Jump to content

Talk:Thin-film solar cell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ICE77 (talk | contribs) at 01:12, 26 October 2009 (This article needs to be reorganized: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconEnergy Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Articles

There is a number of articles that are discussing thin film solar cells technologies separately. Thin Film Solar Cells IS regarded as ONE category of solar cells so I suppose that all relevant solar cell types should be put under the same article. What should be kept in separate articles is the various thin film materials where their properties, deposition processes, etc. can be mentioned. I am in the middle of a big group project about thin film photovoltaics and will be updating this article with references and material frequently. Please join me and lets give TFSC the decent article that they deserve.--Elmerfadd (talk) 05:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

References are included and the external links are OK. I am going to delete the note in the article.--Nopetro (talk) 12:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be reorganized

The first part of this article should be under a section called "Types".

The "Time Award" section is ridiculus at the top. It is also just about useless. If it really has to be in this article, it should be placed at the end.

The word "efficiency" appears in the titles for sections 2, 3.3 and 5. I would be intelligent to merge everything into a single section called "efficiency".

ICE77 (talk) 01:12, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]