User talk:Cwiker

Please log in to your Cwiker account and make the request from there. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:03, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cwiker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand how someone forgetting their password and creating a second account is grounds for blocking? I understand if I had logged into Cwiker and then into the other account, that would be a clear indication of using multiple accounts. However, that NEVER happened. I have not logged into the other account since I created Cwiker because I forgot the password to it. I know the password to Cwiker and only intended to use it from here on out. So what is the problem here? Please remove my block so I may use my account. If I am being blocked for some other reason, please tell me what that is?

Decline reason:

That you used this account and the other ones to spam. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:48, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cwiker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That is false. I never advertised a single Web URL or phone number using this account. Regarding the other account (Micky90), I only listed what I believed to be a valid URL, and when it was removed, I never added it back (realizing it was incorrect). It was an honest mistake. Confirm my statements and please remove this block.

Decline reason:

Stop evading your block. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 04:11, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Then explain this Talk:Wolfram_Alpha#wfalpha.com_.26_wolfa.com. Why were you advocating on behalf of an illegal mirror site? Triplestop x3 00:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was not advocating any web url at Talk:Wolfram_Alpha#wfalpha.com_.26_wolfa.com. In fact, I never even typed either of those web urls in my responses. I made it a point not to talk about them anymore after I saw the url was incorrect roughly two weeks ago.

Pleasantville sent me a nasty and completley unnecessary message, so it was my pleasure to correct her poorly investigated statements. I don't see how this is grounds for me being blocked though, since I did not do it in a rude manner? I stated facts, nothing else. Cwiker (talk)

And if I was a spammer, I would have just used a different IP and created a new account by now and not cared about this account. The fact that I want my account reenabled shows that I am not a spammer (that would be illogical). Can someone stop accusing me of this crap and unblock me?

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Cwiker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please see me response directly about this. it is obvious i'm not a spammer

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=please see me response directly about this. it is obvious i'm not a spammer |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=please see me response directly about this. it is obvious i'm not a spammer |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=please see me response directly about this. it is obvious i'm not a spammer |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}