Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chile

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 200.83.203.138 (talk) at 20:56, 22 July 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage WPT

Rating in quality scale and importance

Articles related to Chile needs to have a rating on the quality scale and importance. I propose that in this section we should vote for the importance and quality Chile-related articles. Please read the articles before voting and read about the quality scale and importance below in this page.


Quality

Note: This quality scale is identical the one in WikiProject Argentina, if you think this WikiProject Chile could have a better scale please write about it in the discussion page.

Pages progress grading scheme
Template:FA Featured article Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status after peer review. Articles are placed in Category:FA-Class Chilean articles.
A The article provides a well-written and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a Great Article. It includes a complete article and an appropriate series of headings to break up the article. It should have sufficient external reliable references, and properly illustrated. It should be at the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status. Articles are placed in Category:A-Class Chilean articles.
GA Reserved exclusively for articles that have received Good Article status after peer review. Articles are placed in Category:GA-Class Chilean articles.
B The article is "almost there" but it may be missing secondary information and details. Alternatively, the English may need a comprehensive rewrite to make it flow. Articles are placed in Category:B-Class Chilean articles.
Start The article has a good amount of content, but it is still weak in certain areas. Articles are placed in Category:Start-Class Chilean articles.
Stub The article is either a very short article or a stub that will need a lot of work to bring it to A-Class level, although there may be a significant amount of material in the article. Articles are placed in Category:Stub-Class Chilean articles.
Needed The article does not exist and needs to be created. Articles are listed in Category:Needed Chilean articles.

For further details, see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment.

Importance

Note: This importance scale is identical the one in WikiProject Argentina, if you think this WikiProject Chile could have a better scale please write about it in the discussion page.

There are 4 grades for importance as defined in the WikiProject Chile article's importance. Please note that the importance of an article is independent from its quality.

Pages importance grading scheme
Top {{top-importance}} Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia. Articles are placed in Category:Top-importance Chilean articles.
High {{high-importance}} Subject is exceptionally important. Articles are placed in Category:High-importance Chilean articles.
Mid {{mid-importance}} Subject contributes a depth of knowledge. Articles are placed in Category:Mid-importance Chilean articles.
Low {{low-importance}} Subject fills in important details. Articles are placed in Category:Low-importance Chilean articles.

I believe we would do it following the instructions indicated here. Please feel free add or change the rating of an article. Voting only in the case of serious discrepancies. Jespinos 02:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Project Move

I think it's time for moving the project to its definitive location. Jespinos 01:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Dentren | Talk 05:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles rating

How do we add articles to Needed Chilean articles if such page doesn't exist? Any guidelines? Should we move the "Requests" list from the Wikipedia:Chile-related regional notice board to this new category? Can I just go around searching for very small articles and tags them as Chile-stub (or specifics Chile-bio-stub/Chile-geo-stub)? Is this kind of behavior correct? Kilroytech 20:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photos / images submission

I have literally thousands of hi-res (3000x2008) pictures taken by me which I'd gladly upload if anyone requests a copy of one of them for a specific article, as there are so many I'd like to expose the link where I have them posted, feel free to request from amongst them, they are at Flickr. NOTE: Some of them are from other countries where I've been, but those are just a few compared to Chilean ones, most are from either Magallanes or Santiago and its surroundings, including Torres del Paine, Puerto Williams, Antarctica, Punta Arenas, Parral, Rancagua, and many central Andes Mountains such as Pochoco, La Cruz, Manquehue, Provincia and El Morado. Kilroytech 20:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw photos for the articles Nevado de Longaví, Laguna del Laja and Sierra Velluda. Have you photos of Cordillera Darwin? Jespinos 23:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't aware of Sierra Velluda, but you are right. About Cordillera Darwin, I guess I might have some, I'll check. Meanwhile I'll upload the ones you noticed.

Article Tracking

After a while of participating in Wikipedia, I think there are a bunch of tools which may be useful for of Chile Project, mostly bots, but as I'm absolutely clueless about them (which do exist, and where can I add new bots), is that I raise this issue as a public matter of discussion, trying to improve our "performance" ;)

We should have some "article size bot", and "missing articles bot", attached either to categories or to an article list, the first one will tel us which are the least developed articles and the later would give us information about which articles we should create, I think this will really help us. Are bots for this already in Wikipedia? If not, where can I attach a self-made one? Are there any tutorials about it? If not needed, is there any particular Wikipedia function that solves any of these issues?

