Jump to content

User talk:DanFord2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Murrarie (talk | contribs) at 22:19, 6 November 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello DanFord2, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

DanFord2, good luck, and have fun. --Vatsan34 (talk) 05:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please desist from adding opinionated commentary to Witchfinder General (Band). Any factual information must be sourced and cited. Sources must be from established websites rather than discussion forums or Youtube comments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Murrarie (talk • contribs) 05:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I for one do not find your commentary opinionated, it is factual and true. You could not find a more established site than www.youtube.com. There are no trustworthy 'established sites' from which one can get this type of information. The type of editing Murrarie is involved in appears very specific and calculated. I know Phil Cope and Zeeb Parkes very well and while they no long seem to get on I do not think they would disagree with your content. But please, please, please note his name is Phil Cope not ‘Phillip’ Cope, I don't think he likes the name Phillip. dancewithme. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.45.13 (talk) 11:32, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles must contain verifiable information only. Opinionated matter, whether positive or negative, does not belong. If you know the band members, that also involves a conflict of interest issue and you should not be editing the article. My edits are specific and calculated only to the extent that I would like the article to conform to Wikipedia standards. I have no hidden agenda. And I am not responsible for "Phillip", must have been another editor. Murrarie (talk) 22:19, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing advice

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. PhilKnight (talk) 00:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC) There is no way to reference any facts as all information on the band is quite subjective but there is the truth which some, it appears, do not want known. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.45.13 (talk) 08:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC) I have read your edits and see that you are in an edit war with other users that are not giving good reason why they are undoing you contributions. I will be watch these pages and be only too happy to assist you if needs be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dancewithme2 (talk • contribs) 09:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

7 day block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 12:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence for block

In addition to edit warring to restore original research, there has been sock puppetry:

PhilKnight (talk) 12:28, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note to other admins

Feel free to modify this block without contacting me. PhilKnight (talk) 12:28, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DanFord2&oldid=324357379"