Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Tutorial (historical)/Talk pages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bsgayda (talk | contribs) at 05:02, 19 September 2009 (Is there nothing better?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Please leave this line alone (tutorial sandbox talk heading)

Test topic on the talk page

This is a test topic, added with the new section button, and signed with four tildes like this : Example (talk) 16:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Is there nothing better?

Is this dreadful markup-language editor the only way to write Wikipedia articles? Are there third-party tools that let people work in a civilized way? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyon Steve (talkcontribs) 23:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll never remember all these

bab
anchor
watford

terry nutkins and that23:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MattyHebbo (talkcontribs)


hey there, i want to say
  • hello
  • i love you
    • tell me your name
Bsgayda (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, three things:

  • one
    • one and a half
  • two
indenting is fun and correct

Alevay (talk) 16:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC) It is getting:[reply]

I think Wiki commands are

  • hard
  • confusing
    • why not use copy and paste from word?
  • time consuming!

--LauraFinch11 (talk) 14:05, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I kind of agree, but it'll be nice to be able to
  • Edit bad grammar
  • Correct spelling
  • Do other stuff

--Fkh9 (talk) 20:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a huge fan of Wiki mark-up myself.

Indent!
  • Bullet!
  1. Number!

--Jsf26 (talk) 04:33, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone have fun with this stuff?

  1. 1 Only if they have nothing else to do.
  1. 2 Like learning new languages.
  1. 3 Are bored

This is impossible,

  • How will I remember all this?
  • Why am I putting myself thru this?

Cdonaltc (talk) 01:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test: AdamJP

Blah

blah blah
blah blah blah

Stuff

  • stuff and
    • stuff and
      • stuff and
  • stuff

Numbers

  1. one
  2. two
    1. sub two
  3. three
Lea Orr (talk) 19:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
testing of indention
indented further
  1. first topic
  2. second topic
    1. sub second topic

Gypsy77 (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Way

I mean I don't understand what all of this means.

  1. Its crazy
  • Why i just dont know

[Chair] I site Ice —Preceding unsigned comment added by PlatoRoy (talkcontribs) 18:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

so
where
amd how
do I cut in?
this is so like writing poetry in the eecummings style
What I wonder is if Airboy two fell in love with Val., his father's lover who had been in supended animation, is that Oedipal or not? Knighthawk 2
  1. Say
  2. Words
  3. You
  • I love you

HIS33809RD14347 (talk) 00:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question. Isn't it supposed to be that blah-blah-blah is equal to halb-halb-halb? --Impuissant (talk) 07:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christina Colalillo

Cassiegz (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)===University of Pittsburgh===[reply]

Bachelor of Communications
Is that a BA or a BS?

Astrofish (talk) 12:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it does Cassiegz (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]
It sure does!ChristinaColalillo (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
woohoo! 21:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.135.92.12 (talk)
I'm still confused with this time signature thing so I'm going to try again! Cassiegz (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Cassiegz(talk)Cassiegz (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)(UTC)[reply]
ok I'm trying again Cassiegz (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
and again. Cassiegz (talk) 16:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All this text is totally throwing me off Baanaleot (talk) 15:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Baanaleot[reply]

TEST

  1. (^v^)
  2. (T^T)
  3. h*r

end

Another Test

Another test

indent one
indent again
  • 1 number
  • 2 number
Let me add to this test the face that KiD CuDi is da goodest.
  • She Came Along ft. Sharam
  • Dat New New
  • Down and Out
  • The Prayer
67.159.95.0 (talk) 01:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


AND ANOTHER TEST

THIS IS FOREIGN TO ME
TOTALLY FOREIGN
INCREDIBLY FOREIGN
  • First things First
  • Second things second
    • Don't even go there

Writer1AB (talk) 22:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

End Another Test

Lmthomson (talk) 00:58, 28 June 2009 (UTC)lthomson[reply]

experiment

another one

Tell09 (talk) 15:23, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test

Test test

Test
Test
Test
  • 1
    • 2
  • 3

=== End Test === 173.105.250.202 (talk) 21:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

mean, really. not really, I'm a programmer, so this is really no problem. Testing123 (talk) 02:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that with our level of technology today that a better editor should be implemented but I think the ease and simplicity of the wiki code is perfect for entry level programing. Trent McCrow (talk) 05:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's called an otcothorpe ? Woah. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.88.159.18 (talk) 03:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Who knew? Davesmith au (talk) 01:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
God knew. God knew it was an octothorpe. Queen Spiral (talk) 12:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ya LieutenantLeo (talk)

More to come :D AlexDuarte (talk) 08:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
you suck
srsly, and this is why

Like this?

