User talk:Woohookitty

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Woohookitty/Archive13. Archives prior to 16 June 2007 were compiled by Werdnabot/Shadowbot3 and can be found at the right hand side of this page. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Original Area Codes

The title of Original area codes did not need to be changed. Back then these were the only area codes in existence. Plus only North America uses area codes to this day. Everywhere else uses country codes and versions of country codes. I think the original title was better.

FYI

It appears that nobody alerted you to this thread even though it is going nowhere and resolved. Just thought you would like to know anyways. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about not coming to you directly. I guess I had an attack of paranoia. JRSpriggs (talk) 12:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

66.183.69.201

Hi Woohookitty. I have a complaint and question regarding the IP user. This person got into a heated debate with me regarding an article for deletion that was deleted. She made inappropriate accusations and has proceeded to delete her comments on MY talk page. I don't think it's appropriate to clean out someone elses' talk page. If it's not considered inappropriate, please let me know but if it is, I would like to request that the IP user is warned. She has been warned about her attacks on other contributors but not for clearing out another contributor's talk page. Hopefully you can help and clear up any misunderstanding I might have regarding guidelines on other contributor's talk page. Thank you for your time. Tree Karma (talk) 19:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carefull

If you have a good look at the repercussions of this edit of yours, you will surely be more carefull next time when using AWB inside templates. Mind you, it is not easy to spot, but you broke a template and a reference with that small and innocent looking edit. Debresser (talk) 19:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Potential edit war on Brianna Stewart page

Hi- I just wanted to say that someone is putting in an unsourced claim on the Stewart page about how her story has been used for the upcoming film "Orphan". I reverted it back to your edit stating that unless they had a citation for this claim that it couldn't stay, but they changed it back. I did check on the internet & there's nothing by the production or writing staff to back up this claim. I am familiar with the movie & there is some similarity, but without proof it's all a hypothesis by someone. Can you step in & maybe do something to keep this person(s) from altering it? They don't have an account but I still posted on their talk pages- they just have an IP address. Thanks! Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Tokyogirl79[reply]

Redirects

Do you have an opinion on where Oldest shipwreck should redirect? There is an active dispute between a list of shipwreck and what Wikipedia cites as the oldest shipwreck. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 08:32, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Take care with auto redirects

This edit [1] was incorrect. The 1770-1772 plague was a regional case, not a pandemic. A correct subst would be plague -> Plague_(disease) had it not been for Russian plague of 1770-1772. I'd recommend you to browse through your recent auto edits and check for obvious out-of-context edits.

P.S. WP:NOTBROKEN still stands. Regards, NVO (talk) 12:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Careful with themes

Hi, I notice you're disambiguating "themes". Just careful: in linguistics, there's actually two very different concepts: Theme (linguistics) (which is about semantic topics of a sentence), and Thematic vowel (which is about a word-formation element in Indo-European stems). Ancient Greek grammar needed the latter, not the former. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry if I came across as aggressive. No blame, just a heads-up. I appreciate the difficulties in this kind of work. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, now that I look at how confusing that linguistics section at Theme is, I can blame you even less :-) I'm trying to reorganise those links now. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:42, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, no, Theme music and Theme (music) I think should be kept apart. The one is a whole piece of music in itself, and restricted to the use of music subordinate to other non-musical genres (like shows); the other is a structural part within a piece of music. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gidget

I don't think the page for gidget should have been redirected. The Taco Bell Chihuahua page is about the mascot for Taco Bell. The Gidget page was for an acting dog, information about the dog should not be on the page of the mascot. Consider undoing your actions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Padsquad43 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi

I want to move rapping to rap. is that cool? do we delete the hisory at rap? on a related note, I think almost all the content in the current version of rap (disambiguation) (bunch of acronyms) belongs at a place named RAP. can you help me navigate any deleting that needs to be done, as long as none of this is too controversial? Bingo Bob 23:21, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

gidget

alright, well if you checked, taco meat was the edit before yours, and was vandalism. there's not much to source. the dog was known for taco bell, and most of the information was from on the news articles. the sourcing on the page as it is isn't all that great neither.