User talk:Jason Rees

Notes

Dear Tropical cyclone editor,

As a member of the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject, you are receiving this message to describe how you can better tropical cyclone articles. There are hundreds of tropical cyclone articles, though many of them are poorly organized and lacking in information. Using the existing featured articles as a guide line, here is the basic format for the ideal tropical cyclone article.

Infobox- Whenever possible, the infobox should have a picture for the tropical cyclone. The picture can be any uploaded picture about the storm, though ideally it should be a satellite shot of the system. If that is not available, damage pictures, either during the storm or after the storm, are suitable. In the area that says Formed, indicate the date on which the storm first developed into a tropical depression. In the area that says Dissipated, indicate the date on which the storm lost its tropical characteristics. This includes when the storm became extratropical, or if it dissipated. If the storm dissipated and reformed, include the original start date and the final end date. Highest winds should be the local unit of measurement for speed (mph in non-metric countries, km/h in metric countries), with the other unit in parenthesis. The lowest pressure should be in mbars. Damages should, when available, be in the year of impact, then the present year. The unit of currency can be at your discretion, though typically it should be in USD. Fatalities indicate direct deaths first, then indirect deaths. Areas affected should only be major areas of impact. Specific islands or cities should only be mentioned if majority of the cyclone's effects occurred there.
Intro- The intro for every article should be, at a minimum, 2 paragraphs. For more impacting hurricanes, it should be 3. The first should describe the storm in general, including a link to the seasonal article, its number in the season, and other statistics. The second should include a brief storm history, while the third should be impact.
Storm history- The storm history should be a decent length, relatively proportional to the longevity of the storm. Generally speaking, the first paragraph should be the origins of the storm, leading to the system reaching tropical storm status. The second should be the storm reaching its peak. The third should be post-peak until landfall and dissipation. This section is very flexable, depending on meteorological conditions, but it should generally be around 3. Storm histories can be longer than three paragraphs, though they should be less than five. Anything more becomes excessive. Remember, all storm impacts, preparations, and records can go elsewhere. Additional pictures are useful here. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its peak, use a landfall picture in the storm history. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its landfall, use the peak. If the landfall is its peak, use a secondary peak, or even a random point in the storm's history.
Preparations- The preparations section can be any length, depending on the amount of preparations taken by people for the storm. Hurricane watches and warnings need to be mentioned here, as well as the number of people evacuated from the coast. Include numbers of shelters, and other info you can find on how people prepared for the storm.
Impact- For landfalling storms, the impact section should be the majority of the article. First, if the storm caused deaths in multiple areas, a death table would work well in the top level impact section. A paragraph of the general effects of the storm is also needed. After the intro paragraph, impact should be broken up by each major area. It depends on the information, but sections should be at least one paragraph, if not more. In the major impact areas, the first paragraph should be devoted to meteorological statistics, including rainfall totals, peak wind gusts on land, storm surge, wave heights, beach erosion, and tornadoes. The second should be actual damage. Possible additional paragraphs could be detailed information on crop damage or specifics. Death and damage tolls should be at the end. Pictures are needed, as well. Ideally, there would be at least one picture for each sub-section in the impact, though this sometimes can't happen. For storms that impact the United States or United States territories, this site can be used for rainfall data, including an image of rainfall totals.
Aftermath- The aftermath section should describe foreign aid, national aid, reconstruction, short-term and long-term environmental effects, and disease. Also, the storm's retirement information, whether it happened or not, should be mentioned here.
Records- This is optional, but can't hurt to be included.
Other- The ideal article should have inline sourcing, with the {{cite web}} formatting being preferable. Always double check your writing and make sure it makes sense.

Good luck with future writing, and if you have a question about the above, don't hesitate to ask.

