Jump to content

User talk:Enochlau

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 82.6.118.145 (talk) at 15:50, 18 December 2005 (Why did you delete my biography?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hi! I welcome comments, suggestions and complaints. Please use the + sign at the top of the page to add a new section. I will usually reply on your user talk page, unless you indicate otherwise. However, I will never reply via email, unless I know you personally.

Archived discussion:

This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify)


You're a sysop!

Hi, Enochlau, Congratulations on Becoming a Sysop

Hey there. I'm pleased to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator! You've volunteered to do housekeeping duties that normal users sadly cannot participate in. Sysops can't do a lot of stuff: They can't delete pages just like that (except patent nonsense like "aojt9085yu8;3ou"), and they can't protect pages in an edit war they are involved in. But they can delete random junk, ban anonymous vandals, delete pages listed on Votes for deletion (provided there's a consensus) for more than one week, protect pages when asked to, and keep the few protected pages that exist on Wikipedia up to date.

Almost anything you can do can be undone, but please take a look at The Administrators' how-to guide and the Administrators' reading list before you get started (although you should have read that during your candidacy ;). Take a look before experimenting with your powers. Also, please add Administrators' noticeboard to your watchlist, as there are always discussions/requests for admins there. If you have any questions drop me a message at My talk page. Have fun! =Nichalp «Talk»=

Please also add your name to WP:LA. =Nichalp «Talk»= 04:12, 2 December 2005 (UTC) [reply]

Woohoo! Enochlau 12:00, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations Enochlau! Enjoy your new wiki powers, which you've well earned.--cj | talk 11:43, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulatulations (drunk and at work) from the land of ice and snow. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 11:45, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats from me too. If the request had been more publicised, I probably would have voted. I guess I should pay more attention to these things! JPD (talk) 19:03, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO, I think you're reading CSD A3 too narrowly. By the standards you give, I could create an article whose sole contents are "Here is a picture of my cat," followed by a link, and you would not consider that speediable under A3. If A3 doesn't apply here, A1 surely must. The article tells us nothing about the radio station, what its listenership is like, what if any significance it has. If you disagree, please feel free to remove the speedy tag and send it to AfD instead. Regards, howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 23:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

KNTC

The reason why I tagged it for speedy delete was that I assumed it was a copyvio, since the contributor's other articles were aslo copyvios. I haven't found an exact match for this, but this link comes close. Sorry for the inconvenience, but the article as it stands doesn't come out good at all. I was going to tag it for cleanup, but as I originally entered this, it was deleted anyway. ErikNY 02:23, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Really?

Did you really spend your night sending RFA thanks? =) Now that's some addiction... jnothman talk 12:42, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not a question of tradition- with that a familiar - just a question of Saturday night pasttime. Then again, I'm here too- my plans fell apart. jnothman talk 13:31, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
(Replied on user page. Enochlau 02:05, 4 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Afraid of banstick...

Hello, i have recently been adding some lore for the online game Dark and Light. This lore draws on established mythology, but the Agnar(DnL) page has been deleted, even though i am quite sure that i cited my sources, and i was not even contacted about the deletion... it was just removed... i would go and recreate the page, and be sure that i cited my sources (as can be found on Gothar) but i am a little afraid of the banstick... Fosnez 01:51, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 02:05, 4 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Looking back at the history of this article --Frederick Noel Dotson III - in the initial comments, the author indicated it was about his/her father -- "(This article is solely about my father.)" The article says "presiding", not "president" - I think the author meant "residing". There is a town called Oracle in Arizona. As far I could find, there is no Dotson associated with Oracle -- thus the nomination for speedy delete. At this point, an anon IP has blanked the article. ERcheck 03:11, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 07:50, 4 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

List of heroes

Why you deleted List of non-fictional heroes? 213.114.215.199 10:44, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of non-fictional heroes. Enochlau 13:12, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

delete List of villains to. otherwise its not fair. 213.114.215.199 14:57, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 15:00, 4 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

It's probably too late — I missed the AfD — but I would have voted to move the page to List of historical people portrayed as heroes, with restrictions similar to those at List of historical people portrayed as villains. It doesn't seem to me that there was a strong consensus on the AfD page, but I defer to your judgement. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 20:25, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please, it would be wonderful if you could provide me with the former content of List of non-fictional heroes. I won't be able to work on the proposed List of historical people portrayed as heroes for some time, but when I do have time it would be great to have this as a resource. Thank you! —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 22:47, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
(Replied on user page. Enochlau 22:54, 5 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]
Thanks, Enochlau. At a glance, it seems that it will require more work to massage into the NPOV perspective than I had hoped, but I will work on it in time. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 22:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder; when you re-create an article with {{deletedpage}} you should protect it (as I've just done for List of non-fictional heroes. Articles that aren't being created frequently enough to need protection don't need to have the template either. —Cryptic (talk) 16:44, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and the talk pages of deleted articles should almost always be speedied (per WP:CSD#G8), not get a "This article was discussed at AFD" banner like kept articles do. —Cryptic (talk) 16:47, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
(Replied on user page. Enochlau 21:58, 9 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Skin Cell/Human Skin Model

