Talk:Judge Advocate General's Corps (United States)
Military history: North America / United States Start‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Law Redirect‑class | |||||||
|
I made a number of minor changes to this page, including 1) clarifying that there is no unified entity known as the "Judge Advocate General's Corps of the United States," only the separate JAG Corps of each service; 2) clarifying that Air Force judge advocates are (technically, at least) line officers; 3) clarifying that judge advocates are not actually "members" of the court but only detailed to it - the members of the panel (non-JAGs) are the members of the court; 4) noting that the one third enlisted rule applies only upon request from an enlisted accused, and applies to special courts as well as general; 5) noting that an accused in a general court as well as a special court may request trial by military judge alone; and 6) noting that judge advocates must be "real" lawyers in addition to their specialized military training. --PubliusFL 02:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Dead links?
The Army and Navy external links don't seem to work. Regards, Guido den Broeder (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
American Brit?
The link from Judge Advocate, a British legal term, redirects here. Is there an article for the British use of Judge Advocate? --Noclevername (talk) 06:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Redirect-Class law articles
- NA-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles