User talk:SpK

This is SpK's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1: 14 days

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SMSCrest.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:SMSCrest.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signature Help

{{helpme}} Why won't the 'K' in my signature link to my talk page? You can see the code here. Thanks :) --~Sp K 18:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link is working correctly. When you use your signature on your own talk page, it won't link to here because Wikipedia won't create an internal link to the page on the same page. If you use your signature on another page, an article talk page for example, then it will show up normally. Please let me know if there are any more questions. Thanks! --Mysdaao ^talk 18:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bully!

Why are you picking on me? Leave me alone! 92.15.41.187 (talk) 22:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of Camfrog Article

Hi SpK,

The edit I made to the Camfrog article was not vandalism, there was an extra set of notices underneath the article's introduction (clones of the notices already currently at the top of the page) and and extra infobox that was stretched out like this -

| name = Camfrog Video Chat

| url = http://www.camfrog.com

| type = online chat

That obviously did not display correctly.

The previous state of the article can be viewed here -

http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Camfrog&diff=prev&oldid=289764268

Thanks,

78.147.102.74 (talk) 04:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ShArOlAiD

Gurl! Why you be deleting Sharolaid's contribution to Fort Lauderdale? She is the Queen of YouTube and the founder of BHH. You let Jeffree Star have her own page, and she owes most of her catchphrases to Sharolaid. Don't be hating on a sister, yo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.9.95.251 (talk)

First of all, I'm not a girl. Second of all, I deleted your vandalism to the article, not your contribution. Quite frankly, you are just a vandal, and I don't need to spend any more time dealing with you. ~Sp K 13:01, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, gurl! You make me feel like I've just been to church!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.9.95.251 (talk)

tsk tsk

I'm disappointed. The last few times I have vandalized those watching the edits (on RC patrol I guess) blocked first and warned later. This time I had to compel two different editors to issue a total of four warnings before the block warning message came up. It should have been obvious to both of you that the account was being used in vandal-based editing exclusively. Next time block sooner :) 75.26.17.42 (talk) 03:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um, not really sure what this was about, but thanks SpK. Cheers, —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 04:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; and very few people have any clue what vandals mean half the time :) ~Sp K 15:03, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photo help

I took a photo and put it up on Wiki Commons to put on this article here. It said I had no licence, but surely if I took the work I know that I am not infringing my own copyright? Please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.246.55 (talk) 22:14, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In order to upload an image, you have to license it. What license you choose is up to you. I'd recommend just releasing it into the public domain to avoid any future conflicts. ~Sp K 22:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Be Careful About Vandalism Warnings, You're Mistaken

I explained in both re-edits that they're not vandalism (Isengard (Norwegian band) and Talk:Isengard (Norwegian band)). You should reconsider your "warnings". (And I tried moving first but the previous page had to be deleted, hence it couldn't be moved, that's why I moved the content instead.) Dimitrakopulos (talk) 20:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First, please do not be agressive, it isn't necessary. Secondly, there are reasons why things cannot be moved sometimes, and if pages have to be deleted and moved, there is protocol to doing these things (i.e. discussions about moves etc.). Please don't just move pages because you feel they need to be moved. ~Sp K 20:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

None of that was "aggressive". Hopefully you don't receive quotations as aggression. Now I'm aware of the protocols. Thanks.Dimitrakopulos (talk) 20:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As per Wikipedia policy, I will be reverting their pages to their original location, and performing a proper page move on your behalf.

~Sp K 20:58, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, cheers. Dimitrakopulos (talk) 21:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]