User talk:Petrosianii

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.^[1][2][3][4] OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:22, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. Template:Do not delete OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Kegel male trainer balls.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kegel male trainer balls.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to take down the photos and upload them into Flickr. I have permission from the copyright holder to upload them, but I will do this to satisfy Wikipedia editorial requirements. I have also found academic and scholarly research regarding the product which I will be using to resolve the NPOV dispute. Thank you.

Petrosianii (talk) 19:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the Kegel Male Exercise Trainer article, and merged its key points into the Kegel exercise article, as was suggested by the Wikipedia editors. I have redirected the original URL of the article to the new one.

Petrosianii (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2009 (GMT)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Pubococcygeus muscle, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.Template:Do not delete --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Edward Longley

I have nominated Edward Longley, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Longley. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. rootology/equality 17:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Smkovalinsky. Is this you? rootology/equality 16:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no. one of my writers, who helps me with wikipedia editing. Or, that is, used to, until you guys banned her.

And I just found this too by the way, from the wikipedia forum.

Let me state for the record

None this is aimed at you, Rootology, only the forum people listed below, and hypocritical Wikipedians in general ...

You know, it's very very distressing, upsetting, that so many of these people can say such mean and hurtful things about someone they don't even know, even libelous things, and no one checks them. But the minute a person with good intentions tries to put up an article on wikipedia, and does it for pay, you guys get very judgmental.

Here's what bothers me about this. One, it's simple. Business is business. There is absolutely no way anyone's going to convince me that a large portion of the articles in wikipedia were not written by paid ghostwriters. C'mon! Get real! I mean, do you guys really think that Martin Scorcese, Kim Kardashian, actually wrote their own bios in here?? And that the writers who wrote it weren't paid for it? Are Wikipedians really that naive?

Delete the article. I really don't care. I've already made all the money I'm going to make off it. Truly. I'm a businessman, not a matyr, a philanthropist, an altruist. Trust me, no one here is going to hurt my feelings by deleting the article. But if you're going to delete it just delete it. Don't give me all this high-minded, sanctimonious crap about "Paid editing a no-no" and "wikipedia has such high standards for blah blah", and "I can't believe the nerve of this guy"...

You may ban me, that's fine. Or sockpuppetry, or whatever the hell you call it. ((I don't even know what that means, exactly). But I like to say, like Michael Jordan used to say, "They can't stop me, they can only hope to contain me for a little while." Wikipedia won't make or break me - y'all can believe that.

There is nothing unethical about a person paying a company to write a bio about them for wikipedia. If you want to rip it down, rip it down. But it just seems to me the mass of Wikipedians are sanctimonious and very judgmental of the motives of people they don't even know.

I ought to sue Wikipedia for even allowing such slanderous talk that appeared on your forum, take back some of that $6 million PEOPLE LIKE ME donated to the project (and YES I DID DONATE).

Posts in this topic

thekohser   Another paid editing service   Yesterday, 5:35pm
 Kato   Paid editing was always OK. It's just when you...   Yesterday, 5:49pm
 Somey   So, is editing for payment okay now? Well, you hav...   Yesterday, 5:50pm
 CharlotteWebb   This is him on Wikipedia: User:Petrosianii. So,...   Yesterday, 5:58pm
 CharlotteWebb   Hmm, he uses the flickr upload bot to copy images ...   Yesterday, 6:15pm
 TungstenCarbide   He'll probably be banned now that you've c...   Today, 8:57am
 zvook   [quote name='CharlotteWebb' post='176014' date='M...   Today, 2:38pm
 thekohser   The Braun Mincher article is truly hilarious. I l...   Yesterday, 6:03pm
 carbuncle   What is [url=http://nj-professional-writing.blogs...   Yesterday, 6:06pm
 thekohser   [quote name='thekohser' post='176010' date='Mon 1...   Yesterday, 6:13pm
 thekohser   Take a gander at the traffic on that Kegel Male Ex...   Yesterday, 6:30pm
 CharlotteWebb   I like how Rootology is trying to go about this ...   Yesterday, 6:45pm

 Achromatic   What is this guy's deal, and how has he been ...   Yesterday, 7:15pm
 emesee   perhaps if this human is being treated more reason...   Yesterday, 7:42pm
 thekohser   So, is Rootology telling us that paid editing is n...   Yesterday, 7:44pm
 carbuncle   WHOIS for GNOSISARTS.COM Administrative Contact:...   Yesterday, 7:50pm
 EricBarbour   Why, that's very sweet of you, Rootie. Now, ...   Today, 7:18am
 The Joy   Why, that's very sweet of you, Rootie. Now,...   Today, 7:43am
 thekohser   User:Hipocrite has taken to applying the "COI...   Today, 1:56pm
 Hipocrite   User:Hipocrite has taken to applying the "CO...   Today, 2:40pm
 sbrown   So, if a COI flag is imprinted on an article, wha...   22 minutes ago
 carbuncle   I'm not sure if this was a complaint from an a...   Today, 2:54pm
 thekohser   I'm not sure if this was a [url=http://en.wik...   Today, 6:34pm
 Hipocrite   I'm not sure if this was a [url=http://en.wi...   Today, 6:37pm
 thekohser   That's a checkuser confirmed sockpuppet. Why ...   Today, 6:49pm
 GlassBeadGame   That's a checkuser confirmed sockpuppet. Why...   Today, 6:56pm

Petrosianii (talk) 21:49, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]