4F

Nadi Airport 24-hr rainfall data : 24h rs to 9am Thu 8 Jan : 100.1mm. 24 hrs to 9am Fri 9 Jan : 239.3mm 24 hts to 9am Sat 10 Jan : 102.9mm 24 hrs to 9am Sun 11 Jan : 280.8mm To date, 7 confirmed fatalities.

I wish there was a reference to this information (it might be worth checking out sites which contain SYNOP data such as Texas A&M.) Maybe you'll have better luck at the Nadi, Fiji website than I have. I have not been able to download their documents with flood images (the download is phenomenally snow)...I guessing it's the recent event, but since I can't download them, I don't know. FYI. Thegreatdr (talk) 01:18, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For submitting Innis for GA...

		Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar
		Your submission of Innis for GA may help resolve this long-standing issue between members of the project. You wouldn't think it from the comments I've been posting on the various talk pages, but I do agree with you that we don't necessarily need to wait for a TCR before GANing an article. Let's watch how the debate ensues on the TC talk page and see if anything will change. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2007-08 SPAC

Hi Jason,

When I was looking at the article, I saw that it said that RSMC Nadi upgraded TD 12F to TD Gene and then upgraded it to a cat 1 cyclone. when looking at the reference, I couldn't see it in there. Then I checked the history and saw that you added that. How it that possible?

Thanks --Yue ^{of the North} 23:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daman Sources

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9] Note – this is only partially due to Daman
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]

I'll keep adding more when I find them (Reason for links per IRC incase anyone is confused :P) Cyclone biskit 14:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: List of notable Atlantic hurricanes; 2000 Pacific hurricane season; 2002 Pacific hurricane season; Humidex; Storm track; 2000 Pacific typhoon season; Wright Cyclone; 1987 Atlantic hurricane season; Hydrometeorological Prediction Center; 2001 Pacific typhoon season; 1986 Pacific hurricane season; Greater Antilles; Georgia Cyclone; 2004 Pacific hurricane season; The Perfect Storm; 1988 Atlantic hurricane season; Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration; Sipacate; Equivalent potential temperature

Cleanup: 1996 Atlantic hurricane season; Tropical Storm Hilda; Heat index
Merge: Anticyclone; Perfect storm; Samvat (calendars)
Add Sources: Visibility; Wind speed; List of U.S. states' largest cities
Wikify: Lubbock Tornado; Economy of Samoa; Vanessa Anne Hudgens
Expand: Cyclone Ingrid; Typhoon Nina (1987); Thunderstorm

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

WPTC convert template policy

Re: the reversion of my edits to Cyclone Aila. As a Wiki patroller, I regularly improve articles by adding the convert template to show international units and help our readers understand numbers in dimensions and terms familiar to them. Would you please help me learn what's correct by pointing me to the specific page/section that describes the convert template policy on tropical cyclone articles. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 01:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know where its written in fact its probbably one of those unwritten rules :), but we dont use the convert templates as we need to round to the nearest 5 to follow what the RSMCs and TCWCs use in their operational and post storm products. TThe Convert template dosent round to the nearest 5 as far as i am aware. Jason Rees (talk) 01:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. In addition to putting your reply above (just to keep things together), I have asked if this could be added to the template, see Template talk:Convert#Rounding. Truthanado (talk) 02:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tropical Storm Karina (2008)/archive1 as to why this is done. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 20:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing Race Wikipedia

Hello, Jason Rees. Welcome to the Amazing Race Wikipedia. In your travels, you will encounter two types of tasks. In a Detour, you have a choice between two tasks. Both of you must work together on this. In a Roadblock, one team member must work on a task alone. Your Amazing Race Wikipedia submissions page is located here. Enjoy the competition! Best, Shappy (talk · contribs) and Firestorm (talk · contribs). 19:34, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Sorry

Darren23 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Darren 23 (Contribs) 16:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical storm Nangka

hey, why you reverted my editings on Tropical Storm Nangka? If theres something wrong, can u please just fix it,not to revert. I take almost 5 hours to combined all of that article and references. I know you can understand me. Thanks...User talk:Jpuligan_12.27 of June, 09 1822 UTC.

