Jump to content

Talk:United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Another Believer (talk | contribs) at 03:39, 24 June 2009 (B Class, Mid Importance). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconU.S. Supreme Court cases B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconLaw B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCannabis B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDrug Policy (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Drug Policy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.


9/5/2007 changed the number of OCBC cards issued to 100k from 10k, based on the fact that I am member #100xxx as of July 2007. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.61.113.243 (talk) 16:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

added aftermath section

added a aftermath section which gives a brief update on how the OCBC functions today. I also briefly mentioned the current lawsuit going on which is trying to overturn medical marijuana in the California. Please feel free to edit if you feel this information shouldn't be here

Are these facts verifiable? ---Axios023 (talk) 01:45, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I removed the tags looking for wikification, sections, and sources because I made some improvements. However, it still needs work. I would like to see a more detailed explanation of the Supreme Court ruling and an explanation of the what issues are still being considered by the lower courts. I would also like to see a little more context and information about the local politics and parties involved in the case. There is plenty of information in the links I provided. Lagringa 08:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm up for it. ---Axios023 04:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stay by Ninth Circuit. Can anyone verify the fact that the Ninth Circuit issued a stay in this case pending the outcome in Raich v. Ashcroft? The stay should have been lifted by now. What has happened since? ---Axios023 04:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OCBC's web site has pdf links to virtually all the relevant court pleadings in this case. Looks like the stay's legit. Too bad the Ninth Circuit doesn't have free public access to its docket over the internet. ---Axios023 05:16, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Links to medical necessity article. Someone had added links from this article to the "medical necessity" article. Since that article doesn't discuss the term "medical necessity" as it's being used here (as a legal defense to a criminal charge), I removed them. ---Axios023 06:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]