Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ze-gen
Appearance
- Ze-gen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP, WP:NOT, WP:SPAM and WP:COI. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to Ze-gen. Was speedied twice under WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G11 spam advertising. Self-promotion and product placement are WP:NOT the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 (talk) 18:56, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- KeepZe-gen is an innovative green technology company and this page is extremely informative. This page helped me grasp the concept of liquid metal gasification which I believe to be one of the many technologies required to re-energize our community and environment. There are articles out there in this space enernoc that are much more geared towards advertising. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Water2polo (talk • contribs) 20:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - In-depth coverage by Forbes - Business Wire – earthtimes.org - International Business Times – CNET News – Boston Globe – Recycling Today – Patriot Ledger – Bloomberg plus numerous international sources, in my opinion, meets our notability criteria for inclusion here at Wikipedia. Thanks ShoesssS Talk 20:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Shoessss. There are plenty of in-depth reliable sources in Google News Archive. This company easily passes WP:CORP and WP:V. Cunard (talk) 22:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - The coverage at sources listed above indicates that Ze-gen passes WP:CORP. "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." Gary (talk) 22:35, 19 August 2009 (UTC)