User talk:SWAdair
This is SWAdair's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
20,000 Leagues Under the Sea is an American silent film directed by Stuart Paton and released on December 24, 1916. Based primarily on the 1870 novel Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas by Jules Verne, the film also incorporates elements from Verne's 1875 novel The Mysterious Island. This was the first motion picture filmed underwater. Actual underwater cameras were not used, but a system of watertight tubes and mirrors allowed the camera to shoot reflected images of underwater scenes staged in shallow sunlit waters in the Bahamas. For the scene featuring a battle with an octopus, cinematographer John Ernest Williamson devised a viewing chamber called the "photosphere", a 6-by-10-foot (1.8-by-3.0-metre) steel globe in which a cameraman could be placed. The film was made by the Universal Film Manufacturing Company (now Universal Pictures), not then known as a major motion picture studio, and took two years to make, at the cost of $500,000.Film credit: Stuart Paton
|
Archives |
---|
Seasons Greetings
<font=3> Wishing you a "Feliz Navidad and a Happy new Year" Tony the Marine (talk) |
---|
Carbola Chemical
I noticed you have some posts about the Carbola mine. I'm doing some research on its ownership and liability interests (I know it passed hands, etc.). What information can you give me? Any pictures?
I would appreciate anything you can tell me. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvergirl111 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hello. I don't know much about the Carbola mine or company. Three years ago someone created an article here that wasn't really an article. It was a request for information about the Carbola Chemical Company. Since an information request doesn't qualify as an article, I moved the request to the Reference desk before deleting the (non)article. If you've seen my name in relation to edits about Carbola Chemical, then most likely you've already seen that page. If not, then check that link. User:Rholton came up with some contact information from 1998 which you may be able to use to track ownership. SWAdair | Talk 00:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
RE:My talk page
Thanks for replying to Gemini! Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 15:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
Happy Birthday | from the Birthday Committee | |
---|---|---|
Wishing SWAdair a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!--~~~~ |
Idontknow610TM 00:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you, everyone, for the birthday wishes. They made me smile. SWAdair | Talk 15:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Happy Birthday, User:SWAdair. I hope that your birthday is a good one. Ericthebrainiac (talk) 22:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I wanted to know if you (or any friends of yours) are interested in dermatology, and would be willing to help me with the WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force? kilbad (talk) 18:48, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Feliz Navidad
<font=3> Wishing you a "Feliz Navidad and a Happy new Year" Tony the Marine (talk) |
---|
Man I've missed inter-acting with you here. How you been? I'm sorry for the late greeting, but my wife is hospitalized and that is where I spent my Christmas. Take care, Tony the Marine (talk) 05:45, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Profanity in Can opener
Shortly, I reverted you because I am more comfortable with f**cking than fucking :-) We all know what it means, thus why spelling out. Regarding WP rules on profanity, they say citations should be followed by the source. There are two refs on that phrase. One use the former another the latter spelling, which makes things somewhat obscure, but. The former ref is much more detailed (not on phrasing, but on food rationing :-) and IMO has more chances for long-term survival with f**cking than fucking. Regards. PS I am not reverting you now awaiting either your reply, or self-revert. Materialscientist (talk) 08:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, editing in parallel, right now I am searching info for a very very interesting (but "hard to get") DYK, thats why minutes of delay. My only f**king concern in those reverts was that my intuition tells me Can openers would survive longer with ** in it ;-) Either spelling is Ok. Happy editing. Materialscientist (talk) 08:56, 23 August 2009 (UTC)