Jump to content

Wikipedia:Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 99.224.221.9 (talk) at 21:47, 16 November 2009 (→How to sugest new photo names?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    ↑ To top of page
    Shortcuts
    Welcome—ask questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia! (Am I in the right place?)
    • For other types of questions, use the search box, see the reference desk or Help:Contents. If you have comments about a specific article, use that article's talk page.
    • Do not provide your email address or any other contact information. Answers will be provided on this page only.
    • If your question is about a Wikipedia article, draft article, or other page on Wikipedia, tell us what it is!
    • Check back on this page to see if your question has been answered.
    • For real-time help, use our IRC help channel, #wikipedia-en-help.
    • New editors may prefer the Teahouse, a help area for beginners (but please don't ask in both places).
    Ask a question


    November 13

    Aviation and Airports

    How much does it cost and airliner to use the airport for the planes. Basically how much does it cost to rent a hanger? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.120.16.131 (talk) 01:23, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    This page is for questions about using Wikipedia. Please consider asking this question at the Miscellaneous reference desk. They specialize in knowledge questions and will try to answer any question in the universe (except how to use Wikipedia, since that is what this Help Desk is for). Just follow the link and ask away. You could always try searching Wikipedia for an article related to the topic you want to know more about. I hope this helps. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    download

    how to download an article from wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shonchrox (talk • contribs) 01:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    If you're reading an article while logged in, there will be a link on the left side of the page, to convert the article to a PDF, which you can save on your computer. It's one of the last links on the bottom. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:28, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Picture upload

    Hi,

    A guest here.

    Can someone with the appropriate authorizations please receive from me by mail a serie of photographs I've created and upload them globally & freely, so one can use them within some relevant articles on several language-wikis?

    It should be noted that I'm an active editor on some 4 language editions.

    Thanks in advance

    /O 02:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.0.113.254 (talk) :"...I'm an active editor on some 4 language editions." Then log in with your SUL account and upload them yourself (you can request permission at WP:RFPERM). I assume you know how, but in case not, see WP:UPLOAD. Intelligentsium 03:31, 13 November 2009 (UTC) :::...Why assume I know how...??.. -Well no, I knew not about these options. /O 03:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Never mind; just log in with your SUL account at Commons: and upload them there. Intelligentsium 03:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Aha, thanx. Does it mean I necessarily have to create a registered-account or so? Again - all I requested was that someone with the right authorization get my files through. /Orrling 03:41, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

    Admin help please re File:Guitarist.jpg

    Resolved
     – --Unionhawk Talk E-mail Review 02:51, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    A new user inadvertently uploaded a different image with this name over an existing image. Would an admin please undo? Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 02:47, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Apparently, any user (or maybe just rollbackers) can revert this.  Done--Unionhawk Talk E-mail Review 02:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess I should have tried before asking - thanks for the tip! – ukexpat (talk) 02:54, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Delete My Page

    Tammie Souza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    How do I delete my entire page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tammie.souza (talk • contribs) 03:17, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    There is no such thing as your page. All pages belong to the Wikipedia community, unless you mean your userpage, in which case you can put {{db-u1}} at the top. Intelligentsium 03:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Articles can be nominated for deletion, at which point community discussion will work out where we sit. I've noticed that discussion generally takes the subject's wishes into account, but in this case you are very well respected as a weather forecaster, and it may be that the consensus would be to keep the article. You may find some good advice at the help page for biographies of living people, and I would add that if your concern relates to some of the personal information - such as date of birth - that was included in the article, it may be possible to raise that on the talk page, as we do have policies regarding protecting people's privacy. - Bilby (talk) 03:38, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    You could also try the BLP Noticeboard if there are persistent BLP problems with the article. --Bfigura (talk) 03:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    As an aside, the editor seems to want to remove information about her son (which seems reasonable, since it's a birthday, which isn't necessarily public info) and her prior acting career (about which I'm less certain -- there appears to be a reference or two supporting it). -- Bfigura (talk) 03:59, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:OVERSIGHT and WP:OTRS would be good links, then, as well. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 21:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Whats with the WP Forever thing

