Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TAway
Appearance
Inappropriate use of userspace, to keep an article which is about to be deleted per an AFD, and article that had been deleted by two past AFDs, and recreated three times now. Not only that, this user is using the page to attack other editors. — Dædαlus Contribs 06:52, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- My user page states my opinion of a recent ArbCom decision. I am working on an article using only mainstream sources -- and how do you know it is "about to be deleted," anyhow? TAway (talk) 06:54, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Your userpage states that Sysopping that particular user was a mistake, which is attacking said user.— Dædαlus Contribs 06:56, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, sysopping anyone with <70% support is a mistake. Trying to construe that as an attack? Feel free, carry on. TAway (talk) 06:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Calling another admin's judgement a colossal failure is another. As the AFD, I'm pretty sure you can read. Recent news coverage does not make a person notable.— Dædαlus Contribs 07:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- A bureaucrat's colossal failure in judgment, actually. TAway (talk) 07:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- That doesn't change the fact your commenting on contributors instead of content.— Dædαlus Contribs 07:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm commenting on process, actually. TAway (talk) 07:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- You mean like you did here? It's harassment, plain and simple. You were told to stop, so now you're continuing on on your own page.— Dædαlus Contribs 07:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm commenting on process, actually. TAway (talk) 07:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- That doesn't change the fact your commenting on contributors instead of content.— Dædαlus Contribs 07:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- A bureaucrat's colossal failure in judgment, actually. TAway (talk) 07:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Calling another admin's judgement a colossal failure is another. As the AFD, I'm pretty sure you can read. Recent news coverage does not make a person notable.— Dædαlus Contribs 07:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, sysopping anyone with <70% support is a mistake. Trying to construe that as an attack? Feel free, carry on. TAway (talk) 06:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Your userpage states that Sysopping that particular user was a mistake, which is attacking said user.— Dædαlus Contribs 06:56, 27 May 2009 (UTC)