Jump to content

Talk:The Problems of Philosophy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 62.73.248.37 (talk) at 05:03, 5 July 2009 (Isn't epistemology part of metaphysics?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Literature Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Philosophical literature
WikiProject iconBooks Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Isn't epistemology part of metaphysics?

This article claims that

"...Russell concentrates on knowledge rather than metaphysics."

I just read this book and found it to be all about epistemology, that is, the philosophy of knowledge. But epistemology, I believe, is generally regarded a branch of metaphysics. So to me, this seems to be logically equivalent to "In his book on relativity, Einstein concentrates on time and space, rather than physics."