About categories: can categories be hierarchically related? i.e. parent categories list articles included in child categories. Can one create such a category tree? For example we could create a branch like this: Chile => Magallanes Region => Geography of Magallanes Region, similar examples with, flora & fauna are possible, and other themes like those, this hierarchies could be particularly helpful when finding relates articles while doing the revision process.

I suggest that we should also be very thorough at coordinate templates use, I have an Excel file from NIMA (US National Imagery and Mapping Agency) with all the places they have about Chile, it included both name and coordinates, as well as some other extra information that I've never used. This file was created by me using public data downloadable from NIMA's web site, so I think we could share it to use it as a basis for our work.

The bot User:Snowbot can do WikiProject tagging. --GentlemanGhost 13:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

town/city naming

I'm not sure if you've all noticed, there's a discussion on the current naming convention at Wikipedia talk:Chile-related regional notice board#Settlement naming conventions' Change Proposal. --Scott Davis Talk 08:56, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of clear agreement in any direction, I've opened a poll to help to develop clarity. Please express an opinion at Wikipedia talk:Chile-related regional notice board#settlement article naming poll. --Scott Davis Talk 12:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nest your project banner?

You may wish to add nesting capability (see {{WikiProjectBannerShell}}) to your project's talk page banner. This allows banners to be hidden and, hence, the TOC to be closer to the top of the talk page when an article is within the scope of several WikiProjects. In particular, there is a lot of overlap in the articles of Category:Chilean cuisine. --GentlemanGhost 12:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Osorno

Hello all. The Osorno, Chile article awaits review! I have been working on the article for some time now, and I think I have done as much as I can for a non-Chilean, non-Spanish speaker who has never been there. Most of the article is translated from the original Spanish [1], and I think it is pretty good, except it needs citations. Would anyone know where to find these, and how much of it needs it? Thank you! Korossyl 17:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A model to follow

I've just recently discovered an article which, in my opinion, is an excellent example of what an article about a place should be: Sale, Greater Manchester. If we can bring most articles about Chilean topics (places especially) even half-way as good as this one, we will have done a job to be proud of. --JAXHERE | Talk 16:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars

I have created the following two Barnstars for the use of Wikiproject:Chile. What do you think? I like the one with the plain background on the right. Korossyl 20:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would add a copihue to the star. Otherway the red-blue-white colours seems too common. Dentren | Talk 00:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dentren's idea would be a nice touch. --JAXHERE | Talk 15:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well.. who will do a new star? Dentren | Talk 10:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cautín Province

I did a little work on Cautín Province last night, mostly making links. How does it look to you? I believe the article needs a bit of polish. Brian Pearson 00:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An anon, with some kind of agenda, replaced completely an old version of the article. A portion of the content is, apparently, a machine translation from the corresponding Spanish article. The History section is information from other sources, which I have not understood. What is the better way of fixing this, to revert to the old version or copyediting? Jespinos 02:13, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure. I'm a bit new at this, myself, but I'd lean towards copyediting. Maybe some others will chime in with their thoughts. Brian Pearson 23:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article is much longer now, but the quality is lower than before. The article is full of opinions and thing needing citations and sources, but also needed to wifified and explained.. I dont like to eliminate info, so I will try to fix the article a little. Dentren | Talk 08:19, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that sounds good. I was thinking this article could be a nice blueprint for the other province articles -- some of which haven't been developed nearly as much. Brian Pearson 01:14, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, now I'm confused. My confusion arose when I thought I'd take a stab at a bit of editing, myself. First, there was the second paragraph which didn't exactly match the last one re Economy. Then, after I began looking for what they meant by the word, "silvoagropecuaria", I thought, well I'll go to the Spanish Wikipedia for Chile [2] and see what they have, only to learn that they have a completely different name for Cautin: "Coihaique" [3]. Brian Pearson 01:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The corresponding article is es:Provincia de Cautín, I don't understand what you are referring to. Jespinos 16:57, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you checked the links, you'd see the Chile article[4] which shows the various regions. Region IX (under Organización territorial) is shown as La Araucanía, with Temuco as capital. I can only guess that there are different names for different versions of Spanish, possibly from different countries -- one which gives Araucanía and another which gives Cautín. BTW, I see you've done some work on Cautin, since I last saw it. Brian Pearson 20:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I do not understand you. Temuco is capital of Región de La Araucanía that is composed by two provinces: Provincia de Cautín (capital: Temuco) and Provincia de Malleco (capital: Angol). Bye. --Lin linao 23:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC) PS: You can use internal links: [[:es:Chile|Chile]] gives Chile.[reply]
Understanding has dawned, thanks! Brian Pearson 00:25, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New project banner

