Jump to content

User talk:Lectonar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Galonga (talk | contribs) at 19:32, 6 September 2009 (→I answered TWICE your email with days of separation and yet you ignored it. Aren´t you supposed to be kind and stuff?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Talk Archive 1, Talk Archive 2, Talk Archive 3, Talk Archive 4, Talk Archive 5, Talk Archive 6, Talk Archive 7, Talk Archive 8, Talk Archive 9, Talk Archive 10, Talk Archive 11

Silly and funny stuff can be found here

Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. I will respond on yours unless you request otherwise; please respond on mine so that my new message box lights up, as I will notice your message sooner. Thank you.

If you email me, be aware that even if I am actively editing, I cannot always access my email and it may be a day or two before you receive a reply.


Recent speedy deletion of a certain spam site

Hi! I just noticed that you deleted Talk:Www. (...) .com per G8. Was I wrong to tag it G11? I was considering G8, but I found that G11 would apply even for a talk page. Thanks in advance. decltype (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ralph Eckardt

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ralph Eckardt, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Eckardt. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Edcolins (talk) 20:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mark Blaxill

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mark Blaxill, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Blaxill. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Edcolins (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

iPlotz deletion

How can this be added back in - does someone else not connected to the company have to recreate it?.. The information also had published articles, one of which was a major review site, so that handles notability. This page followed exactly the format of other sites, so either they should be deleted or this should be added back. Please advise Markvtc (talk) 23:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vertica deletion

Hi Lectonar, Can you please consider undeleting the Vertica page, or send me the code for the deleted page and explain what changes you suggest be made to avoid re-deletion? I don't understand why it was flagged as blatant advertising...the page existed for 2 years, had many community edits, many published external articles, and many pages about similar/competitive products still exist:

Danke, Andy

PS--I sent you an email 2 days ago with additional background on the page —Preceding unsigned comment added by DatabACE (talk • contribs) 13:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

article restored; don't know what took me...

Concerning Cherokee

Ok. Just wanted to note that I reverted the page back to its original form, asking him several times to take it to the talk page. He is removing content without just cause or discussion on the talk page, So i believe that it needs to be reverted. If you believe that I should just leave his changes, I will be more than happy to. Thanks, Ono (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This isnt the first run in I have had with people removing content from the Cherokee page because they didnt believe it should be there lol. This isn't the first time I have been drawn into an edit war between two other editors, and I always manage to get to involved. Thanks for the advice, Ono (talk) 14:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alastair Galbraith

Afrrernoon Lectonar, sorry to bother you, but do you think you could delete Alastair Galbraith (musician), so as I can: move Alastair Galbraith, there and then make Alastair Galbraith into a disambig for Alastair Galbraith (musician) and Alastair Galbraith (actor), again, sorry to bother you, just that I have to leave soon and I'd like to get this cleared up, thanks so much. SpitfireTally-ho! 12:44, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

done...
Thanks a lot, hugely appreciated SpitfireTally-ho! 12:52, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Protection

Thanks very much! I was just about to request it at WP:RPP. Thanks for processing my reports at WP:AIV so quickly and effienctly, you're awesome :D cf38talk 13:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:92.238.168.136

I saw you blocked the above IP indefinitely and disabled its talk page editing. Are there some special circumstances with this IP? Because per blocking policy dealing with IPs, IP addresses should rarely, if ever, be blocked indefinitely. Thanks! KnightLago (talk) 14:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dropped it to two months, disabled talk page editing, and left notes in the block log and on the talk page to email the unblock list in order to contest or if there is an error. Thanks! KnightLago (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Certpoint Systems

Notability of CERTPOINT Systems

A tag has been placed on CERTPOINT Systems requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

How can I avoid getting this message? There are other companies like this on Wikipedia. Do I need to provide links?

