Jump to content

User talk:199.246.2.9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Thing That Should Not Be (talk | contribs) at 20:36, 3 June 2009 (Message re. Green roof (HG)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Hi. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, you are mistaken regarding the spelling of the name of City of St. Catharines. Please consult the city's website if in doubt. Based on this, I have reverted your edits. Have a nice day. ~-Qviri 05:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for experimenting with the page Age of Enlightenment on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Krich (talk) 00:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Trombone. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Special-T 22:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Please do not make personal attacks against users, as you did to User:Steven Solarz. If you have a content dispute you would like to discuss, please feel free to bring it up in a civil manner on Steven Solarz's talk page. Thank you, Dar-Ape 02:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Oxygen

Your recent edit to Oxygen (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content, as you did to Buffalo Bills. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Bennybp 23:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


April 2007

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Nellie McClung. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Nivix talk 15:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nellie McClung, you will be blocked from editing. Nivix talk 15:35, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Johnny Au 01:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalizing Pages

Stop vandalizing Wikipedia, as what you did to 'Demonic Resurrection'. You should be banned. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sashazaara (talkcontribs) 23:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]


May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Apollo 11. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Demonic Resurrection (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 00:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wyoming Valley battle and massacre, you will be blocked from editing. Ali 00:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Octopus (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 18:53, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 00:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury was changed by 199.246.2.9 (c) (t) replacing content with '[[Image:ceciljr.JPG|thumb|right|Robert Cecil, <br> 1st Earl of Salisbury. <br> Painting by John De Critz <br> the Elder, 1602]]<sup>Superscript text</sup>your mom...' on 2007-09-22T20:52:19+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 00:52, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ottawa Senators, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ottawa Senators was changed by 199.246.2.9 (c) (t) deleting 49480 characters on 2007-09-22T21:01:28+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 01:01, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page 207th (Carleton) Battalion, CEF do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'tripod\.com' (link(s): http://21st-battalion-2.tripod.com/page1.html http://21st-battalion-2.tripod.com/page1.html) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 12:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Forbidden City (novel) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 23:16, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Japanese Canadian internment has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ~Pip2andahalf 01:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to South Beach diet has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --[[::User:Unpopular Opinion|Unpopular Opinion]] ([[::User talk:Unpopular Opinion|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Unpopular Opinion|contribs]]) 19:26, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mario Kart. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Lewis Macdonald worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 01:12, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Galileo Galilei, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 01:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Lupus anticoagulant constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Damicatz (talk) 16:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Stone Age has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. –Capricorn42 (talk) 12:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

This is your only warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Michel Chossudovsky, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // Chris (complaints)(contribs) 14:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Green roof has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 20:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]