Jump to content

Talk:Fort Bragg, California

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) at 07:51, 25 July 2009 (Replacing {{WikiProject Banners}}: merge numbered parameters and change to WPBS (2 banners) per consensus). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Fort Bragg disambiguation page

I've started a discussion to make Fort Bragg a redirect for Fort Bragg, North Carolina and moving the content of Fort Bragg to Fort Bragg (disambiguation). Please head over to Talk:Fort Bragg, North Carolina to join in on the discussion. --Bobblehead 16:02, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of city officials

Having separate entries seems a bit excessive. It might be one thing to list the entire city council; quite the other to have individual entries. No other city in California to the best of my knowledge has entries like this city. Ronbo76 03:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Furthermore, the entries are out of date--Baltierra is no longer a councilmember, and Turner is no longer mayor. If there are no objections, we should consolidate this article into perhaps one paragraph. Also, the bit about glass beach at the end of the article in which the article instructs the reader to be careful when approaching the shore seems awkward and un-encyclopedic. I will try to edit this article. Jasper124c41 05:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

new college in Fort bragg

they are currently in the process of building a new college. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.117.9.216 (talk) 00:00, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

Suggestions for page improvement

Readers could benefit from knowing a good deal more about the town: how to get there, the major industries (tourism, fishing, logging?), what's available for tourists (fishing, lots of bookstores, the Skunk railroad, massive botanical garden, lighthouse), weather conditions, etc. The article as it stands doesn't say very much characteristic. Also, it shows the Pudding Creek Trestle without explaining what it is (and was) for, and that it's currently not there, in the sense of being incomplete and impassible under reconstruction.Alpha Ralpha Boulevard 06:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]