Oy, the vind!

Thank you for helping out with the references on wind. I've spent more time dickering about with the stupid reference format than anything else during the FAC process. There was another comment about them today, which I think I have fixed so that all the refs now have the first name/surname in the same order. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:53, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing Race Wikipedia Starts!

Hello, Shappy. This is a reminder that Amazing Race Wikipedia will start very soon. At 00.00 (or whereabouts), our host Firestorm will place the first Detour on your submissions page. Again, the Detour is a choice between two tasks; both members of the team choose one task and work together to complete it. A Roadblock is a task only one team member must perform; he/she may not have any help from the other team member. Good luck and enjoy the Race! :-) Shappy (talk · contribs) and Firestorm (talk · contribs) --EdwardsBot (talk) 13:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seven unnamed storms...

Hello Jason,

I believe you in saying that there were seven unnamed storms last year, but I'm curious could you perhaps show me where those storms were?

Thanks --An ha mi rak 02:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --An ha mi rak 02:43, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IRC

I've been invited in the past, but don't have any consistent times/days during the week where I could be on regularly because of my rotating shifts. I doubt I could ever get approval to take part in IRC during work hours either. I like the use of the talk pages for various storms to discuss items important to those particular systems, or the project's talk page for items to be addressed as a project. It is what the talk pages are there for. Why re-invent the wheel? Thegreatdr (talk) 01:32, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Jade

Can you grab all the JTWC advisories and Prognostic Reasoning's for Cyclone Jade for me please? All the dates that you need to find the advisories are located here and I'd much appreciate if you could put them on the talk page of this sandbox. Thanks, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The TWO's would be useful too :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:46, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tapah

Thank you very much :) --An ha mi rak 11:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:IRC

I can't get on IRC right now. Just send me the link on my talk page and reference the 1998 NIO changes you made. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about referencing it now, I'm going to do some work on it now that we have the BT. Thanks for the link :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:40, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: BOB 03

Hahaha, I just uploaded the track when you posted that on my talk page. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:03, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the 1996 Atlantic hurricane season

You wouldn't mind if I submitted this to FLC, would you? Julian's comment tempted me to submit the list, but yours and Cyclonebiskit's comments are sorta holding me back. I wanted to ask them both as well, but they've been offline for a few hours (and I regrettably don't expect them back online for a while). Cheers, Dylan 620 (contribs, logs) 22:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks

They don't need to be contacted about the email, but they need to know that there was significant impact from the storm and that is missing from their report on it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the 1987 Atlantic hurricane season

Hi Jason. I've added a comment regarding that complex reference at the FLC. It would be good if we could find a mutually acceptable solution and progress the currently-stalled FLC. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I responded. There's no easy way around this other than the publishing of a HURDAT article until the Atlantic hurricane reanalysis gets current, which is still years off. Thegreatdr (talk) 16:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Welcome

Thank you! If you need for something, please contact me. (I'm participating more actively on Portuguese Wikipedia, doing that kind of article - after all, my English is still a bit poor). :) -Ramisses (talk) 21:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:EPAC

Hi, I was using my iPod touch to view what has happened since I took a break, and I accidentally pressed rollback in my watchlist :P. Oh, I won't be editing for a while. Darren 23 (Contribs) 19:01, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retired Names

Hello Jason,

By any chance, would you have a source that has all the Australian (preferably Brisbane) retirees? I need it for the Cyclone Rona (1999) article because I strongly suspect Rona of being retired, but I need to be sure.

Thanks --An ha mi rak 19:50, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anhamirak has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

--An ha mi rak 19:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SPAC Retired redirects

I can't finish those redirects really fast on my own, I already had 3 double redirects cause I wanted to do it fast, care to help me make some of them? Darren 23 (Contribs) 13:15, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Later - im on my way out shoppingJason Rees (talk) 13:17, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, see you later. Darren 23 (Contribs) 13:20, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SPAC

So I'll just do Perth, Jakarta, and Darwin?