Indents like this
and like this?
Yes. Like this. Hart2Harts (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bullets like

  • this
  • this
    • and this?

Numbers like

  1. this
    1. and this?
  2. and also this?

Signing off like this? Oodles More the biggest idiot ever (talk) 22:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awright!

What prevent me from modifying other people's comments? Jonathan dumas (talk) 16:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is interesting! I want to bullet the upper statement for fun and see what is going to happen!

Oodles More (talk)

I am new (deletion test)--Deathoftheworld (talk) 18:10, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really THAT stupid? Hart2Harts (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So this might make sense but my concerns are:

  • i'll get lost in the "conversation"
  • i'll miss any number of comments made
  • i'll get too bullet/number crazy

out. Hart2Harts (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO. This tutorial board is extremely funny. lol.
--Kurtcool2 (talk) 12:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. It is that.
  1. Potatoe.
  2. Space potatoe.
    1. Greenlobe
    2. Bluerash
  3. Subspace potatoe
Queen Spiral (talk) 12:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another test

Notables

Notable 1
Notable 2
Notable 3
  1. 1Notable 1
    1. 2Notable 2
      1. 3Notable 3
      • Notable 3
  • Notable 1
    • Notable 2

I don't get the numbers, I'll be back ZVNC (talk) 02:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Notable 1
  2. Notable 2
    1. Notable. 2.5
      1. Notable 2.25
  3. Notable 3

Now I get it! ZVNC (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank God you now get it,I am still trying to.
I have list of things I would like to do
  1. Read as much as i can
  2. Take time to understand
    1. What I have read
    2. Assimilate it
  3. Digest it, then regurgitate it.

Ochawhite (talk) 12:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TEST! TEST! IGLOO TEST!Guardian entei (talk) 12:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is my test
--Arvid Carlander (talk) 23:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More Tests

Yep, More

  1. Uno
  2. Dos
  3. Tres

AlexDuarte (talk) 08:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sargentprivate (talk) 12:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I confused 4 of this: ~ with 4 of this: * -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guardian entei (talkcontribs) 12:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC) hmm this is kinda tricky 04:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.1.73 (talk) [reply]

What do you mean, Header?

And a Sub-Header?

What kind of text editing system is this?

(A decent one)
  1. This
    1. Sign
  2. Has a strange name
  • Give the bullets a chance!
    • I completely agree

Bullets get no chance.

They should!
Definitely not
Should.

--SixtySuit (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could? RobertLClegg (talk) 00:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amazio (talk)LOL!

                                                        1. tHIS
  1. Is
      1. A
  2. Thing
                            • That
  • is
    1. FUNNY!

''''BOLD!?'''' fu+Q —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amazio (talkcontribs) 23:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's quite difficult to remember editing rules

  • first time
  • second time
  • third time

PaintAurora (talk) 10:14, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another test.

Does anyone else have problems remembering all the proper codes?

One colon for one indentation;
Two for two;
And so on.

Now for bullet points.

  • One asterisk for one bullet point.
    • Two for two;
      • Etc.

And finally, numbering:

  1. One number sign for one number;
    1. Two for two;
      1. more for more!--Ekias (talk) 22:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First comment Sargentprivate (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Second commentSargentprivate (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Reply with unordered list:


Something new Sargentprivate (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply with ol: Sargentprivate (talk)
  1. First
  2. Second
    1. About the second
    2. Also about the second
  3. Third


People are making no sense here... lol NinjaTweak (talk) 17:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it made sense, it would be an actual Wiki page now wouldn't it ; ) HA! NinjaBack!! RobertLClegg (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
These can be found in a first aid box
  • Scissors
  • Spirit
  • cotton wool

Ochawhite (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Yes no one makes sense here so lets blab! User:Ebdullah khan

The following are my favorite bikes. Here is a self explanatory chart of the fastes on a quartermile

00:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

-Lordy what a roundaboutway to comment/edit...Yym0z (talk)