Hello, I need to make a model of a skin cell/human skin, but I'm having problems as to how to go about doing that. I was searching for information about human skin and I rememered Wikipedia is usually a great source to refer to so I decided to take a visit. Sure enough, I came across the page that tells all about human skin. I also noticed the image of your human skin model. Is there anything you can do or say to help me with my model (which I haven't started yet)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Need2KnowBasis (talkcontribs) 05:52, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 22:20, 4 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for deleting those images. May I ask a favor? Can you please "rename" some of the images that appear on this page? The ones under Season 1 section. I was trying to get them all to follow the Oh My Goddess 1x??.png pattern. --Cool CatTalk|@ 02:07, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think images can be renamed. You might just have to upload them and get the old ones speedily deleted :( Cheers. Enochlau 02:10, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I know that thats why it was in quotes :P --Cool CatTalk|@ 10:06, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dominic Preston

Hi, I put a nn-bio tag on Dominic Preston, which you deleted earlier today. However, I see its talk page still exists. Is this normally the case? (I dealt with the 'what links here' articles.) --BillC 18:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Redshift

Responded! HorsePunchKid 2005-12-06 00:51:08Z

Another response. I forgot to say this, but feel free to revert that last edit of mine to Redshift; I don't feel too strongly about it one way or the other. :) HorsePunchKid 2005-12-06 01:02:07Z

Hi, I noticed you removed the {{nn-bio}} tag from him. I've been under the impression that a person isn't considered famous here because of their parentage, and they only warrant a mention on the parents' pages. The kid is only around 7 years old so I don't think he can be notable yet on his own merits. (I googled him up before tagging that). I missed Zahara Jolie-Pitt though (created by the same user), and she's 9 months old.

However, since we're having a (one-sided) discussion, I'm not really sure what should be done to them (afd?), since someone's bound to keep recreating the articles. Normally you could redirect, but sadly both of the parents are famous so you couldn't really just choose one :( - Bobet 01:41, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I agree it's probably better just to leave the article there (although it would be more suited for a tabloid than an encyclopedia, someone's bound to search for that at some point). I'll just clean it up a bit and find a reference link. Sorry for being so hasty on putting the tag up, I didn't really think it through at first. - Bobet 02:26, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I looked, and found that he isn't a jolie-pitt yet, so I'm just confused now. Maybe I should start reading tabloids or something. I moved Zahara Jolie-Pitt to Zahara Jolie, but there already was a page about Maddox (which redirects to angelina jolie), so you'll have to move it. And now I feel like I'd actually get pissed if these articles get deleted, after all that hard work. - Bobet 02:39, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hi Enochlau!
Thank you so much for the barnstar, it is very gratifying to be honored with another barnstar. I'll try my best to by worthy and keep improving my contribs! --Fir0002 05:44, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :) Enochlau 07:51, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Orange Party Deletion

Thank you for closing the Orange Party deletion and taking care of it, however, you missed the "Also Delete" comment for the identical article The Orange Party (note the "The"). Thanks. -^demon 13:42, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oops :) Enochlau 14:24, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

try looking deeper into the problem

before making a command decision. User 71.109.146.107 is clearly under the influence of cannabis and Wikipedia MUST address the question of whether its editors are editing under the influence of psychoactive substances. -Naif 14:33, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Riiiight. The joke stops here. Enochlau 14:43, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Have you even bothered examining his/her edits? This isn't a joke. - Naif 14:45, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, his contribs are actually coherent sentences though. Will block. Thanks for the head up. Enochlau 14:50, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ever onward, wikipedia. - Naif 14:54, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete

HI, please delete Rohit shah. This is a fairly common personal name in India, such as say "John Smith"; you will agree that no such page should exist, and also that it is absurd to redirect "John Smith" to the "Smith" page, which describes what blacksmiths do for a living.

ImpuMozhi 19:31, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I nabbed it for copyvio instead. Enochlau 22:39, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for dropping me a line. You're right, I mistagged that one. Well, one out firty-two isn't that bad. ;) I have now corrected it to point to the correct filename, Image:Firion GBA menu.png. Cheers. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 23:37, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 23:42, 7 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Could I ask what speedy deletion criteria you felt applied to this article? Christopher Parham (talk) 00:16, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 00:51, 8 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]
In this case, the original deletion was also a speedy deletion, so repost alone isn't a valid reason. See WP:CSD#G4, the bullet point. Christopher Parham (talk) 00:54, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
(Replied on user page. Enochlau 01:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]
Hey, don't worry, it worked. You just need to revert the protection-against-recreation template back to the old content (and reopen the AFD). Christopher Parham (talk) 01:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
(Replied on user page. Enochlau 01:16, 8 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Under the AMACOE history, it shows "one deleted edit". A previous admin deleted it for being a not-needed article. Then it was re-added five minutes later. I watched it while it was happening. <->Refusetobesilenced 01:23, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 01:28, 8 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Info on speedy del

Thank you for taking the time to give info on this subject. Lincher 01:26, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What ever happened to Oshki?