    That damn Wikipedia forever bar at the top of the site reads like a bad batman movie title. Whose bright idea was it to add that here? And how long is the stupid eyesore going to be around? - Daniel Cordova —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.108.67.131 (talk) 03:45, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    As long as the foundation wants it to be, but roughly a week I think. You can permanently remove it by going into your preferences, going to gadgets, and selecting the box to hide the banner. -- Bfigura (talk) 03:52, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    ...if you have an account. (if I'm not mistaken) Dismas|(talk) 05:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    If it helps, none of us who write Wikipedia like it much either -- but we can't do much about it. :-( -- llywrch (talk) 05:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


    Well, it isn't an advertisement, or if anything, it's an internal advertisement. I'd rather see something like that on top of every page than whatever ad Google Adwords deems appropriate for a particular page. There is honestly nothing incredibly annoying about it, and if you really despise a box asking you to donate for the sake of knowledge, than simply disable it or have it shrink. Think of it as a small sacrifice so that you can view and contribute to an immense amount of shared knowledge amongst many people in the world. Don't think too much of it.

    Ojay123 (Talk•E-Mail•Contribs•Sandbox)(Respond on my talk page! 00:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Uneditable template?

    I want to nominate the template "Tracy Gable films" (e.g. in Boom Town (film)) for deletion, but I can't edit it to add the tag. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:11, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    It's here. Somehow the edit button got linked to the wrong name. --Bfigura (talk) 04:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Fixed the name link problem. Clicking the 'e' in the upper left of the box should work now. --Bfigura (talk) 04:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Bold Title Automatically

    Is there a tool that, when you go to a page where the title isn't bolded, bolds it for you? If not, I just created one. Would anyone try it out? Just put the following script into your monobook.js file. This will add a tab that says bold when you are viewing an article, and when you click on it, it will automatically bold the title. 

    importScript('User:Btilm/bt.js');

    Thanks. Btilm 04:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi Btilm, the help desk isn't really the ideal place to post this, it is a page only for questions about using Wikipedia. Cheers SpitfireTally-ho! 10:15, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts - they have a page where you can add your script for others to use. — QuantumEleven 13:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Dr. Lionel David Harry

    Dr Lionel David Harry, a bible student from Teamwork University USA achieves Doctorate Of Ministry degree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.210.163.73 (talk) 08:14, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    • I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our over 6 million articles and thought we were affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is for asking questions related to using or contributing to Wikipedia itself. Thus, we have no special knowledge about the subject of your question. You can, however, search our vast catalogue of articles by typing a subject into the search field on the upper right side of your screen. If you cannot find what you are looking for, we have a reference desk, divided into various subject areas, where asking knowledge questions is welcome. Best of luck. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 15:19, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    notes and references tutorial.

    Could you please help me find the detailed tutorial for notes and references. How are notes and references made. I am trying to finalize a couple of wiki pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bak0ne (talk • contribs) 10:35, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Citation templates and Wikipedia:Footnotes should help. If not, please feel free to ask a more detailed question here. — QuantumEleven 13:09, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Was this harassment?

     ClosedNot the right place for this. -- Bfigura (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