--An ha mi rak 19:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source needed

Hi Jason. Your DYK suggestion for HURDAT needs a source saying its contents is what the hook says it is. Thanks. -SusanLesch (talk) 22:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. Thanks for your prompt response. -SusanLesch (talk) 23:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries :) Jason Rees (talk) 00:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for HURDAT

On August 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article HURDAT, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 20:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Problem with Cyclone Cliff

While working on the retired Australian names template, I found that there was a Cyclone Cliff retired in 1981. This means that both articles will have to have the name in the title. Can you make a disambiguation page for this name too? Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Later when i feel better :)Jason Rees (talk) 14:19, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

I reopened Wikipedia:Peer review/Tropical cyclone scales/archive1 and made some comments there - Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 20:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AHS

When you Reverted my Edit I kinda find it unfair. I meah the latest Advisory kept it at 30 knots so ok. But before that when you did it was unfair. I saw others doing it before the NHC on Best Track but didn't get Reverted... 98.193.34.53

Its not unfair - We shouldnt be using NRL for upgrades/downgrades whilst i storm is active also when i checked the RBT it was not showing up anything for 1800z.Jason Rees (talk) 20:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maka

Hello, How did you know that the JMA says that Maka has 25 kts? --An ha mi rak 15:54, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its simple enough to work out + its stated somewhere that a TD is 25kts to 30kts and the JMA ussually say when its over 30kts.Jason Rees (talk) 16:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 pacific typhoon season

Hello, my editings in Tropical Storm Maka or JMA TD 13 is correct. sorry, if I'm not putting references. next time, I will put. thanks for reminding.User:Jpuligan_12..=)14:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

inuse

plz hurry with your changes bcz a current event article rapidly makes changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.113.186.162 (talk) 19:56, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will take my time thankyou very much so i can make the article better. Jason Rees (talk) 20:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA reviews

Hi. Please remember to use the edit summary "GA pass" or something similar when passing GAs (i.e. putting the {{GA}} template on the talk page. Also, I noticed that you passed 8 GAs today. Be sure that you are reviewing articles thoroughly as according to the GA criteria. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 19:48, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am throughly reviewing them according to the GA Critera. :) Jason Rees (talk) 19:54, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Lin (2009)

Hello, I did a GA review on Cyclone Lin (2009) and found a few things to be fixed. They are at Talk:Cyclone Lin (2009)/GA2 --An ha mi rak 20:26, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Wat was that ?

It's just barely a Cat:4, 115kts and besides, it's still just barely weaker than Bill was. Bill peaked at 115kts and the lowest pressure was 943mbar, Vamco's lowest pressure is 945mbar :P Cyclonebiskit (talk) 12:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can't use the NRL or JTWC pressure as it's unofficial and just a set pressure for each windspeed, they'll revise that pressure to 937mbar which is the set pressure for 115kts outside the NHC AoR. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 12:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) The lead really needed to be expanded as that's what most people read in the articles since it's a summary of the entire thing. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Trackmap but with a difference

I wish I could but without the help of the creator of the program, I can't do any more than I've already done. I don't know how to expand the maps to include everything, I don't know how to limit the maps to a certain basin, and I don't know how to outline a region. Sorry, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Waterspout

Fixed two of the issues you raised. Can't find the reference which is not in cite web format though. Need to know which one has the issue. Thegreatdr (talk) 16:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Eliceca

Hello,

This is really not that important, but in the 1994-95 season, La Reunion had the name Eliceca on the list. However, I can't find it in the IBt or La Reunion's own best track. Also, there are no JTWC systems that crossed into the SWIO. Did they skip Eliceca?

