Talk:NProtect GameGuard

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Previous problems of nProtect GameGuard with Windows Vista and AVG have been resolved. 210.217.175.101 (talk) 07:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence regarding the Error 114 was removed due to the link to the FAQ page where the Error can be resolved. Kevinkph85 (talk) 08:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The previous problem with Panda Security has been resolved. Kevinkph85 (talk) 00:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To make flyff run in ubuntu, i used: VirtualBox Drivers for the video card Directx 9.0 Directx sdk --Manatax (talk) 19:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like that GameGuard doesn't conflict with NetLimiter anymore. This is using Vista x64 DarkStarZN (talk) 07:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Game Guard will not work on Windows 7 Beta. DarkStarZN (talk) 12:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone clarify what B2B2C is? 144.32.58.227 (talk) 18:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've tested a lot of things that its supposed to conflict with (for instance Razer mouse, launching apps from Steam) and nothing seemed to happen - everything seemed to work just fine. Also - has some reputable security organization actually analyzed this program and determined it is a rootkit? I've searched all over, but haven't found anything.Skuld-Chan (talk) 08:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No need. The article states quite clearly that it hooks API calls and actively manipulates them to hide its processes. That is the definition of a rootkit. So as long as those statements are true, no further analysis is needed. --DanielPharos (talk) 12:58, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]