Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ViperNerd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Renamed user VYTYPCKEXW (talk | contribs) at 23:28, 27 October 2009 (Report date October 27 2009, 12:28 (UTC): Archived). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

ViperNerd

ViperNerd (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ViperNerd/Archive.

Report date October 27 2009, 12:28 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by CobraGeek The Geek

This is an obvious return of indefinitely blocked User:ViperNerd. Two edits following, one just made by the listed IP, the other by an already blocked IP sock of ViperNerd:
[1]
[2] (by User:129.252.69.40).

WP:Duck should be adequate. I have reported this IP as a potential open proxy. CobraGeek The Geek 12:28, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

just because someone makes an edit you don't like that happens to agree with a blocked user, doesn't automatically mean that they are a sock. i've checked the reporting user's history, and this ongoing crusade is pretty sad stuff. i hope everyone who views this report realizes that this user has done nothing but build a shrine[3] to a disruptive user. my advice to the wikipedia tattletale? grow up and do something constructive with your time here. 61.186.94.146 (talk) 17:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It will shortly be archived automatically.

{{SPIclose}} is deprecated. Please change the parameter in the {{SPI case status}} to "close" instead.