Jump to content

The Rhetoric of Drugs

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SmackBot (talk | contribs) at 15:10, 17 October 2009 (Correct standard headers and general fixes). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Rhetoric of Drugs, Rhétorique de la drogue in the original French title, is a 1989 work by French philosopher Jaques Derrida. Derrida, interviewed, discusses the concept of "drug", and says that "Already one must conclude that the concept of drug is a non-scientific concept, that it is instituted on the basis of moral or political evaluations."[1] In his philosophical-linguistic analysis, Derrida unmasks the socio-cultural mystifications made on the discourses on drugs.

Derrida also discusses the problem of drug use by athletes. Exploring its confines, he says: "and what about women athletes who get pregnant for the stimulating, hormonal effects and then have an abortion after their event?"[2]

Derrida discusses how the link between the rhetoric of drugs and the Western ideology. He also says that "Adorno and Horkheimer correctly point out that drug culture has always been associated with the West's other, with Oriental ethics and religion",[3][4] and adds: "The Enlightenment [...] is in itself a declaration of war on drugs."[3]

Editions

This interview was made in 1989 and published more than one time as a journal article. It was included in the Derrida's 1992 book Points de suspension. Entretiens, as section XIV. The English edition of Points de suspension. Entretiens, titled Points: Interviews 1974-1994 (1995), contained the interview at pp. 228-254, as the final part of the chapter Autobiophotographies.

Reactions

Neurobiologist and anti-drug activist Rita Levi Montalcini, which a few months earlier[clarification needed] was the protagonist of an anti-drug TV ad campaign, was bothered by Derrida's work and commented: "Those [substances] that we call drugs are substances that are well identified both on the pharmacological-botanical level and on the behavioural level".[5]

Notes

  1. ^ Eng. 1995, p.229
  2. ^ Eng. 1995, p.248 original: "Et la pratique des athlètes femmes qui provoquent une grossesse dont les effets endocriniens sont «dopants» et qui avortent après l’épreuve?"
  3. ^ a b Eng. 1995, p.250
  4. ^ Adorno and Horkheimer, 1944
  5. ^ Corriere della Sera, March 1993:

See also

References

  • English edition, 1995
  • Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer [1944] Dialectic of Enlightenment (French translation by E. Kaufholz, Gallimard, 1974, p. 75-76)
  • Ma la droga non e' solo una parola, article published by Corriere della Sera, March 1993. Quotes from Montalcini:

    "the quibbles of a philosopher!" accuses Rita Levi Montalcini, which was the protagonist, with Di Pietro and Archbishop Martini, of last anti-drug publicity campaign. [...] Rita Levi Montalcini turns up her nose, bothered: "it seems to me that this gentleman ( 'questo signore', an Italian mildly derogative expression ) amuses himself quibbling, in order to appear original. Those that we call drugs ( "stupefacenti", an Italian word that sounds somewhat more 'official' ) are substances that are well identified both on the pharmacological-botanical level and on the behavioural level. You can mythologize them as much as you want, but it has been proven, that they are not at all, means to reach an higher knowledge. On the contrary, they decrease cognitive ability and increase emotional responses. Neither Newton nor Einstein made their discoveries under the action of any drug".

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=The_Rhetoric_of_Drugs&oldid=320411147"