    I was deeply concerned to discover that another user accused me of harassment, and deleted a post I made about four hours ago to the talk page for the medical cannabis article on that basis. I'd really appreciate an opinion or two as to whether or how I might have been out of line, or whether I can reasonably revert to preserve the comment/query I made there. I addressed the objection and deletion here, btw, on my talk page, and asked the deleting user to restore my post. ( I'd be perfectly happy to edit out the time-of-day observations I made, before reposting, if folks here think that advisable, and if reposting seems appropriate. ) Thanks! Ohiostandard (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Actually i am more concern with the way User:Viriditas dealt with this..deleting post that did not concern him and a some what of a threatening post to you (Ohiostandard)Buzzzsherman (talk) 17:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Buzzsherman, I suggest you look into this more closely. Medical cannabis has been plagued by trolls, sock puppets, and POV pushers for some time now. Ohiostandard ignored several open threads regarding concerns about the content and launched into a bad faith attack on User:Alfie66, questioning his good work, and asking him to reveal personal information. I have informed Ohiostandard that this is not the place to file a COI notice, and that he should take it to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Furthermore, Ohiostandard is trying to wikilawyer over outing other editors, and his assessment about the other users edits is in error, as the user has made a significant effort to improve the article, including discussing his edits, usually before making them. Viriditas (talk) 22:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Viriditas, all the facts are already available to people here, so let's allow them to answer the question on their own, please. Because you've stated a preference that our own dialogue should remain on my talk page I'll not reply further here; I am still awaiting your reply on my talk page, however. Opinions on this question from additional editors that neither of us have interacted with most welcome, including contrary opinions, of course. Thanks. Ohiostandard (talk) 01:26, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Here are the facts: WP:TALK, WP:NPA, WP:COI, WP:SCOIC: "Comment on content, not on the contributor: Keep the discussions focused upon the topic of the talk page, rather than on the personalities of the editors contributing to the talk page....Behavior that is unacceptable: No personal attacks: A personal attack is saying something negative about another person...Never post personal details...The talk page is for discussing improving the article...What is considered to be a personal attack? Using someone's affiliations as an ad hominem means of dismissing or discrediting their views—regardless of whether said affiliations are mainstream. Note that although pointing out an editor's relevant conflict of interest and its relevance to the discussion at hand is not considered a personal attack, speculating on the real life identity of another editor may constitute outing, which is a serious offense...When investigating possible cases of COI editing, Wikipedians must be careful not to reveal the identity of other editors. Wikipedia's policy against harassment takes precedence over this guideline on conflict of interest. An editor's conflict of interest is often revealed when that editor discloses a relationship to the subject of the article to which the editor is contributing...Editors with a conflict of interest are permitted to contribute to Wikipedia, so long as they abide by other policies and guidelines, including avoiding controversial edits on articles where they have a conflict...The first approach should be direct discussion of the issue with the editor, referring to this guideline...Editors responding to such a COI-compliant suggestion should...Make a polite summary of your concerns on the user's talk page. If persuasion fails, consider whether you are involved in a content dispute. If so, an early recourse to dispute resolution may help. Another option is to initiate discussion at WP:COIN, where experienced editors may be able to help you resolve the matter without recourse to publishing assertions and accusations on Wikipedia. Using COI allegations to harass an editor or to gain the upper hand in a content dispute is prohibited, and can result in a block or ban....Wikipedia places importance on both the neutrality of articles and the ability of editors to edit pseudonymously. Do not out an editor's real life identity in order to prove a conflict of interest. Wikipedia's policy against harassment prohibits this. Suspected conflict of interest incidents may be reported on the conflict of interest noticeboard..." Viriditas (talk) 01:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Once again: All the facts are already available, so let's give people the space to answer the question. Ohiostandard (talk) 05:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    This isn't the appropriate venue. This page exists for questions on how to use wikipedia. I'd ask everyone to take several deep breaths, perhaps have some tea, and if necessary post on Wikiquette alerts or the conflict of interest noticeboard. --Bfigura (talk) 05:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

    I do not want my article merged

    Hello,

    I am trying to create an article on ANTIQUE Persian carpets. My article has been deleted and threatened to be deleted because of wanting a merger with Persian carpets. How do I keep the content of my article? Can I write an article on antique rugs and include a section on Persian rugs without it being merged? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antiquerugs32 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Couple of points: It's not your article, you may have created it but once it's in the mainspace it is freely editable by other editors; if you want to argue against merger, please contribute to the merger discussion. If however the consensus is that it be merged, then it will be merged. – ukexpat (talk) 19:09, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    And please stop adding inappropriate external links, such as this one, to articles. – ukexpat (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Check the alternative outlets, and see WikiIndex where you might find another wiki with content rules more to your liking. You can edit on as many other wikis as you like, in addition to, or instead of, Wikipedia. The wiki whose goals are closest to your own will make you happiest. See Flow (psychology). The greatest satisfaction comes from knowing exactly what to do. Having your worked overruled and second-guessed takes the fun out of it. --Teratornis (talk) 22:31, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Now we've gone and frightened him, so he's started editing as User:Nazmiyal instead! --Orange Mike | Talk 00:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Donating

