Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 July 24
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by B (talk | contribs) at 11:38, 18 August 2009 (→File:LarsenBerra.jpg: delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
July 24
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: deleted - The LOC says that they have not assessed whether or not individual images in this collection are copyrighted, so we can't just assume it is public domain. My personal opinion, though, that it would certainly qualify for fair use given how iconic this photo is, should someone feel inclined to take on the task of uploading a reduced size, writing an appropriate rationale, etc. --B (talk) 11:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- PD tag bears no relation to source page, where it says this may be restricted and that research is needed. i don't think anyone has done the necessary research and don't know if it's even possible to confirm the copyright status Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per the Library of Congress online document Copyright and Other Restrictions That Apply to Publication/Distribution of Images: Assessing the Risk of Using a P&P Image, the Rights and Restrictions statements for both the Encyclopedia Britannica collection and Wide World (facts associated with the image, the collection from which it comes, and the company that made it) have been researched. The image is not marked with a copyright notice and no registration has been found. The image has been widely reproduced and there is no evidence of any copyright claim being made on it. A good faith and comprehensive effort has been made to determine the image's copyright status, and all available evidence indicates that it is in the public domain per the existing tag.—DCGeist (talk) 12:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a copyrighted image from a commercial web site. It is not a low-resolution version and its inclusion is not necessary to the understanding of the article. 76.26.71.32 (talk) 05:50, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Enterprise logo final2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ddevilleres (notify | contribs).
- Uploaded for use in a spam/advertising article. McJEFF (talk) 12:28, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Orphaned, no encyclopedic purpose. — Σxplicit 04:17, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NosferatuShadow-ENLARGED.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ericd (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned image - no use anywhere on project. Duplicates File:NosferatuShadow.jpg except enlarged using a technically unsophisticated image resizing algorithm. No point for it to be here. DreamGuy (talk) 15:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I've tagged the image as having no source.--Rockfang (talk) 19:55, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.