Bidding fee auction
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
(April 2009)No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. |
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (April 2009) |
A bidding fee scheme, also known as pay per bid auction, is type of auction where participants pay a fee for every bid that they place on a timed auction. Each bid raises the price of the auction by a fixed amount and extends the time of the auction. When the time runs out on the auction, the last person to have placed a paid bid is the winner and gets to purchase the item at the auction ending price. Since this type of auction model is quite new and blurs many lines of business, some consider them to be a grey area business model.
Pay per bid auction sites seem like a very lucrative business. The companies running the auction receives income both in the form of the fees collected for each bid, and in the form of payment for the winning bid. When looking at certain items, it may seem that these auctions are making large profits. However, such sites also consistently lose money on some auctions. New pay per bid auctions keep opening all the time, but most of them close shortly. Users are more likely to get good deals on newly opened sites, as there is not too much competition from other bidders and auctions tend not to last as long as on mature sites. If a pay per bid auction sites does not attract enough bidders, it sells many items at a loss.
How it works
In the typical case, players are asked to pay a non-refundable fee each time to purchase "bids." These "bids" can then be spent on "auctions." The act of spending a "bid" on an "auction" raises the cost of the item by a fixed amount. Additionally, the act of spending a "bid" on an "auction" typically also extends the deadline of the "auction," providing an opportunity for a competing player to place another "bid", thus extending the "auction" again. The game is a brinksmanship game: each successive "bid" lowers the value of the "reward", and the last player to decide to place a "bid" and lower the value of the reward wins that reward.
Once the "auction" has been won, the auctioneer collects the final cost of the item in addition to the monies already collected by selling "bids".
Example
For example, an auctioneer might put a $100 gadget up for auction in a system that charges $1.00 per bid. Each bid increases the auction price by $0.10. Let's say that the starting price of the auction is $1.00, and that the final ("winning") bidder manages to acquire the gadget at the price of $25.00. To get from $1.00 to $25.00 in $0.10 increments requires 240 bids. Each bid cost each bidder $1.00. Thus, the auctioneer has collected $240.00 for the bids, plus $25.00 for the sale of the item, for a total of $265.00. Assuming the auctioneer paid $90 for the gadget, the gross profit is $175.00.
The bidder who placed the last bid (for $25.00) has had to spend at least $1.00 for the bid, as well as the $25.00 to purchase a gadget which retails for $100.00. He may have spent more money on prior, unsuccessful bids. All the other bidders who have placed the prior bids have spent $1.00 for each bid they placed prior to the winning bid and came away with nothing material.
Risks
The primary risk of the bidding fee scheme website is that it is misunderstood as a regular auction. Unsophisticated participants will not understand the distinction between a regular auction and a pay per bid auction, and so might apply poor judgment when participating. This has the secondary impact of polluting internet advertising with ads where a customer is unable to distinguish between regular stores or traditional auctions from pay per bid auction sites. As a consequence, the value of internet advertising and price comparison sites are diminished.
For example, one bidding fee scheme site placed an internet ad that advertised "A New PS3 at $80.35," deceptively implying that a new PlayStation 3 was available for anyone to purchase at that price.
Bidding fee scheme sites also exploit the sunk costs fallacy that is endemic in the human psyche. The fallacy causes players to psychologically feel that the past progress of a bidding fee scheme game affects future behavior, thus biasing the player towards larger wagers.
Some bidding fee scheme websites provide automatic agents that automate the placing of "bids". These agents are marketed in a way to make them seem comparable to the kinds of bidding agents (for example, PhantomBidder) used on auction sites such as eBay. However, in practice, these agents facilitate the rapid investment of large wagers by unsophisticated players who might not fully understand how the contest they are participating in works.
Because bidding fee scheme websites exist in a legal gray area, there is little to no verifiable enforcement of rules.
Much like any auction site, there is no protection from the practice of bid shilling, in which the auctioneer uses a puppet to place bids in her own auction. This practice is illegal in legitimate auctions, but is particularly nefarious in bidding fee scheme auctions. Due to the risk of shilling, even after the players have spent large quantities of money purchasing "bids" in the auction, the auctioneer can still deprive any of the players of a winning bid by placing an additional bid of her own. To protect oneself against the risk of such shill bidding, the best practice would be to use only reputable long-standing websites that disclose their management, investors or other details of the company. Those sites that do not readily divulge who is running the site, complete with contact information, should be avoided.
Certain companies that run bidding fee scheme websites show the same auctions on multiple websites [1]. People bidding on different websites are, in fact, competing against each other!
Since the profit is made through bidding fees, the bidding fees are not refundable. Also, as with any other site, bidding fee sites can appear and disappear quickly so it could be possible for a bidding fee site to collect bidding fees for several auctions and disappear before awarding the prize.
Since the webmaster is the only one who can see the bids, it is also possible for the webmaster to bid on the item his/her self, which would be unfair to others but hard to detect. This would, however, be illegal and once again, a bidder can protect himself from this by only bidding at sites operated by long-standing reputable companies.
Benefits
Only bidders with intent to purchase the item will bid because each bid costs money, thus removing the risk of a "joy bidder" that is found on other Internet based auction sites, where the "joy bidder" simply drives up the final price for another winner, or if the "joy bidder" wins, then does not pay and complete the transaction.
The practice of "sniping" at the last second of fixed time auction such as eBay is no longer a concern because bidding at the last second extends the clock for an additional time increment.
References
- ^ Swoopo (2009). "International Auctions". Retrieved 2009-06-03.