Train2009 (talk) 16:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

answered

Recent speedy deletion

A request for an article relating to criminalwatchdog was recently deleted at your request. Please explain why the article in question is not appropriate but articles such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalahari_Tea are?

I am eager to understand your guidelines.

thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cranedr (talk • contribs) 17:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

answered
response

Unfortunately I do not agree. One example of "notability" is the entry in the LA House Of Representatives journal regarding the use of criminalwatchdog for new state nurses.

This is indeed a notable Corporation and believe it does indeed warrant an entry. Cranedr (talk) 14:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BakerPlatt

Hi Lectonar. I'm struggling to know why you've deleted BakerPlatt. It's my first attempt at creating a page on Wikipedia - and I was disappointed to see that it has been removed, despite being comparable to other offshore law firm stub entries. Can you allow me to access the text again and give me some pointers as to how I can prove that it's a genuinely noteworthy submission?

Thanks,

Jason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonmackenzie (talk • contribs) 09:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. What is Jersey Business Review? Are you referring to the Jersey Evening Post annual Business Review? I'm feeling under undue scrutiny and persecution! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonmackenzie (talk • contribs) 12:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am categorically NOT working for Jersey Business Review. I have historically contributed to that publication. I am interested in publishing noteworthy items on Wikipedia (never having done so in the past) and chose a firm that is presently working on two high profile, landmark cases in the jurisdiction in which I live as my first foray. I feel that you are being unjustifiably censorious. All I wish to do is be guided as to how to publish articles that are notable, impartial and significant. I had no idea it would be so difficult! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonmackenzie (talk • contribs) 12:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Just realised that I should sign off on comments. Jasonmackenzie (talk) 14:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tomi tour

Hi Lectonar, could you please copy text of speedily deleted page Tomi tour to my sandbox? Tomi tour is one of the largest Czech travel agencies, has a negative equity (mentioned in the deleted article), is promoted by former Czech senator etc. I'll add more sources to the text before creating the article again. Thank you JanSuchy (talk) 13:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

done...

Another one

Hi. You just deleted Ogyen Tulku Rinpoche as speedy G12 copyvio of http://www.palyul.org/eng_biotulku_ogyen.htm, there is another one from the same user also here: H._E._Ogyen_Tulku_Rinpoche with the same content. -Owlmonkey (talk) 16:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:09, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ecoproximity

Hi, regarding the OR you just deleted, I was wondering if it was Portuguese or actually Catalan? On a second look it looked it bit weird with z and j. De728631 (talk) 13:31, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hah, I can imagine how one could get confused in Brussels! Cheers, De728631 (talk) 13:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
First of all I pointed them to the Catalan Wiki. And then they might see from the redlink how their page is no longer available for translation. I guess we don't need to do anything more about it. De728631 (talk) 13:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection of User talk:Cf38

User talk pages aren't protected upon request unless there is persistent vandalism, since they are a crucial point of contact for various users, including anonymous contributors. The only vandalism I see was from one particular IP, so such a thing certainly doesn't and didn't warrant protection. Would you please elaborate on your rationale for protection? Thanks. — neuro(talk)(review) 18:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

foreign language redirect

...Or why not simply read WP:CSD#R3 before tagging. What a blunder :) decltype (talk) 10:26, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aspire Princess

Not that I'm going to contest this deletion, but you do realise that films/fictional works are not eligible for A7, right? Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Oh don't worry, I actually spent a few minutes to see if they were speedy eligible, and finally went to PROD it, only to discover you'd beaten me to the punch! I agree that their deletion was probably best for the project and can be justified as WP:IAR, and I think most admins would agree with you, .just wanted to make sure you knew that deleting films as A7 would normally be controversial. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Anon (not so now) vandal

Hi there LECTONAR, VASCO from Portugal here,

regarding this report (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Anon_vandal), which led to you protect all four articles, i have bad news: The anon has registered, under the account Georgios21 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Georgios21, i am not 100% sure it his him, but 99,99999999%, as this person continues to operate almost solely on AEK Athens FC soccer players).