Thanks --Anhamirak 21:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Cyclone Keli

On September 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cyclone Keli, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Jake Wartenberg 05:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 2009 PTS

Well, as I read the meteorological history of JMA TD 20, it is clear to me now that the depression didn't make its landfall BUT only a direct hit only in Đà Nẵng, Quảng Nam and Quảng Ngãi, Vietnam.haha.now I understand.thanks.take care.....=)Jpuligan-12 (talk) 16:00, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IMD

Hello, What did you mean with the comment on the NIO season page?

Thanks --Anhamirak 16:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Jason, this was inappropriate use of rollback. When reverting edits made in good faith, please use undo or Twinkle with a summary for the revert. Cheers, Dylan 620 (contribs, logs)^{help us!} 23:28, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I'm being a bit more AGF-y, but that edit struck me as a good-faith edit. My assumption is that Scropius9 thought that Danny still had an article, and missed Darren's merging of it. --Dylan 620 (contribs, logs)^{help us!} 23:36, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Work on me

User:Jason Rees/Mujigae

We were too late: Tropical storm Mujigae (2009). It has his standard MH section (essentially unreferenced) but it also has some impact (which is flat-out unreferenced). I'll see what I can do to help once you wake up. -- RattleMan 08:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Heads up

ah . ...ok..thanks.have a nice day..User:Jpuligan_12 September 15, 2009 1125 (UTC)

Typhoon Koppu (2009)

Hey, are you doing also an article to Koppu? thanks User:Jpuligan_12 16 September 2009 (1540) UTC.

Late 1980s hurricane videos

I know the person who took them...and he sent me the links weeks ago. I've seen a couple before. Thanks for the thought though. =) Thegreatdr (talk) 11:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:1996–97 South Pacific cyclone season

Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Hawaii#ScholarSpace_at_University_of_Hawaii_at_Manoa and User_talk:Viriditas#scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu. The PDF links are not stable due to repository moves and reorganizations. According to the site itself, they insist on using the hdl.handle.net to maintain a persistent link to the PDF. The PDF is still located on that page, but the link is now updated. There is a reason the site says, "Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/2184". Hard links to PDF's on scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu* are discouraged by the site. The PDF is still located at the link, but you have to access it with another link at the bottom. FYI... the ncdc.noaa.gov link you have on that list is 404. That's what is going to happen if you keep linking to scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu. Viriditas (talk) 21:25, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WPTC Assessment

Hi! Since you have recently posted to WT:WPTC or otherwise been involved with tropical cyclone articles, please nominate and review pages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment so we can revive this process. Thanks in advance, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Typhoon Choi-wan (2009)

Hello! Your submission of Typhoon Choi-wan (2009) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! cmadler (talk) 14:31, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JMA Tropical Depression 25 (Ondoy)

Jason, will I ask you a favor? Can you create a main page of TD 25 (Ondoy)? Because the damage of this depression in my country is now severe. I wil do the Impact and Preparations then you will made the meteorological history. thanks...=)..User:Jpuligan_12 25 - September 2009 1710 (UTC).

Ok...thanks for the cooperation..haha..have a nice day there..=) User:Jpuligan_12 25 - September 2009 1815 (UTC)

September 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2009 Pacific typhoon season. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. User Typhoon2009 has also been warned regarding this. Alan (talk) 14:15, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're being discussed at ANI

See WP:ANI#Misinformation in 2009 Pacific typhoon season. EdJohnston (talk) 15:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm Ketsana

On 26 September 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Tropical Storm Ketsana (2009), which you updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

— Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:26, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Current Events Barnstar
		For exemplary work on Typhoon Ketsana (2009). Bearian (talk) 22:31, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wind

Hi Jason. I added image File:Bride and groom on the ruins of sutro bath.jpg. IMO this image is one of the best, or the best to show the wind brcause there is only one thing that could have been picked up by the wind and it was, and because it is a high resolution, high quality , and good composition image. IMO it could be tried for FP. The image was removed two times. May I please ask you what is your opinion about adding the image to the article? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Jason.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to add it into the article, the only problem I see is that the bride's veil will barely be seen when the image is shrunk to a 250 or 200px resolution. The article is way too large to be seen in its full resolution/size within the article. Thegreatdr (talk) 14:28, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 PTS protection

