Wikipedia talk:Tutorial (historical)/Talk pages
Template:Please leave this line alone (tutorial sandbox talk heading)
Test topic on the talk page
This is a test topic, added with the new section button, and signed with four tildes like this : Example (talk) 16:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Is there nothing better?
Is this dreadful markup-language editor the only way to write Wikipedia articles? Are there third-party tools that let people work in a civilized way? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyon Steve (talk • contribs) 23:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- bab
- anchor
- watford
terry nutkins and that23:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MattyHebbo (talk • contribs)
- good day* —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.17.226.195 (talk) 16:26, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- hey there, i want to say
- hello
- i love you
- tell me your name
- Bsgayda (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, three things:
- one
- one and a half
- two
- indenting is fun and correct
Alevay (talk) 16:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC) It is getting:
- stiffer
- stiffer
- stiffer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeatex (talk • contribs) 22:07, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I think Wiki commands are
- hard
- confusing
- why not use copy and paste from word?
- time consuming!
--LauraFinch11 (talk) 14:05, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- I kind of agree, but it'll be nice to be able to
- Edit bad grammar
- Correct spelling
- Do other stuff
--Fkh9 (talk) 20:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm not a huge fan of Wiki mark-up myself.
- Indent!
- Bullet!
- Number!
--Jsf26 (talk) 04:33, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Can anyone have fun with this stuff?
- 1 Only if they have nothing else to do.
- 2 Like learning new languages.
- 3 Are bored
This is impossible,
- How will I remember all this?
- Why am I putting myself thru this?
Cdonaltc (talk) 01:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Test: AdamJP
Blah
- blah blah
- blah blah blah
Stuff
- stuff and
- stuff and
- stuff and
- stuff and
- stuff
Numbers
- one
- two
- sub two
- three
- Lea Orr (talk) 19:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- testing of indention
- indented further
- testing of indention
- first topic
- second topic
- sub second topic
Gypsy77 (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Way
I mean I don't understand what all of this means.
- Its crazy
- Why i just dont know
[Chair] I site Ice —Preceding unsigned comment added by PlatoRoy (talk • contribs) 18:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- so
- where
-
- amd how
- do I cut in?
- this is so like writing poetry in the eecummings style
- What I wonder is if Airboy two fell in love with Val., his father's lover who had been in supended animation, is that Oedipal or not? Knighthawk 2
- do I cut in?
- amd how
- I am robot Dotconnect (talk) 21:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Say
- Words
- You
- I love you
HIS33809RD14347 (talk) 00:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
I have a question. Isn't it supposed to be that blah-blah-blah is equal to halb-halb-halb? --Impuissant (talk) 07:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Christina Colalillo
Cassiegz (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)===University of Pittsburgh===
- Bachelor of Communications
- Is that a BA or a BS?
Astrofish (talk) 12:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think it does Cassiegz (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC).
- It sure does!ChristinaColalillo (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- woohoo! 21:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.135.92.12 (talk)
- I'm still confused with this time signature thing so I'm going to try again! Cassiegz (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Cassiegz(talk)Cassiegz (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)(UTC)
- ok I'm trying again Cassiegz (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'm still confused with this time signature thing so I'm going to try again! Cassiegz (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Cassiegz(talk)Cassiegz (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)(UTC)
- woohoo! 21:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.135.92.12 (talk)
- and again. Cassiegz (talk) 16:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- It sure does!ChristinaColalillo (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- I think it does Cassiegz (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC).
All this text is totally throwing me off Baanaleot (talk) 15:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Baanaleot
TEST
- (^v^)
- (T^T)
- h*r
end
Another Test
Another test
- indent one
- indent again
- 1 number
- 2 number
- Let me add to this test the face that KiD CuDi is da goodest.
- She Came Along ft. Sharam
- Dat New New
- Down and Out
- The Prayer
- 67.159.95.0 (talk) 01:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
AND ANOTHER TEST
- THIS IS FOREIGN TO ME
- TOTALLY FOREIGN
- INCREDIBLY FOREIGN
- TOTALLY FOREIGN
- First things First
- Second things second
- Don't even go there
Writer1AB (talk) 22:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
End Another Test
Lmthomson (talk) 00:58, 28 June 2009 (UTC)lthomson
experiment
- another one
Tell09 (talk) 15:23, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Test
Test test
- Test
- Test
- Test
- 1
- 2
- 3
=== End Test === 173.105.250.202 (talk) 21:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
mean, really. not really, I'm a programmer, so this is really no problem. Testing123 (talk) 02:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that with our level of technology today that a better editor should be implemented but I think the ease and simplicity of the wiki code is perfect for entry level programing. Trent McCrow (talk) 05:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- It's called an otcothorpe ? Woah. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.88.159.18 (talk) 03:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Who knew? Davesmith au (talk) 01:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- God knew. God knew it was an octothorpe. Queen Spiral (talk) 12:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Who knew? Davesmith au (talk) 01:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's called an otcothorpe ? Woah. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.88.159.18 (talk) 03:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that with our level of technology today that a better editor should be implemented but I think the ease and simplicity of the wiki code is perfect for entry level programing. Trent McCrow (talk) 05:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
ya LieutenantLeo (talk)
- More to come :D AlexDuarte (talk) 08:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- you suck
- srsly, and this is why
- youre a programmer
- youre in a sandbox
- you dont have a bullet list —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.210.202.172 (talk) 23:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- youre in a sandbox
- ok here we go...--Bigshoulderscreator (talk) 17:03, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Like this?