Bearing in mind the four articles which i presented as evidence, at least in this, Arnaldo Edi Lopes da Silva, he proceeded to enter again, remove true info in infobox, also messing with his height and age, which can be confirmed at ZEROZERO.PT link provided (by me) - see this (http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Arnaldo_Edi_Lopes_da_Silva&action=history). What can be done?

Have a great week, Vasco Amaral - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

replied...

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pixie Lott

Hi there,

I have been advised by User:DAJF to ask you to unblock the article Pixie Lott as I have demonstrated the required notability to warrant a Wikipedia article - Could you please inform me of how to proceed with the publishing of my article?

Many thanks,

Ben.


Kevin Burant

you recently deleted my page Kevin Burant... if you could just send me a copy of it that'd be appreciated Jasoncaruso (talk) 19:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good (team)work

Hi there LECTONAR, VASCO here,

Please see my message above, it should be a few meters above. In case you don't need to refresh your memory, just dropping by to thank your input (blocking vandal, or "blocking", since you protected pages, and your subsequent message). Nice teamwork my friend...Could this be the last vandal on WP ever? If you don't mind me saying...LOL! Gotta admire my naiveness though :)

Cheers, keep it up, from Portugal, Vasco Amaral - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 23:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Pal

thanks for sayinh hi btw Can i got you if i ever need questions answered :) Dog Scream (talk) 08:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Silicon Blue

the article you just deleted, it is about the new company producing FPGA devices, the information defenetly belongs to wikipedia, It is my fault i wasnt able to fill in more information at once, i created the page for later editing and left with my kids to the doctor. Now i wanted to add more content but the pages was deleted.

FPGA's are very special electronic devices and there are only 7 companies world wide producing them, 2 of the 7 are completly missing from wikipedia, one of them is Silicon Blue the other is Acronix

as note I am not involved with Silicon Blue except that i am using their products and have deep technical knowledge about FPGAs in general

sorry again that i did not provide enougth articel content at page creation time —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trioflex (talk • contribs) 09:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I added the references within few minutes from the page creation? Wasnt that fast enough? Sorry if so.. So what should i do? just recreate again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trioflex (talk • contribs) 09:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Lectonar,

if there are 7 companies world wide producing FPGA's does it mean only the first 5 can be included in Wikipedia? This sounds like unfair policy to me, but maybe the community thinks that only 5 are eliglible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trioflex (talk • contribs) 11:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

signed Trioflex (talk) 11:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lazar vehicle

The author give me permission to publish images and text without the copyright,please contact the author on email:slobodankrstic@ecdlcentar.com ,also i have permission of SDPR to public this PDF text http://www.ecdlcentar.com/baza/ecdl_informacije/y_report/y_report_br26.pdf --Boksi (talk) 12:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of page: Erin Ketterman

In this recently deleted page, the reason for deletion was because it was an "Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject."


What I don't understand is the logic behind this. Is George Bush not a real person? Is Zinedine Zidane not a real person?


The other point of logic I don't understand is the part about indicating "the importance...of the subject." In my article, the importance was very lucidly stated as her being a top contributor to a high school in Phoenix, Arizona.


How, then, are either of these reasons for deletion justified? Thank you.

Dbestarchitect (talk) 17:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

G. Shanmugam

Hi

I honestly could not see anything that struck me as notable about this professor - all-round top-notch human being though he seems to be! pablohablo. 15:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Kayako article by User:hatter87