I've asked Malinaccier (talk · contribs) to drop the protection the 2009 PTS, since it's currently unmanageable. My thinking is that we can deal with the edit warriors individually. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:17, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Typhoon Choi-wan (2009)

On September 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Typhoon Choi-wan (2009), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Kanonkas : Talk 04:43, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Parma

Jason, lets create a main article about Parma. This typhoon will have a devastating bad effect in Philippines and nearby countries. I will be assigned in Preparations and Impact. Thanks..Jpuligan_12 (talk), 30 - September - 2009, 08:06 (UTC)

Jason, I added preparations with references in the Philippines in Typhoon Parma. When this main article will coming out in the 2009 pacific typhoon season? Jpuligan_12 (talk), 1 - October - 2009, 12:55 (UTC)

Then, how about its meteorological history? you will gonna finish it today? Jpuligan_12 (talk), 1 - October - 2009, 16:23 (UTC)

Jason, what time/date will the meteorological history of Parma will finish?

In addition, Parma and Melor made a Fujiwhara effect..wow..haha.Have a nice day!Jpuligan_12 (talk) 6 October 2009, 19:11 (UTC)

Super Typhoon Melor

Jason, since Melor is now the strongest storm in 2009 Pacific typhoon season we must do a main article of this. In fact, did this super typhoon made a devastating damage in Guam and nearby islands?...thanks..Jpuligan_12 (talk) 4 October 2009, 05:23 (UTC)

Ike Changes?

Why did you self-revert yourself when someone put what I think is incorrect information? It's not on the TCR, just checked. Darren 23^Edits|Mail 00:53, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to that, I want to update the Season effects chart so anything like Parma and Melor's landfall locations could you please tell me what I need either on the uneasy IRC or by here on wiki. Darren 23^Edits|Mail 01:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject report

JR, just wanted to let you know that I replaced your answer on the WikiProject report with my own so as to keep everything consistent. Hopefully this is acceptable, but if not I'll happily revert. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:56, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Favor on Parma

Jason, can I ask you a favor? Can you finish the meteorological history of Typhoon Parma until Saturday, October 17 2009? Because we have a project in my school about this typhoon. Just only needing your help. Thanks. Hopefully you will finish it..Jpuligan_12 (talk) 13 - October - 2009, 10:30 (UTC).

Oh! Thanks. hopefully you will really finished it in the early time. Jpuligan_12 (talk) 14 October 2009, 12:53 (UTC).

Ok.Thank you very much.take care.god bless.Jpuligan_12 (talk) 17 October 2009, 13:50 (UTC).

Ummm...

Why the heck do you not want invests on here, when you are trying to put non-official designations on tropical depressions? That's messed up. BIG TIME. At least I am putting true information! Syntheticalconnections (talk) 14:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have one last thing to say to you. Did it ever come to mind, that the official agencies, don't recognize unofficial depression designations? Did it??? Syntheticalconnections (talk) 19:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Melor

Thanks ;) --Anhamirak 20:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

What was this about? Offliner (talk) 12:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An accidental revert apologies. Jason Rees (talk) 12:49, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: PAGASA

So, should we move Parma and Ketsana to Typhoon Parma and Typhoon Ketsana? (Same would go for Fengshen if we follow this. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i'm so sorry

Actually Dylan showed me the update earlier but still I'm sorry... -IrfanFaiz 01:34, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Super Typhoon Lupit

Jason, let's create a main article of Typhoon Lupit. I'm sure that this typhoon will have a wide destruction in my country.Thanks..Jpuligan_12 (talk) 19 October 2009, 11:20 (UTC).