Hi all! I just joined the project as I'm interested in contributing (I'm part Chilean) and took the liberty of creating a new project banner based off of the banner I created for Wikipedia:WikiProject Greece - {{WPGR}}. The new banner is located here: User:Kimon/WPChile. I don't want to modify the project's banner before obtaining the membership's consensus. Let me know. --Kimontalk 20:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As there wasn't anyone against this, I took the initiative to make the change. I've created a new template called {{WPChile}} and redirected {{WikiProject Chile}}. I also created the documentation section to it under this project. --Kimontalk 01:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please show the 2 project banners in this section? I dont see any mayor difference between the old one and the new. Can you create a barnstar also? Dentren | Talk 08:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is the old one and this is the new one: {{WPChile}}. Some of the differences:
  1. Nesting
  2. Criteria for B class
  3. "listas" option
  4. "peer review" option
  5. "attention needed" option
  6. Check to see if placed in talk page
  7. "infobox needed" option
  8. "auto" option (automatically assessed by bot)
  9. parameter values are not case sensitive (more complete now) and more flexible
As for a barnstar, I'll give it a try. Can't promise though since I'm not a graphics guy. --Kimontalk 13:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Outreach

It looks like this is a pretty small/dormant project. We only have 8 participants and it's not very clear how many of them are active. I propose starting an outreach project by inviting Wikipedians who identify themselves are Chilean, of Chilean origin or living in Chile. We can approach the users listed in the categories Category:Chilean Wikipedians and Category:Wikipedians in Chile. I've created an invitation template to be used for just this purpose here: {{WPChileInvite}}. --Kimontalk 17:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When the project started there was about 5-6 active editors but now most of them are not specially active. There is a good to search for new members among Category:Chilean Wikipedians and Category:Wikipedians in Chile. There are also a lot of Chileans editing in the Spanish wikipedia. I will invite more people. Dentren | Talk 08:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I will try doing something with AWB or somesuch tool. Who knows, we may be successful and get this project going. Hopefully, we get enough traction to help create a portal too. --Kimontalk 16:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I created an outreach section for the project and have completed the first edition of the project's newsletter. I'll be using AWB to deliver it to all the current members and from then on, only to those who subscribe to it. --Kimontalk 17:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Project barnstar proposal

I created a new barnstar that we may want to use for the project ({{BarnstarWPChile}}. Take a look at it:

The Barnstar of WikiProject Chile
Awarded from xxxx to xxxx

--Kimontalk 18:41, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I made some minor changes in the barnstar.. I hope there is somebody to give it to. Dentren | Talk 08:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good although border style is straight. --Andersmusician VOTE 05:04, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I like the changes you made Dentren. --Kimontalk 16:49, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Chile?

Is there any interest to create a portal for Chile? I will start the portal and create as much content for it as I can but, I'll need help. Anybody willing to assist? --Kimontalk 15:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've created it: Portal:Chile. Feel free to edit/amend as you see fit. There's a lot of work to be done. --Kimontalk 17:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
For now there isnt many people that use the portal but in the future I hope it helpfwill be useful. Here i made alist of Chile-related pages in wikipedia.

