User talk:Elaich

Welcome

Hello, Elaich, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mushroom 17:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As of today, I am taking a Wikibreak from all things Ed, Edd n Eddy. -- Elaich ^talk 19:14, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

for past disagreements...

treelo _radda has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Just a Note

Hey, hope you have a good holiday!

For the part i added for the Big Picture Show, I just wanted to clarify with you, that the article was in the November issue that i have with me.

And I've taken it out as it offers nothing that hasn't already been said even if it is from a different source. treelo _radda 18:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should Adult Swim task force cover anime and off-network programming?

Comments? Please visit this discussion. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 21:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Level 3!?

You are joking, right? If not, please regard that it's called a mistake!--Editor510 ^{drop us a line, mate} 17:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please WP:AGF about your fellow editors. The edits may be unsourced WP:OR, but they are factual and not vandalism. A simple rewrite if you dislike the tone and asking for a source or finding one yourself would have sufficed. Do not accuse others of vandalism. You may like to read WP:OWN as you seem to be very attached to retaining the article as you wish, to the extent of shouting at other editors (not just User:Editor510) in edit summaries [1] and claiming vandalism for their good faith edits. That is considered very bad manners, and a level 3 warning is appropriate only if the obvious intent was vandalism, as is explicitly stated at Wikipedia:UTM#Multi-level_templates. Simply explain to them your opinion, and it may be a simple change in wording such as saying another sentence which describes the different date a series came out in another country, or adding a cite, is all that needs to be done to achieve a version with which everyone is happy and by which the articles are improved. It could be that other editor even got the date it aired wrong, but made a simple mistake, which is not vandalism. Wikipedia is a collaborative venture, and that's how the articles best improve and a good atmosphere conducive to keeping editors on the project is maintained. Consider this a level 3 warning (just joking :) ) Sticky Parkin 19:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed some Wiki policies...

Your edits do smell like Ownage. I do believe that the warning I was given is pot-kettle-kettle-pot (that means you are a hypocrite in all due respect, if you don't speak British). Also, it helps not to focus attention to just one thing. I am not attempting to bully, hurt, or anger you. I am just stating that you should really look at your wrongs before you look at mine. Thanks. :)--Editor510 ^{drop us a line, mate} 10:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went looking for the edit that has caused such a furor, and surprise! It's nowhere to be found! So, now nobody can even look at it to see what the problem was. If you got some friendly admin to delete it, there's a lot more brewing here than an accusation of vandalism. -- Elaich ^talk 17:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it was a blip. Just leave it. Don't do a 66.213.25.12 and stalk me...--Editor510 ^{drop us a line, mate} 12:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Bangles

Apologies for the lateness of this reply, but I'm not here very often any more. Sorry about the Bangles edit; I didn't check the history very thoroughly, I'm afraid, so I assumed that comment was an overly-POV bit that nobody else had gotten around to removing yet. I do think you were overly pessimistic about Bell247's reaction, though, as I see from the history that to this date (three months later) s/he still hasn't put it back. -- CWesling (talk) 03:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]