    Do I get any perks for donating?Accdude92 (talk to me!) (sign) 20:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Nope, just a fuzzy, warm feeling inside. – ukexpat (talk) 20:18, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, Wikipedia remains free of any non-voluntary costs and free of ads thanks to its donors. SpitfireTally-ho! 20:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    You help keep a great service alive for another year. Isn't that reward enough? Plus, you get that nice feeling of helping someone else in their time of financial need. The sensation of "Hey, I helped" is always FAR GREATER than any monetary or other material reward. Unfortunately, this value - the willingness to help others without anything in return - seems to have been lost on those of the most recent generation. Xenon54 / talk / 20:55, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Doesn't wikipedia get enough donations?Accdude92 (talk to me!) (sign) 20:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Probably - WMF was several million US dollars in the black on their last financial report. But you have to use common sense: if they had enough money, they wouldn't be asking for donations (and they definitely wouldn't be plastering "Wikipedia FOREVER" all over the place). If everyone thought "eh, enough other people donate, so I don't have to this year", then there wouldn't be any donations. Xenon54 / talk / 21:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Wikipedia has by far the lowest operating costs of any other Web site of similar popularity (such as Google and Yahoo!), but running Wikipedia still costs money. Wikipedia is like a helicopter hovering in flight. It can stay aloft as long as it has more fuel to burn. Even if there is plenty of fuel in the tank now, getting more fuel buys more time. Also, having lots of small donors probably makes it easier for WMF to attract some large donors. The many small donors give credibility to the project. In any case, charitable giving is not something a person needs to be talked into. To some people, giving to causes they believe in is the obvious thing to do. To those people we owe all progress. So I say thanks to all of Wikipedia's donors. --Teratornis (talk) 22:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Scaling svg files

    Hi, I was interested in looking at the graphic on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia-servers-2009-04-05.svg, but a lot of the text is too small to be legible. Because this is an svg image I assume that it should be possible to expand it to any size, and hence read the text, but I can't figure out how to do this. I don't want to download the file, and don't see why I should have to -- and in any case I don't, as far as I know, have any software that could display it. I'm using IE 8. Any ideas anyone? 21:51, 13 November 2009 (UTC). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.242.27 (talk)

    You can go to the file's page on Wikimedia Commons (:Commons:File:Wikimedia-servers-2009-04-05.svg), where there is an option to render the svg as a png in various sizes, the largest of which is 2000px wide (3 times wider than the average computer desktop). Hopefully, IE will allow you to zoom in on the png and make it readable - though be warned: I wouldn't put anything past Microsoft when it comes to IE displaying stuff correctly. Xenon54 / talk / 22:31, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, that works fine. Since the image is currently not fully usable at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia-servers-2009-04-05.svg, I was going to transfer the list of higher-resolution links to that page from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia-servers-2009-04-05.svg but I don't see how it's been done. Have you any ideas on that? 86.152.242.27 (talk) 22:55, 13 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]
    I think that's a software feature (as opposed to something inserted using wikicode) and is thus only available on the wiki that the image is uploaded to. So that wouldn't be possible, sorry. Xenon54 / talk / 22:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    The problem (as often) is IE8 - the svg is actually (1,200 × 1,290 pixels), but the page shows a reduced view - if I click the image (in FF3.5) I get the full size picture - all IE8 does is offer to download the image. BTW Inkscape (freeware) will display svg files if you do download them  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:11, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't see how the problem is IE's. As you say, the svg is nominally 1,200 × 1,290 pixels. I assume these values are coded into the svg. The graphic displayed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedia-servers-2009-04-05.svg is actually a png, which I assume has been created from the svg by Wikipedia software. This png is apparently 558 x 600 pixels. So, Wikipedia seems to have ignored the specified size in the svg file (presumably set large precisely so that it is legible) and inappropriately chosen a smaller size. However, it's possible I may be totally misunderstanding what's going on. 86.150.102.78 (talk) 12:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]
    That is merely the preview image, which is smaller than the full size (this is true also of raster images, which are displayed smaller than their native resolutions). To see the full size image you click the link below, which will load the actual file. In most browsers this works fine, but Internet Explorer, to my knowledge, still lacks SVG support, which is why it tries to download the file to disk rather than display it in browser. As mentioned above if you go to the same file description page on Commons you get additional options to view "SVG rendered as PNG images in different resolutions" – 200px, 500px, 1000px and 2000px. For example, the 2000px version can be viewed here. Regards, AJCham 12:14, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Right, I see what you mean. It would be helpful if IE had native support for svg files, but, pending that, it might also be helpful if Wikipedia honoured the recommended size in its preview rendering. 86.150.102.78 (talk) 14:30, 14 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

