Jump to content

Talk:Horror vacui (physics)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 188.100.201.34 (talk) at 05:44, 15 November 2009 (Really discounted?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPhysics Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Really discounted?

It is my impression that the general principle is still considered valid (and in perfect accordance with observational evidence). The one point of critique would be a fundamental misunderstanding of how sucking works. (Namely, not an active effort by a vacuum, a vacuum cleaner, a straw drinker, ..., but a passive lack of counter-pressure.)

While the interpretation may be less literal today than in ancient Greece, it is still, IMO, a valid principle.

(Unless the article has skipped over some parts of the theory not present in the "common knowledge" interpretation of the phrase.) 188.100.201.34 (talk) 05:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]