User talk:Jk54

Welcome!

Hello, Jk54, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Be Bold

Assume Good faith

Keep cool

Share your knowledge

Get adopted

Neutral point of view

And here are several pages on what to avoid:

How to avoid Copyright infringement

How not to spam

Make sure not to get blocked, which should be no problem after reading this

The Three-Revert-Rule and how to avoid breaking it

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Also, I think that you might be interested in the adopt-a-user project, where advanced editors can guide you in your editing; so check it out if you want. Again, welcome! Gman124^talk 23:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Your recent edits

Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Quilliam Foundation. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Work permit (talk) 04:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: comments

Actually, I can't think of a case where citing academic sources would be a copyright issue, but then again I could be wrong. I would encourage you to skip blogs and forums at all costs per WP:RS and WP:V. If you're still not sure, seek help from others on whichever article it was on the talk page. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:07, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues from a blog? Are you sure? MezzoMezzo (talk) 16:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Contribution

I noticed that you have great exposure of islam and its role in modern politics. I was wondering if you like to contribute Fethullah Gülen, since the article is far from perfect and mostly biased. I'm inviting other people to contribute, so the article's tone gets more neutral. (AA 01:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC))

Any chance you could help with Niedermayer-Hentig Expedition?

Hello JK54, I was wondering if you might be able to help with Niedermayer-Hentig Expedition which is to do with German espionage in World War I. I wanted to see if there was any help especially with prose and c/e, but would also appreciate any other comments, since I wanted to put it up for FAC once PR is done. [[::User: rueben_lys| rueben_lys]] ([[::User talk: rueben_lys|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/ rueben_lys|contribs]]) 14:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Gulen

other pages? be careful? is threatening another cheap tactic of you to push your pov? Philscirel (talk) 03:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to review my second nomination of philscirel. If you feel I have unfairly reported 71.72.81.230 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), please say so. --Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 05:56, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines

Helo Jk54. Please do not edit others' comments or remove material posted by others on article Talk pages, as you did at Talk:Quilliam Foundation. Such behavior can lead to blocks. I tried to fix the page; if anything of yours got omitted when I fixed it, you can restore it now. EdJohnston (talk) 14:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and a request

Thanks for signing up at Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers and for your work doing reviews. It is now just over a year since the last peer review was archived with no repsonse after 14 (or more) days, something we all can be proud of. There is a new Peer review user box to track the backlog (peer reviews at least 4 days old with no substantial response), which can be found here. To include it on your user or talk page, please add {{Wikipedia:Peer review/PRbox}} . Thanks again, and keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Ed Husain has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy : Chat 22:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Umar Israilov

I'd appreciate your input on Umar Israilov, a biography article in peer review. The subject is a Chechen soldier and government critic whose death in European exile is a subject of controversy. — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 17:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About Original Research

Go to WP:WQA discussion Avaya1 (talk) 17:18, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3RR complaint

Hello Jk54. See WP:AN3#User:Jk54 reported by User:Avaya1 (Result: ), which is a complaint about your edits at Quilliam Foundation. You may add your own comment to the 3RR discussion if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 03:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed that you be indefinitely blocked from editing here

Hello Jk54. Please see my update at WP:AN3#User:Avaya1 reported by User:Jk54 (Result: ), where I have proposed that you be indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia. You are welcome to respond there. If action is taken before you have time to see this, add a commment here on your talk page, which I will be watching. Any action that is taken on your case will be offered for review by other administrators.

If you have any idea for how to behave better in editing Quilliam Foundation, now would be a good time to make a proposal. EdJohnston (talk) 18:46, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

at Quilliam Foundation, per WP:AN3#User:Avaya1 reported by User:Jk54 (Result: Jk54 indef) and the other discussions linked from that report. Jk54 is a single-purpose account, devoted entirely to long-term POV-pushing at Quilliam Foundation. EdJohnston (talk) 12:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Jk54 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now fully understand the POV material should not be included in Wiki articles and will ensure I avoid doing so in future.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I now fully understand the POV material should not be included in Wiki articles and will ensure I avoid doing so in future. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I now fully understand the POV material should not be included in Wiki articles and will ensure I avoid doing so in future. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I now fully understand the POV material should not be included in Wiki articles and will ensure I avoid doing so in future. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}