Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Molloy (footballer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jhealy (talk | contribs) at 15:53, 27 July 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jason Molloy (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Footballer fails WP:ATHLETE as he has not played at fully-professional level of football. Lack of non-trivial significant third-party sources means he also fails the general notability guidelines at WP:GNG. Only independent source is a stats page which doesn't confirm he passes WP:ATH or give us any significant coverage of this person. --Jimbo[online] 15:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Your list of AfDs about Irish soccer player is biased as it doesn't include the many numerous players who have been deleted via PROD or AfD - a number which far outweighs those that have been kept. GiantSnowman 15:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • WHAT? Show me your list of players that have played in the Premier Division in Ireland that have been deleted or else stop flappin yer gums because providing a list of every player under the sun that has gone to AfD is about a relevant as quotin the price of cabbage.--Vintagekits (talk) 15:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - player fails WP:ATHLETE (as he hasn't "competed at the fully professional level of a sport") and WP:N (as he hasn't "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"). GiantSnowman 15:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'm opposed to this deletionism in general - as Vinatagekits says, it almost looks like disruptive editing, but this player unfortuanately does not meet the criteria here. I'd suggest the article history be kept however, to facilitate its reappearance should notable sources appear. Jhealy (talk) 15:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]