- Indents like this
- and like this?
- Yes. Like this. Hart2Harts (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- and like this?
Bullets like
- this
- this
- and this?
Numbers like
- this
- and this?
- and also this?
Signing off like this? Oodles More the biggest idiot ever (talk) 22:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Awright!
- What prevent me from modifying other people's comments? Jonathan dumas (talk) 16:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Nothing, as far as I * can tell! Queen Spiral (talk) 12:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- This is interesting! I want to bullet the upper statement for fun and see what is going to happen!
I am new (deletion test)--Deathoftheworld (talk) 18:10, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Is it really THAT stupid? Hart2Harts (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
So this might make sense but my concerns are:
- i'll get lost in the "conversation"
- i'll miss any number of comments made
- i'll get too bullet/number crazy
out. Hart2Harts (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- LMAO. This tutorial board is extremely funny. lol.
- --Kurtcool2 (talk) 12:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. It is that.
- Potatoe.
- Space potatoe.
- Greenlobe
- Bluerash
- Subspace potatoe
- Queen Spiral (talk) 12:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. It is that.
Another test
Notables
- Notable 1
- Notable 2
- Notable 3
- Notable 2
- 1Notable 1
- 2Notable 2
- 3Notable 3
- 2Notable 2
- Notable 3
- Notable 1
- Notable 2
I don't get the numbers, I'll be back ZVNC (talk) 02:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Notable 1
- Notable 2
- Notable. 2.5
- Notable 2.25
- Notable. 2.5
- Notable 3
Now I get it! ZVNC (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thank God you now get it,I am still trying to.
- I have list of things I would like to do
- Read as much as i can
- Take time to understand
- What I have read
- Assimilate it
- Digest it, then regurgitate it.
Ochawhite (talk) 12:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
TEST! TEST! IGLOO TEST!Guardian entei (talk) 12:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- This is my test
- --Arvid Carlander (talk) 23:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
More Tests
Yep, More
- Uno
- Dos
- Tres
AlexDuarte (talk) 08:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Sargentprivate (talk) 12:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
I confused 4 of this: ~ with 4 of this: * -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guardian entei (talk • contribs) 12:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC) hmm this is kinda tricky 04:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.1.73 (talk)
What do you mean, Header?
And a Sub-Header?
What kind of text editing system is this?
- (A decent one)
- This
- Sign
- Has a strange name
- Give the bullets a chance!
- I completely agree
Bullets get no chance.
- They should!
- Definitely not
- Should.
--SixtySuit (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Could? RobertLClegg (talk) 00:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- tHIS
- Is
- A
- Thing
- That
- is
- FUNNY!
''''BOLD!?'''' fu+Q —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amazio (talk • contribs) 23:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
It's quite difficult to remember editing rules
- first time
- second time
- third time
PaintAurora (talk) 10:14, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Yet another test.
Does anyone else have problems remembering all the proper codes?
- One colon for one indentation;
- Two for two;
- And so on.
- Two for two;
Now for bullet points.
- One asterisk for one bullet point.
- Two for two;
- Etc.
- Two for two;
And finally, numbering:
- One number sign for one number;
- Two for two;
- more for more!--Ekias (talk) 22:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Two for two;
First comment Sargentprivate (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Second commentSargentprivate (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Reply with unordered list:
- First
- Second
- About the second
- Also about the second
- Third Sargentprivate (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Reply with unordered list:
Something new Sargentprivate (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Reply with ol: Sargentprivate (talk)
- First
- Second
- About the second
- Also about the second
- Third
People are making no sense here... lol NinjaTweak (talk) 17:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- If it made sense, it would be an actual Wiki page now wouldn't it ; ) HA! NinjaBack!! RobertLClegg (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- These can be found in a first aid box
- Scissors
- Spirit
- cotton wool
Ochawhite (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes no one makes sense here so lets blab! User:Ebdullah khan
- The following are my favorite bikes. Here is a self explanatory chart of the fastes on a quartermile
- honda CBR 600
- suzuki GSXR 600
- Yamaha YZF 600
- Kawasaki ZXR 636 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebdullah Khan (talk • contribs) 20:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yamaha YZF 600
- suzuki GSXR 600
00:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC)