User talk:Dkeditor

Hello, Dkeditor! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! RP459 (talk) 13:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

RP459 (talk) 14:58, 12 September 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Grm logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Grm logo.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply by Dkeditor (talk) 12:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC) I have provided copyright information for logo currently being used (see [1]. I hope that's OK. If not, I would appreciate some feedback. Thanks.Dkeditor (talk) 12:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Global Risk Management

The article Global Risk Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company, Google news search finds no relevant coverage fails WP:COMPANY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RP459 (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply by Dkeditor (talk) 19:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Hello RP459. I've removed the notice, having (in my opinion) improved the article by adding more notes and sources to underline the notability of the company. I'm still working on the page, and adding more sources as time allows.[reply]

I can understand why the notability question arose, having conducted a Google News search myself. It did throw up a lot of results for this company, but almost all of the content was hidden on subscription-based industry websites, such as Bunkerworld. A general Google web search is somewhat more revealing, although the generic nature of the company's name requires a lot of sifting.

On reflection, I ought to have collected a larger number of English language sources before composing the page, rather than the other way around (as I later learned in the "Create a page" guidelines). There are many more Danish language sources I have at hand, but I think to have added more of them would have been counterproductive, from a usability point of view. Better left for a Danish language version.

Well, I'm a beginner at this. Next time I'll know. I'd really appreciate any further observations, tips and/or feedback on this page if you have any. Thanks. Dkeditor (talk) 19:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

................

To quote wikipedia itself, "neutrality trumps popularity." As mentioned previously, the Google News search fails to reveal a lot of trade media sources that are subscription-based (particularly common in the maritime business). A regular Google web search reveals a number of these in regards to the company in question. Google News search also omits non-English language news items about this company -- which is, after all, based in Denmark.

"Raw "hit" (search result) count is a very crude measure of importance. Some unimportant subjects have many "hits", some notable ones have few or none..." from [the Search Engline Test page]

In order to establish notability. I've therefore continued to add more "Notes" to the page, which now include verifiable sources such as Denmark's national news agency, several national newspapers, and non-subscription trade media websites in English and Danish. I've chosen a spread of dates, from 2006 to today (Bunker Index is one of several daily online bunker sites that carry Global Risk Management oil price assessments. Unfortunately, the others are subscription based).

A word about the Danish sources: A number of the sources I've included are articles by national newspapers using Global Risk Management for quotes and analysis on shifts in the oil price. I think that adds even more weight to the notability of the company. If in doubt, perhaps it might be useful to call in a Scandinavian editor to verify the notability of the Danish sources.

I'm a newcomer to this, so could somebody give me feedback to this reply i.e. is it posted in the right place, and in the right manner.

Thanks. Dkeditor (talk) 10:59, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CONFLICT#Financial

I noticed this edit [2] and thought that I should point out WP:CONFLICT#Financial, while there is no express policy against paid editing, there are certain things to watch out for if you are indeed paid editing... RP459 (talk) 17:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply by Dkeditor (talk) 12:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Thanks RP459 for the heads up on that. I am aware of Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest -- including the financial aspect of it. Any editing I do on Wikipedia is completely voluntary and, I hope my peers will agree, written from a neutral point of view. If subjectivity has crept into an edit of mine, please let's discuss. Thanks.Dkeditor (talk) 12:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to discuss, I just noticed the edit and wanted to point it out... Thanks for the reply. RP459 (talk) 13:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Global Risk Management

An article that you have been involved in editing, Global Risk Management, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Risk Management. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RP459 (talk) 00:05, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]