Talk:Military history of Rey, Iran

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Iran Mid‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East / Early Muslim

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)

A fact from Military history of Rey, Iran appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 June 2008 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/June.

Wikipedia

Comment

Yes, this is a ridiculously long article. It began quite innocently, when I Googled to check something in the article Battle of Rayy, and found that in reality there had been more than one battle at or near Ray. I therefore decided to put together a little summary page, to encourage people with more expertise in the field to create articles on other battles (and sieges) at Ray. If I'd known just how many military actions there had been around Ray, I would probably not have started! The principal basis for the article is a rummage through the Cambridge History of Iran; as far as possible, everything has been checked against articles on relevant individuals in the Encyclopaedia of Islam (1st edition) and the Encyclopaedia Iranica, and against other sources found via Google.

To solve the length problem, my preference would be for people with a good grasp of Iranian history to write new articles on individual battles and campaigns, so that the relevant sections in this article can be trimmed to a bare minimum (as has been done with the "original" 811 CE battle). Another possibility would be to split the article into smaller chunks- but the natural division points are near the beginning (the Arab invasion) and near the end (the Mongol invasion). Any other suggestions? David Trochos (talk) 19:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Somebody just tried putting a Main Article link to this page from the History and Culture section of Ray, Iran. I've changed it to a See Also, because, dare I say it, I think somebody could and should create another article to balance this one, giving more details of the city's amazing cultural history. I'm too traumatised at the moment to attempt it... David Trochos (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You've clearly done enough work to earn some artistic license, but might I suggest simply taking each of these sections and moving it to a stub immediately? Then create a WP:disambiguation page at Battle of Ray. Potatoswatter (talk) 02:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What makes me reluctant to do that immediately is the problem of defining the "sections". I've just done a count, and by my reckoning this article refers to about 110 separate military incidents involving attempts to take control of Ray. The section divisions within the article are partly arbitrary, with narratives crossing the section boundaries. David Trochos (talk) 07:59, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly a WP:navigational template could help tie many articles together as well. Potatoswatter (talk) 02:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- May be worth a shot; I'll give it a week or two and see what possibilities emerge. David Trochos (talk) 07:59, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

I think it would be better to rename the article to Military history of Ray, Iran. Any thoughts? --Kober^Talk 06:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was a possibility I had considered, but I became uneasy about the possible consequences. At the moment the article says very little about the practicalities of Ray as a garrison town- if it turns out that there is a significant amount of information available from archaeology etc. on, for example, where within the walls troops were quartered, the article would have to get even bigger! David Trochos (talk) 07:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history of Ray, Iran is better than the current title. Alefbe (talk) 16:24, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming some such move is made, would "Ray" or "Rayy" or "Rey" or "Shahr-e-Rey" be the preferred name of the city? I used "Ray" because the general article on the city used that spelling, and it was probably more apropriate than "Rey" to represent the pronunciation of the name a thousand years ago. Personally I consider the "Shahr" element in the modern name rather redundant, a slightly feeble attempt to remind people that this suburb of the capital was once great. David Trochos (talk) 18:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ray is better. Rey is also fine (based on the current pronunciation). Shahr-e Rey is not appropriate (it is not common in English texts and not even in Persian texts about its history). Alefbe (talk) 21:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, in that case, before we do anything I'll contact Megastrike14, who added Shahr to the title, and check that there are no overwhelming objections. David Trochos (talk) 18:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]