    Messages

    How do you find out who has been editing a page and send messages to them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anakiniman (talk • contribs) 23:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    The history tab at the top of the page, and then go to the user's talk page and post an new section, signing your message with ~~~~. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 23:40, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    See more at Help:Page history and Help:Talk page. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:11, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    November 14

    Editing Problems

    I don't know how to edit some please help! (Darkspartan4121 (talk) 02:13, 14 November 2009 (UTC)) Lol you faill!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkspartan4121 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    See Help:Editing. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 02:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    You seem to have figured it out without this. Intelligentsium 03:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    A short, but not bad, article

    I have edited an article which is about as short as a stub, but it is only short because there isn't any more encyclopedic information that can be added to the article. It doesn't need cleanup, and it doesn't have any unsourced fancruft or anything of the like. Should it still be assessed as stub-class, even though (in my opinion) it is better quality? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Akrabbim (talk • contribs)

    Yep. No date of birth, place of birth, family information, educational background? Definitely a stub. Biographies are about more than discography! --Orange Mike | Talk 02:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmm. I guess there still is a lot missing. I guess just because it isn't poorly written or there isn't cleanup required doesn't matter if there are large amounts of information missing. Thanks. —Akrabbimtalk 04:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Researching obscure bios

    As a follow-up question, how would someone go about finding that sort of information? He doesn't have any kind of official bio written about him. I would like to know for some other bios, especially ones like Matt Thiessen, where early life/birthday is mentioned, but there is no source I could find that supplies that info. All the searching I have done only comes up with crappy Wikipedia mirrors. —Akrabbimtalk 04:58, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    This is a common problem. If you don't want to peruse local libraries, than Google scholar and google books are usually good methods. Worldcat can also be very useful. If you can't find any books or industry magazine that mention him, then basically, it's waiting until someone writes about him. :( —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 16:58, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Poor editing!

    I made a rather clumsy edit with poor choice of words. And I think that there is a proper way to add such information. Would anyone take a look and comment? Feel free to edit the line. (PS: Should the word book be replaced by the word novel?) --Siddhant (talk) 07:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Otheruses Ks0stm (T•C•G) 08:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Not poor editing at all, a simple mistake, but thats all. I've used {{Distinguish2|the novel of the same name by David Morrell}}, if you follow the link to Template:Distinguish2 and read the template documentation, I think you'll find it very useful incase you have future need of such templates. Hope this helps you, cheers SpitfireTally-ho! 09:01, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your comments and help. --Siddhant (talk) 07:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    re: pictures

    I have written two previous questions about copyrights. May I now ask general questions.

    I am writing a psychology book and I want to make many references to psychologists such as Sigmund Freud, Carl Rogers, Aaron Beck, etc. by placing their pictures in my book.

    1. Are pictures of faces copyrighted? 2. I have written to their websites to ask permission but they have not replied. Am I now free to place their pictures while acknowledging the URL where their pictures are found?

    Thank you.

    Gonzalo B. Misa —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonzalobmisa (talk • contribs) 13:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    1. Yes images of faces are copyrighted.
    2. No, lack of response does not nullify the copyright. You NEED permission of the original photographer/owner of the image.
    You can use advanced Google search to specify that you are looking for images that have a license that allows reuse of an image or even commercial use of an image. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 17:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    You can also contact something like Getty Images and buy photo's from them. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 17:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Copytright Question??