Dentren | Talk 07:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would argue that there are very few members of this project but there is a larger and wider interest in Chile.
Hopefully, enough interested editors will join and contribute to our project and make the pages in Category:Chile featured articles :) --Kimontalk 18:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising for the project

I've requested from Andrew Hampe to create an ad for {{Wikipedia ads}} in order to recruit more people for this project. I'll post updates here as I get them. --Kimontalk 13:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chile in the Dutch Empire

Hello everyone! There is a discussion at Talk:Dutch Empire#Request For Comment: Map, because user Red4tribe has made a map of the Dutch Empire (Image:Dutch Empire 4.png) that includes parts of Chile. Would you like to comment? Thank you. The Ogre (talk) 16:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Map http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Dutch_Empire_new.PNG http://www.colonialvoyage.com/ square=tradingpost (Red4tribe (talk) 16:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Still OR, POV and unsourced (yours is not not a credible source). Please discuss stuff at Talk:Dutch Empire#Request For Comment: Map. This was just a request for comment, not a discussion. Thank you. The Ogre (talk) 16:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chilean-Australian: request for comment

Hi! A vigorous - and now somewhat nasty - debate has emerged over the article Chilean Australian over the size of the Chilean-Australian population. The sole protagonists are myself and User:TeePee-20.7, and much of the discussion is on Talk:Chilean Australian.

TeePee is referring to an essay, written by a student intern and published on the website of the Chilean Embassy in Australia, that details the history of the Chilean-Australian population. Much of the article is quite informative and reasonably well written. However she estimates the Chilean-Australian population to be 45,000 without explaining how she arrived at this number.

In other articles that look at ethnic groups in Australia, Australian Bureau of Statistics 2006 Census data is used to present the number of persons (a) born in a particular country, and (b) declare to have ancestry to a particular country (either alone or in combination with one other ancestry).

TeePee is strongly opposed to using this data, and instead insists on solely referring to the essay reference. I do not think the essay's estimate is accurate.

There is one limitation to the ABS data - somebody who has a Chilean ancestry might only choose to declare themselves according to their new Australian identity, or their European heritage. However I have included a caveat which draws attention to this minor flaw, as well as a statistic on how Chilean-born Australians defined their ancestral backgrounds in 2001.

I believe this version should be used.

TeePee has adopted a highly aggressive posture (and has been previously blocked), and has claimed I do not adequately cite references (even though six out of the seven references in the version above go to my ABS sources). No amount of compriming, humouring, reasoning or exercising of a time-out has worked. Wikipedia would benefit from a third party opinion on this page.

And by all means, seek his side of the story. Kransky (talk) 10:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorting through the Propaganda

1st point: True

2nd point: False, very vaguely True - I am not referring to the essay written by the intern who was at the Chilean Embassy. I am referring to the data published by the Chilean Embassy on their website! There is no indication that the intern provided this information as she is not credited to it on the page but Kransky fails to fathom this.

3rd point: True

4th point: False - This is completely false and once again Kransky is lying! If you read the discussions between us you will be able to see this and infact you can even certify that the data has been used so once again Kransky has chosen to act inappropriately and lie once more.

5th point: True - This one took him a while. I had to tell him this because he could not comprehend it before hand but then he adds the caveat trying to shut me up hoping I would not revert his edit where he sneaked in unreferenced information which he has constantly been doing. Only he is not able to comprehend that just because you're Chilean doesn't mean you will put down your ancestory as Chilean as Latinos in general are very multiracial and might wish to put down European, Native American or even specific countries such as Germany in which to indentify as their ancestory.

I believe the current version as of 20:41, 12 May 2008 should be used.

Once again he is disparaging me and behaving inappropriately. I will not even attempt to put into words the patients I have displayed with him you can see this when you intervine in our dispute.

Thankyou for your time and I hope we aren't too much of a burden on you. TeePee-20.7 (talk) 16:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Status of the "Special Territories"

Advice please, about the status of Easter Island and the Juan Fernández Islands.

Somebody added them to the list of countries article, describing them as "dependent territories", thus making them analogous to, among others, Greenland, French Polynesia, Aruba, Gibraltar and Puerto Rico.

Someone has now deleted it again, preferring them to be, as they were previously, described as "overseas regions of countries legally integrated into the country", along with French Guiana, the Canary Islands and Hawaii.

