* Url: http://www.etnetera.cz/etn/en/solutions/products/jnp.html
See above. 16x9 (talk) 15:46, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ImpressCMS

ImpressCMS has been updated on 2009/3/8. Version 1.1.2 Final available. I can't edit this page and I hope someone can and will :( Source --by alopix (talk) 09:14, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - updated 16x9 (talk) 12:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TYPOlight

{{editsemiprotected}}

* Name: TYPOlight
* Language: PHP
* Supported databases: mySQL
* Latest stable: 2.6.6
* Date: 6 FEB 2009
* License: LGPL
* Url: http://www.typolight.org/index.html

--93.197.157.202 (talk) 11:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which section should it go in?--Aervanath (talk) 16:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
* 3.3 (Free and Open Source Software -> PHP)
Declined as there is no article, previous article deleted as spam. 16x9 (talk) 20:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Solution to many of these problems

Why don't we simply branch off all of these sections in their own articles? We could have a "Comparison of PHP CMS Software" and a "Comparison of .NET CMS Software". This would allow the inclusion of an increased number of software to be listed, as well as a more detailed analysis of them all. Right now, there are simply too to many items, with too little information to really be of any use to anyone.

Additionally, while weblog software is "CMS" software, it is in a completely different scope than Software like Joomla! or Drupal, and so I propose and "Comparison of Weblog Software" be branched off of this as well since a person looking to start a blog isn't interesting in creating a full website in the scope of Joomla! and vice versa. This would also cut down on the clutter and make comparisons easier. I know this would require a fair amount of work, but removing items to simplify this page is only going to disagreement. Bragr (talk) 00:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally we all ready have a Weblog Software page so those items being listed here are redundant. They should be removed and a comparison done there. I would like to go forward with this, but I would like the concurrence of other members involved in this page. Bragr 17:37, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Protected?

What is it with protecting articles? Do you think after you lift the protection the spammers will stay away, or do you want to make Wikipedia less free?

Anyway, {{editsemiprotected}}Radiant (software) released v0.7.0 on 2009-02-07, I would have quickly updated the article but now I have to abuse the talk page for it.--87.162.41.35 (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

concrete5

I would recommend adding concrete5 to this list, pending its status as a legitimate article on Wikipedia. Waykup (talk) 18:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, if it stays then it should be added here. 16x9 (talk) 21:41, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]