Sorry, I don't catch this: 15 minutes after I had published an image of the cathedral of Oshki [image:Oshki.JPG], somebody called Walter Görlitz visits the page and re-edits (?!) it. I have no idea what this person did to the image, but three minutes later it was entirely deleted by you. Could you please explain to me what happened? Sofie

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 10:58, 8 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Deletion review#Southern Ivies. I think you made an error in deleting this page. DES (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on page. Enochlau 22:36, 8 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

My RfA

Enoch, thanks for your support on my RfA. The final count was 46/0/0. I hope I'll live up to your faith in me in my use of the mop and bucket. Please accept this wikithanks as a token of my gratitude ;) --bainer (talk) 01:11, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 02:03, 9 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Kung hei fat choi

Please kindly share with us at a move request discussion your observation from among the people in Sydney and in other places in New South Wales and Australia on the usage of this phrase. Thanks. — Instantnood 17:42, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 23:12, 11 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

about your attitude

love the way you judge/delete peoples website/forum link... nonsense huh..use a little diplomacy next time. ....not the way to make friends matey. regards. Admin-FBD AUS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.228.198.52 (talkcontribs) 10:23, December 12, 2005 (UTC)

Yadi yadi ya. If you have a problem with the deletion, go to Wikipedia:Deletion review. Enochlau 22:03, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted page: Majesty_(band)/Temp

Hi Enochlau. You recently deleted a page I created, Majesty_(band)/Temp. It was created as part of the copyvio process (see Majesty_(band)). Was your deletion a mistake or was there a reason it was deleted? As I understand it, the temporary page for a copyvio is supposed to remain in place so that people can construct a new article... I made a (very) brief stub. Could you fill me in? ~MDD4696 (talkcontribs) 05:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 05:38, 13 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Enochlau, Moriori accused me of making libellous statements about Tariana Turia, which was potentially a racial attack on me. I have met the nasty woman, so therefore, my criticism of her is more than warranted. - (Aidan Work 06:09, 13 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 07:43, 13 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Spelling

I hope I don't sound too pedantic :) but I've thought "obsolited" has always looked a bit funny. I've checked it up, and it's "obsoleted" with an 'e' [1]. Cheers. Enochlau 01:42, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Awwwww... OK. :P --Cool CatTalk|@ 14:05, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Article delete: Wang Sichao

Don't you think before delete articles, you should notify the one who wrote it first? Don't you think you should delete an article without any discussions? Well, that article is a stub and very low-quality, but you should not make a speedy deletion without notify the writer or make any discussions. Someone added Template:nn-bio tags on it, but the one added the tag who even has no his/her own user page! So you would better undelete that article and if possible and never make speedy deletion like that. Thanks. — Yaohua2000 21:37, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The answer is "no" to your two questions. (Replied on user page. Enochlau 22:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]
Trust me, this guy is absolutely notable according to Wikipedia's policy, but my English is not good enough to write all them out, so if anyone here can help me, that would be fine. Anyway, thank you for the undelete. — Yaohua2000 22:42, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you just speedied this article as a "nn-bio" despite claims of significance made in the body of the article. On checking I see that James Cameron wrote the foreword for his book Ghosts of the Titanic. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 16:35, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 22:30, 14 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

What's wrong with "Fashion of Thinking"?

Hi Enochlau! A while ago you deleted my article "Fashion of Thinking". Well, you will have had your reason to do so. Would you tell me, why? - I think, I could learn a lesson from it. All the more since my second article "Productivity of Wikipedia Authors" is still here! - So, what's the significant difference between these two? -- GJG 18:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on user page. Enochlau 22:32, 14 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Enochlau. I was wondering if you would take another look at the Geisha picture that was nominated for Featured Image status; two edits of the image were uploaded and some comments were left that may address your reasons for opposing. The photographer uploaded a crop of the original that I think really improves the photo and reduces the client's prominence in the image. ~MDD4696 (talkcontribs) 02:44, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I will consider it. Enochlau 02:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my biography?

Hi there. Please let me know why you deleted my biography on Dec 10th. Thanks. Andrew Crookall. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.118.145 (talkcontribs)

(Removed email address) Read WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO. It was speedily deleted for being a biography that did not meet notability requirements. If you are certain that you meet the notability criteria as set out on the two preceding links, you are welcome to rewrite the article, ensuring that the content of the article addresses those notability criteria. I should point out that it is a serious faux pas to write about yourself. It is called vanity. Furthermore, Wikipedia is not a place to advertise your services. Do not write your email address on any article pages, and I suggest that you do not do so on any talk pages (in particular, not on mine; I will not reply via email). Enochlau 13:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea that such pompous, arrogant people were actually given editorial rights. Thank you for letting me know that Wikipedia is something with which I do not want to be connected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.118.145 (talkcontribs)

And I had no idea that there were so many people with inflated opinions of themselves who want to write about themselves. My previous response above was quite neutral and presented the facts as they are. If you cannot accept them, that is not my problem. Enochlau 14:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have an inflated opinion of myself. The article I wrote was entirely factual. I have requested that all information and all contributions I have made to any site connected with Wikipedia be removed. I hope that will be done as soon as possible. I do not wish to be connected with such small minded thinking. Andrew Crookall.