Jump to content

Talk:Typebar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Raycy (talk | contribs) at 03:37, 11 September 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Typebar's illustrating picture is not suited to the evidence for David's statements on two points.

  • Jamming typebars on front-strike machine and with too much tangles
    Jamming typebars on front-strike machine and with too much tangles

This picture is front-strike machine's and staged event 'cause of too much tangles. Jamming typebars' picture should be on up-strike-machine's and during actual operation. It's because this picture should illustrate David's statements. The type-writing machine at prototype era, it should have up-strike mechanism. --Raycy (talk) 17:07, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
David wrote new doc that is David(2000)[1], and I haven't read though. It should be checked because his "jamming problems led to QWERTY" theory was on suspicion for a while.--Raycy (talk) 18:15, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Associate Professor Koichi Yasuoka[2] points out two facts that should be proven ,

1. The existence of the nuisance of type-bar collisions [3]

2. Strong regulation between keys' layout and type-bars' arrangement [4]

,during the prototype-machine era.--Raycy (talk) 18:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yasuoka also says up-strike machine's type-bar should never been called as 'arm'. I gess it might be called as 'arm'.--Raycy (talk) 18:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ David, Paul A. (2000), "Path dependence, its critics and the quest for ‘historical economics’"
  2. ^ http://www.blogger.com/profile/12846940796427466327
  3. ^ Current(1949)footnote26
  4. ^ Current(1949)footnote22
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Typebar&oldid=313126693"