I am not sure why my article was deleted (having checked the content guidelines to which you referred me). I created a "Kayako" article (who make help desk software I use, as well as my University) having seen Comparison_of_issue_tracking_systems, and missing links (red nodes) to Kayako on a few other Wikipedia articles. I also note that Kayako has been featured in the popular presses many times (i.e. it is not a fly-by-night company), including for reasons including helping push forward the open source software initiative. I believe that the article I created contained useful content, especially when compared to other similar articles: TechExcel_Software, Zendesk, Eventum, CreationFlow, C.Support, Atadesk - some of these are one-liners at best! I suspect I have been flagged up here because I am a new registration. This is understandable, especially with the suspicions this rouses. However, I believe it is in the interests of the community to pass fair judgement on the content of the article based entirely on its own merits - not on my registration date. Hatter87 (talk) 16:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have just seen the deletion log - it appears I am not the only one who have tried to create a Kayako article in the past. Hatter87 (talk) 16:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:V

Thanks for s-protecting this. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 01:15, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nurvesoft

Hi. I noticed that you protected "Nurvesoft" from being created by anyone but an admin due to its being created repeatedly. You may also wish to do this with "Harry poller" that keeps getting created over and over again by Harry Poller. Cheers, --ThoseStarsBurnLikeDiamonds stargaze 12:36, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of "April Maglalang" page

I marked the website and was my first time. I noticed you were the one to delete it. Did i tag appropriatly? Avatar 06349 (talk) 12:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


deletion of "Filippo Tron" page

I provided source references for this historical figure, who I noticed on his father's page had no article. The source I used has been dubbed "The Standard Venetian History in English" by The Times. Hereditary lines of doges were a constant source of tension within the republic of Venice, and any proposed continued line - especially if favored by the citizens of Venice - is certainly noteworthy. Furthermore, his unique cause of death definitely deserves mention. Since clearly there are not many Venetian scholars maintaining the finer points of the republic's history on Wikipedia, this may be the only mention of this historical figure for quite some time. As for the relevance of Filippo Tron himself, if we are to include losing US presidential candidates on Wikipedia, why then not include losing candidates for the doseship? Are we so culturally and historically exclusive? I fear a policy such as this will lead to the deletion of John Kerry in 100 years, for example. (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:55, 7 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Drake (entertainer)

Is there supposed to be a lock at the top of the page? Or does it not matter? Blackjays1 (talk) 14:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Bollier Deleted

Recently, the article [Thomas Bollier] was deleted through the speedy deletion process. I have been informed that you are able to produce a copy of the deleted article using the 'userfy' process. I would greatly appreciate if you could email me a copy of the deleted article, 'Thomas Bollier. Thank You. --Basicallymadness (talk) 21:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jeff G./sockproblems

Hi. Given User:Ward3001/Sandbox#Tweety21, User talk:Jeff G./Archives/2009/February#Page_deletion, and this log, I'd like to request that you undelete the subject page and then revert my deletion request for it. Thanks.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Farda Gadirov

Same as your reason on Talk:Tim Kretschmer, I think we should get rid of article Farda Gadirov, merge with Azerbaijan State Oil Academy shootings, no other claims of notable beyond the shooting. 198.188.96.4 (talk) 22:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Autovermietung will

Curse you, bah I go and put it on the needs trans page and you delete it in a half a second, darn meddling admins... LOL. Ah well, I suppose I'll go off and find something else to do. Whispering 09:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Recent speedy deletion of Feefo article

Why has this article been deleted? It covers an innotive internet tool but does not actively promote or advertise it.

answered on users talk-page....

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

QUESTION ABOUT A DELETION

Hi, I was following through a link for Ted Allbeury and I was amazed to find that this bio once existed but that it had been deleted. The person in question is notable, he was a well published author and broadcaster in the UK. Since your name came up as the person who had deleted the earlier article (I have no idea what that was), I thought that I would check with you first to see if you have any objection to the creation of a new biographical article. --Fk27jh (talk) 00:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ogier (law firm)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ogier (law firm), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogier (law firm). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cmichael (talk) 03:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 11:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You were vandalised

Your "about me page" got vandalised, I reverted the vandalism and left the bad guy a warning. -- Drappel (talk) 13:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation;;;;;