== October 2009 == Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to 2009 Pacific typhoon season, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please, if you have a source, don't just mention it in the edit summaryas you did in this edit, use a proper citation. Toddst1 (talk) 22:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC) Toddst1 (talk) 22:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Toddst1, I have quite a bit of respect for you, but please don't give condescending templates (including "Welcome to Wikipedia") to rollbackers with years of experience and 14,000 edits. Sometimes hand-written notes are better-suited for the situation. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Julian is right - I hadn't realized your history. Let's try it this way: What's up with this edit? I blocked a user for edit warring on ~~that~~ similar info in the same article this week and you know that's not how we cite things. If there was a proper citation in there with access date/time as is appropriate for rapidly changing info, perhaps there wouldn't have been an edit war. Additional comment here. Toddst1 (talk) 15:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply on my talk page. I've also commented on User talk:Jpuligan 12.

As I attempted to acknowledge above, Julian is right and I shouldn't have used a template and it was not my intent to be disrespectful. You're a solid contributor and we all take shortcuts sometimes. No need to give you a hard time about it. Without looking closely enough it looked like Jpuligan 12's issue continued. Sorry for the ruffled feathers here (not that you have feathers 8-). Toddst1 (talk) 20:57, 21 October 2009 (UTC) ‎ ‎[reply]

Re:Cease and Delist

Done and sorry for the trouble. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home

Low-pressure area

Hi Jason. I'm rather concerned at the use of jargon in Low-pressure area. The article is very difficult to understand for the average reader, so would not - as it stands - meet GA criteria. I have started a WP:GAR, and my concerns are here. Regards SilkTork *^YES! 11:32, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the "Most Intense Tropical Cyclones" article

Hi Jason. Thanks for reverting the article of the "Most Intense Tropical Cyclones". I am a first-time editor so I didn't know how to revert. Anyways, I tried to edit Super Typhoon "Gay" and "Zeb" because it was written there that it had a 900 mb of pressure but according to a Wikipedia article attributed to Super Typhoon Gay (1992), it had a minimum central pressure of 872 mbars. Same thing could be said for Zeb so I tried to edit it. I haven't tried the "preview" option first before saving. My apologies for the mess and thanks for reverting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rex 1213 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Tropical Storm Etau (2009)/GA1

I'm starting a GA review at Talk:Tropical Storm Etau (2009)/GA1. You had posted a note there about a required update. Do you recall what the update concerned? Is there still an outstanding update on it? --maclean (talk) 07:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello,

I have seen that you have put up the "Changes at RSMC La Reunion" on the 09-10 SWIO talk page. By any chance could you send me the link to the report.

Thank you --Anhamirak 17:31, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --Anhamirak 17:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Depression 25W of the Northwest Pacific is already a Tropical Storm

Hi Jason. I just want to inform you that TD 25W has already been upgraded by the JTWC as a Tropical Storm. I made an edit on the article because I saw the latest report of JTWC calling the depression Tropical Storm 25W. Here is the link to their latest report. [15] It says there that it got 35 knots of wind with gusts of up to 45 knots. --Rex 1213 (talk) 23:05, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay so you are basing on the JMA reports. Alright thanks.!--Rex 1213 (talk) 23:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah you're right. I'm still kinda confused.. You mean the 10-min sustained winds on the articles of the Pacific Typhoon seasons here on Wikipedia are based on JMA whereas the 1-min sustained winds are based on JTWC's? --Rex 1213 (talk) 03:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. =) --Rex 1213 (talk) 03:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "Tropical cyclones and Airplane crashes", why not "Tropical Cyclone-related tragedies?" on List of Tropical Cyclones page

Hmmmm.. I have just thought about this one all over and I think there are far too many tragedies related to tropical cyclones than we might even know. So I've decided not to further change that section since it will be just a useless documentation of millions of disaster. So, shall we remove it or not? And sorry for a delayed response about this.