User talk:Nishkid64
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #7 |
Nangparbat Today
- 86.160.112.4 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)Wikireader41 (talk) 03:47, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Dealt with. CAn't believe there's so much hagiography Wikipedia:Featured article review/Pakistan YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 04:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- 86.153.129.95 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)Wikireader41 (talk) 22:32, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
86.158.234.201 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)Wikireader41 (talk) 23:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
81.158.129.71 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)Wikireader41 (talk) 00:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- 86.160.112.112 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)Wikireader41 (talk) 00:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
86.151.122.78 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)Wikireader41 (talk) 21:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- 86.158.239.14 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)Wikireader41 (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
86.156.214.67 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)Wikireader41 (talk) 21:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 86.154.149.61 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)Wikireader41 (talk) 00:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- 86.153.128.190 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)Wikireader41 (talk) 21:22, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
86.156.208.28 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)Wikireader41 (talk) 21:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- 86.153.133.238 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)Wikireader41 (talk) 19:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- I blocked user:24.28.76.204 as a hkelar sock and user:86.158.236.221 as Nangparbat for 3 weeks - both falling under WP:DUCK--Cailil talk 02:06, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
75/76/RevAntonio
When is this so-called editor going to be banned from wikipedia? Please check my discussion page and you will see he is leaving the same sorts of harrassing messages as he has left elsewhere. I want him stopped please. Thank you for your assistance. He simply doesn't get the message. Finneganw 03:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- At the moment, he's not banned, but indefblocked. Banning won't really change anything for now; he simply will continue to pop up under a new IP every few hours. Just keep on ignoring him and I'll semi-protect pages to prevent his IP harassment. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 02:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! Finneganw 10:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
He's back and trashing me on other peoples' talk pages, here are the two new IPs he's using:76.195.92.44 and 75.21.103.13 Aggiebean (talk) 11:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
ResearchEditor sock
As an FYI, RE is back, he recreated the extreme abuse survey page and the ritual abuse-torture page. I've fixed those but there may be more. I'm surprised the EAS page wasn't salted, considering this was the [1] [2] third or fourth time this has happened. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 12:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Salted, socks blocked. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 22:04, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Interestedinfairness/Mr.Neutral checkuser
Hi, can you clarify what you mean by "Possible"? In the interest of AGF, the user (now indef blocked) seems convinced that a user with a grudge created that account and deliberately acted as his sock to get him banned. "'Mr.neutral' did not do me any favors..."
That'd obviously be a less reasonable claim if the IPs were from the same city block.
(Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Interestedinfairness/Archive) --King ♣ Talk 13:40, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, they both come from the same general location, but there's hundreds of active WP editors coming from that area. Judging by the shared MO, I believe it's Possible that the two are the same, but then again, it could easily be someone else. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 22:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Religious war
Is the editor who adds stuff about how Buddhism is the religion of war banned? If so, wouldn't it be better to revert and block him rather than protect the article? ⟳ausa کui × 19:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, he's banned user Hkelkar. Unfortuantely, revert+block does not work with this user because he will come back under a new account name to undo my edit. In addition, there's another banned user Nangparbat, who is going around WP trying to revert all of the edits made by Hkelkar socks. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 12:19, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Question
Hey, I have to wonder why you made this edit [3]. The question the IP was asking seems innocent enough. Deavenger (talk) 22:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- The IP belongs to banned user Nangparbat. He's repeatedly attempted to recruit other editors to do his bidding under false pretenses (somewhere along the melee, he forgets to mention that he himself is a banned user). Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 12:21, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for explaining it to me. Deavenger (talk) 00:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Hometech
Heh, you notified him YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 02:17, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)
The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Recent sockpuppet investigations
Hey, I would like to initiate a user checks on user:Cinéma C and user:Athenean for alleged use of sock puppet violations. I think one of these two users may have created the Mr.Neutral or any of the others. I know user:Metrospex has been "proven" to be the culprit, but I still think there is something missing here. As you know, these two users have accused me in the past. How do I initiate a sockpuppet investigation? Interestedinfairness (talk) 23:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC)