Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Appearance
Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. |
---|
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important!
|
This page was last updated at 21:29 on 3 December 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Alerts
- 92.245.5.133 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:24, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- 193.35.132.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - anon account seemingly only used for vandalism and likely a sock, of who I don't care. -- Banjeboi 11:30, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. — Tivedshambo (t/c) 11:42, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- That's not a content dispute. Please have a look at that user's many vandalism contributions and talkpage.
- Looking at the range of good and bad edits, I suspect this is a shared IP. Therefore, I'll only consider today's edit, which is not blatnat vandalism. — Tivedshambo (t/c) 12:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- They have targeted me before but we can let it go as they only seem to do a few edits every few days. It can be someone else's problem. Thanks for looking into it. -- Banjeboi 12:09, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Looking at the range of good and bad edits, I suspect this is a shared IP. Therefore, I'll only consider today's edit, which is not blatnat vandalism. — Tivedshambo (t/c) 12:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- That's not a content dispute. Please have a look at that user's many vandalism contributions and talkpage.
- 193.35.132.148 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) sock of 193.35.132.149 from un-archived report above and likely tied to one of the antagonists who have targeted me or the article, I don't care which. Despite several requests in multiple venues no COI issues have been presented warranting the disruptive use of this tag, likely as there are none. Seriously, this is either a sock or a meat puppet. Perhaps a short semi on the article compelling editors to utilize registered accounts would be helpful? -- Banjeboi 14:30, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Semi-protected per request. Daniel Case (talk) 14:50, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Gebio (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - sockpuppet of banned User:Koov (same edit pattern as recent socks like User:Roilv). Biruitorul Talk 14:47, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. -- Mentifisto 14:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- 66.244.123.108 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Has continued vandalizing despite final warning Hmrox (talk) 14:56, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the categories: IP addresses used for vandalism, Shared IP addresses from educational institutions. HBC AIV helperbot2 (talk) 14:56, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- 69.145.80.50 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - On Apache (diff); vandalism after recent release of block Ertemplin (talk) 14:57, 6 October 2009 (UTC)