Gregor Thesher Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

REDELETED :))

New&Confused

I just got the message that a page I created had got deleted due to : (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement). The page conserned the Norwegian architects Jarmund / Vigsnæs I wondered if you could explain the reason for deleting this site, as i did not include anything that falls under copyright law; no images, no quotes etc. If I understood the guidelines correctly only the bits of text/bits of the contribution that does fall under somebody elses' copyright is what is in danger of being removed, but in this case the whole article got removed. It would be great if someone out there could explain the reason for the deletion. Thankyou Sknj (talk) 08:05, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

answered on users talk-page

When is it appropriate....

To refactor another editors talk page? [[1]] I have left a lvl 1 warning on this page for refactoring another users talk page that was clarly not vandalism. I have since been told that because I have a colorful history it is an invalid warning. I would like to have a few admin go and comment one way or another to this as I believe my actions were not only appropriate but very moderated. Thank You.Hell In A Bucket (talk) 09:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the situation if you wish, however the prevailing opinion has been if you make 60,000 edits it's ok to discount others polite opinion because "they have bit a newbie (once) and have poor grammer." This wasn't a personal issue but a disturbing attitude trend.Hell In A Bucket (talk) 11:55, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Galonga (talk) 13:55, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Galonga (talk) 13:56, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

could you please explain why you deleted onehourflex?

did you bother to at least check the links provided?

considering the speed you deleted the article no you did not

if you had you´d see they were from LEADING media on the biofuels arena

so what else is necessary? to win the nobel prize?

besides it was still under CONSTRUCTION!

Please check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DWZ#toc

tell me EXACTLY what did the article needed then! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galonga (talk • contribs) 13:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

iWantGreatCare

Thought that the iwantgreatcare article was balanced, as it included scathing criticism of the service? Let me know how you think the article could be made less advert-y, I took some info from the site and the rest from The Guardian and other third party providers. Thanks 27.oma (talk) 15:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 31 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 18:02, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I answered TWICE your email with days of separation and yet you ignored it. Aren´t you supposed to be kind and stuff?

EMAIL I SENT:

This is to let you know that the company you deleted is already in the Top 100 biotech company by Always Going Green (http://alwayson.goingon.com/permalink/post/31757)

It is listed along with companies such as TESLA which I'm sure you know well!

Now, if even that does not count I can only speculate you are really out of your mind!!

either way I agree that you are much more approachable than 99% of the wikiadmins there and I thank the time you took to send me an email

cheers!

alvaro


, and we are going to speak in the "Global China Business Meeting" in Lisbon in November 14 and in the "Biofuels Markets Mexico & Central America" in Mexico City in October 7th.

--- Em qua, 2/9/09, Lectonar <Lectonar@web.de> escreveu:

> De: Lectonar <Lectonar@web.de> > Assunto: Wikipedia e-mail > Para: "Galonga" <galonga@yahoo.com> > Data: Quarta-feira, 2 de Setembro de 2009, 10:56 > A good day to you, > > sorry to come back to you so late....I've chosen this way > to answer you as I'm experiencing problems with my provider, > and wiki-editing is near impossible for me at the moment. > > As to your question about the deletion: > > I did follow the links and read them, and I'm still not > convinced that the links provided do prove the notability of > the subject. Also, the sources may or may not be top-notch > in their filed, but this does not necessarily imply that > they are reliable sources for wikipedia (have a look at the > appropriate page on-wiki). So I stand by my decision. As DWK > pointed out to you: you may have my deletion reviewed at > WP:DRV, and of course I would stand by the decision made > there. > > On a side note: you may, or may not, have noted (by reading > through my userpage and my talk-page) that I'm very > approachable (and don't really mind being yelled at or > treated uncivilly), but take a care how you approach other > wiki user; your first comments on my talk-page could have > spawned a warning or a block from other admins. > > Cheers > > Lectonar

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lectonar&oldid=312234590"