Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Border history of Serbia

Border history of Serbia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could've almost speedily deleted this for having little context, but I'm bringing it here in case someone wants to improve it. The article is just a gallery of maps with not much coherent structure, so it's more appropriate for Commons. It's been like this since 2005, so I doubt this can substantially improve anytime soon. Also, the same arguments in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Border history of Romania (second nomination) can be applied here. Spellcast (talk) 22:51, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At the moment there is no article - just a repository of images! The article could be rescued if someone had the expertise though Francium12 23:11, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 23:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 23:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Totally a non-article. Pemberton08 (talk) 10:14, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Userfication as could have been done originally to avoid a AFD. Ikip (talk) 13:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- This is not an article but a collection of maps. As such it might be instructive, but it needs some substantive text to go with it. "Serbia" has meant different things at different times. An article (with text to explain the maps) might be useful, or is that already in somethign like "History of Serbia"? CErtainly, this article cannot survive as it is. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Even if some maps have mistakes, I believe the article can be "saved" with maps' explanations from experts.--LittleTony (talk) 03:18, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]