So what does the designation "special territory" amount to, and how different is their legislative or self-governing status from that of the rest of the country? Thanks Kevin McE (talk) 23:17, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

  • The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
  • The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
  • A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 22:08, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles flagged for cleanup

Currently, 734 articles are assigned to this project, of which 138, or 18.8%, are flagged for cleanup of some sort. (Data as of 14 July 2008.) Are you interested in finding out more? I am offering to generate cleanup to-do lists on a project or work group level. See User:B. Wolterding/Cleanup listings for details. More than 150 projects and work groups have already subscribed, and adding a subscription for yours is easy - just place the following template on your project page:

{{User:WolterBot/Cleanup listing subscription|banner=WPChile}}

If you want to respond to this canned message, please do so at my user talk page; I'm not watching this page. --B. Wolterding (talk) 16:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Chile

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American cinema task force

A Latin American cinema task force has been proposed at WP:FILMS, which would include the cinema of Chile. Interested editors are encouraged to sign up - if there is enough interest, then the task force will be created! Many thanks, Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 20:29, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Based on a search of Wikipedia's articles related to Chile, I've found some articles that I believe are about places in Chile, and could usefully have geographical coordinates added.

The articles in question are listed in Category:Chile articles missing geocoordinate data. At the time of writing, some examples included:

  1. Coihaique Province
  2. Estadio Municipal de La Pintana
  3. Juan Pablo II Bridge
  4. Llanquihue Province
  5. Mancera Island
  6. San Quintín Glacier
  7. Sanhattan

...and there are many more, as well. At the time of posting this notice, there were 331 articles in this category needing geographical coordinates.

Why add coordinates?

By adding coordinates, a Wikipedia reader can easily view the location on a street map, nautical chart, topographic map, by satellite photo, realtime weather map, and in many other ways. Coordinate data makes an article eventually appear in various services such as Google Maps' Wikipedia overlay, Google Earth, and Wikipedia's own internal map service. Coordinate data also helps readers looking for geographically-based data, such as locations near a reference point, or related information.

How can I do it?

The articles are all marked with {{coord missing}} tags, which need to be replaced with {{coord}} tags that contain the location's latitude/longitude coordinates; or you might be able to add coordinates to an existing infobox. You can find out how to do this at the Wikipedia:Geocoding how-to for WikiProject members. Please let me know if this is useful, or if you have any questions! -- The Anome (talk) 09:54, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Animals?

Is there anything anywhere about animals and plantlife in Chile????????IAmTheCoinMan (talk) 11:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:06, 28 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 08:57, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

mormon temple in Santiago

There is a Mormon temple in Santiago. Should the article belong to this WikiProject? LDS-SPA1000 (talk) 18:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for a 200-WikiProject contest

A proposal has been posted for a contest between all 200 country WikiProjects. We're looking for judges, coordinators, ideas, and feedback.

The Transhumanist    00:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Patagonian Expedition Race

This article needs some work. I think this race is probably notable (using Spanish-language media articles), but I did not find anything in English using Google News Archive search that meets the requirements of Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline other than this one article in a small-town newspaper. I don't read Spanish, so I can't check the other media references.

Links to the race's website were widely spammed across multiple Wikipedias resulting in its URL being blacklisting:

We now have a request to "whitelist" the link on this Wikipedia:

If the article is worth keeping, we should probably whitelist the link; otherwise given its history, we should probably keep it blacklisted.

Can someone look at this article and see what you think?

Thanks, --A. B. (talk • contribs) 00:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with everything you said about needing work, probably notable, yet difficult to locate any English articles. It would probably be best to request some assistance from the Wikiproyecto:Chile on es.wiki. Although, their version of the page looks nearly identical to ours, right down to the same external links, so I'm not sure how much help they can offer. Looking at it on de.wiki and fr.wiki, it looks like the article is nearly identical everywhere and suffering from all the same problems (fr.wiki has flagged it orphaned, unverified, and promotional).
Maybe the best thing to do would be to try to coordinate a general cleanup across four languages: WikiProject Chile (en), Wikiproyecto Chile (es), Projet Amérique du Sud (fr), and WikiProjekt Argentinien (de) (if WP Argentina is willing to work on a Chilean article). Regardless of fr.wiki's and de.wiki's participation, I would say that es.wiki's help would be really beneficial. —Willscrlt ( “Talk” ) 06:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much for your insights.


Hey there....I'm pretty sure no one grows wine in the Coquimbo region....or the world. Wine is produced, grapes are grown. Just passing through...but seems like something to notice.

I don't speak Spanish -- could someone contact w:es:Wikiproyecto:Chile about this? Thanks, --A. B. (talk • contribs)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chile&oldid=303605523"