Wikipedia:Peer review/University of Valle/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
Greetings. I've listed this article for peer review because I want to continue improving the article to FA status. I'm not a native English speaker, so there might be some issues with redaction. I count with enough bibliographic material to improve the contents of the sections. I think the weakest ones are the History, Organization and Research sections. Also, I would like to know what information should be added and if what kind of figures should be included. Thanks, Andremun (talk) 03:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Doing... Ruhrfisch ><>°° 17:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by David Fuchs
Overall it's a very good article. Not surprisingly, the biggest issue I see is with the prose. Since your goal is FA, I compared this article to other university FAs such as University of Michigan and Duke University, and didn't see much in the way of gaps in coverage. You've got history, administration, the campus, activities, et al.
- As you've said, there are issues with the prose. You're going to need a good copyeditor; I can try and fix things where possible but that's not enough to get anything to "brilliant" standard. Generally I see incorrect tense and possessive use, along with redundant commas as the major issues.
- On the images: File:Uvtexto.gif and File:Univalle.svg are not the author's to release into the public domain or license according to GNU. You could argue that the logo is simple enough to be ineligible for copyright, but either way they are incorrectly licensed and the uploader is not the author.
- I'm concerned that non-free images are used in a decorative fashion, for example File:University of Valle First Campus.jpg, File:University of Valle San Fernando Campus.jpg, and File:Univalle Biblioteca Mario Carvajal Construcción.jpg don't have real fair use rationales at all, let alone compelling ones. Likewise, File:Univalle Proyecto Campus Carbonera Palmira.jpg
- Given the evidence, I'm going to assume that File:Estudiantes-fai.jpg, File:Cdu-piscina.jpg and File:FacultadSaludUnivalle.jpg were not taken by the uploader and should be deleted as copyright violations.
- Sources should be fully formatted, giving publisher, author, date info where available; since you're using {{cite web}}, just fill the rest out.
- I'm somewhat concerned that the vast majority of the information is sourced to non-independent sources (i.e., the college or material the college has published itself.) That creates bias issues...
--Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 21:31, 11 November 2009 (UTC)