Jump to content

User talk:Martin.Budden

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JackyR (talk | contribs) at 23:33, 14 December 2005 (Genarp Parish). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This may be a little late, but, == Welcome! ==

Hi Martin.Budden! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! →Journalist >>talk<< 22:19, 1 October 2005 (UTC) [reply]


Your work

Hi, me again. Just wanted to tell you to keep up the good work. In just one week, you have made over 470 edits! →Journalist >>talk<< 22:26, 1 October 2005 (UTC) [reply]

Pamri • Talk 17:36, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gurmukhi Script

Hi

Is there a particular reason why Gurmukhi has been moved to Gurmukhi script? The only thing that the word Gurmukhi relates to is the script so should it not stay as it is (like Devanagari) ? Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 16:54, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sukh, I agree that the suffix "script" is not strictly necessary, but I think it adds clarity. It also conforms to the naming of articles about other scripts. Compare with languages: the title of language articles is normally of the form "XXX language", even when the suffix language is not necessary (although again there are exceptions, such as Hindi). Additionally the use of the term "script" in the article title makes it easier when you are doing actions that apply to a lot of articles, such as categorising them, or editing lists etc. (For the record I also think Devanagari should be changed to Devanagari script...)Martin.Budden 17:33, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Monarch templates

HI, I'll see what I can do about the font sizes. As for the title, I think it's probably OK to leave it. Actually, I would like to see Template:Infobox Monarch used on all the British monarch pages. I don't much care for the British Royalty Template:House of Stuart style templates, there's no need to list everybody's children. --JW1805 17:39, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Genarp Parish

Came to this article thru' Random Article: what country is it Genarp in?!! :-) JackyR 23:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Martin.Budden&oldid=31394355"