    Am i allowed to use the pictures on wikepedia?? I need to use quite a few pictures. i need your permission for my ict dida unit course, and if i can use the pictures and edit some of them using photoshop?

    please could you reply as soon as possible

    Dipali

    15:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)15:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)15:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)15:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)15:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)15:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)15:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)15:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)15:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)15:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)15:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)15:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.28.195.127 (talk)

    See Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content for more information on using Wikipedia content in other applications. With pictures, you must carefully check each picture's lisence. Some pictures are license under Wikipedia's CC-BY-SA or GFDL copy-left lisences, and have fairly easy reuse guidelines. Other pictures are used under "Fair Use" claims, and cannot be used outside of Wikipedia, as their copyright is held by places outside of Wikipedia. So, please read all of the relevent policies VERY carefully, and check each image file's information page (click the picture to see it) for full details on reusing images. --Jayron32 15:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Edits not saved

    Someone kindly created a page on me unfortunately it does not state some matters that are more significant and above all its out of date. I left it alone for a couple of years but my daughter has persuaded me that its important to get it right. So I created a new page yesterday and saved it and previewed a couple of times but it did not work - the previous page is just as it was. Please advise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.222.163.18 (talk) 15:46, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    We will be able to help you better, if you can tell us the name or topic of the page. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    My name is Tariq Modood Sotm (talk) 16:11, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    OK, this is a link to the discussion page of the article about your persona. I advice you to indicate any mistakes in the article right there. It is best if you can post links to newspaper articles, books or other reliable sources that can be used to verify these facts. Editing the article about yourself is usually discouraged due to our conflicts of interest guideline. If you do decide to edit, you should read that guideline and prepare your edits well. If you feel you need help getting your article sorted out, you can follow this guide that will help and direct you to people that will help you or take care of the problem. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 16:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you thats helpful. I think the best thing is if I send what I think is a better and updated article about myself and others can edit it etc and put it on the Wikipedia page. Can I send it as an email attachment to you? Or to whom? Sotm (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Actually, we'd encourage you to follow TheDJ's suggestion and post your comments to Talk:Tariq Modood. Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia, edited by many people from all over the world, and comments should be in a public place where everyone can see them, rather than emailed to one specific person. GlassCobra 17:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks, I'll do that. Sotm (talk) 17:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Copying and Pasting a Wikipedia Article

    Whenever I copy and paste a Wikipedia Article to a Word document, the "blue" words do not get transferred: Instead, what gets transferred is the web address of the Wikipedia article about the topic represented by the blue words. I'd like to be able to paste the original words, not the linkage. What do I need to do to allow this? (I'm on a Mac, if that matters.) Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChasPopper (talk • contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    If you post information about the browser+version and the microsoft word version that you are using, I can try and help, but it depends if I have that installed on my computer. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 17:11, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't have a Mac, but here are some things to try:
    • The PC version of Microsoft Word has a paste as text option which strips out all the markup. Maybe the Mac version has a similar option.
    • Another option on the PC is to paste into any text editor program. On the PC an example would be Notepad (Windows). On the Mac you might try TextEdit. You might have to figure out how to tell TextEdit that you want a plain text file. Once you get a plain text file, you can copy from there and paste into Word.
    • Lynx (web browser) displays pages in plain text format. It is extremely plain but that is what you want here.
    If you don't get a good answer here, ask again on Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing. --Teratornis (talk) 17:15, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    It will depend on your version of Word. Early versions did not support html, later ones do. If I select part of a page and copy into my Word - I get all the blue link words (and when I hover the mouse over a blue link) up pops a box that shows the link, with "ctrl+click to follow link". Alternatively if you select Edit... Paste Special from the menu, then you can just select "Unformatted Text" to paste the page with no links and or web addresses. My Word version is Word 2003.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:19, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    All you need to do is go to the article you'd like to copy, click on the link for "Printable version", which is the bottommost link on the toolbox on the lefthand side of the page. The resulting page will be able to be copied and pasted with no links. By the way, if you want to get rid of links in Word for Mac documents that have been transferred from the web, highlight the linked text and click Apple+K → remove link. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Size of Photo

    I successfully uploaded a photo into an article I am editing...but the photo is larger than I would like on the final saved page. I used photoshop and reduced the size of the image, and uploaded a second version, but the size remained the same on the new saved page.

    How do I reduce the size of the image?

    Buckyboot (talk) 18:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    I assume you mean "Elijah C. Wadhams". Your first photo was 900 × 1,162 pixels, and the second was 600 × 775 pixels. Note: You did not need to create a new photo page - you could have uploaded the smaller one onto the same page - it would have replaced the original. You may want to consider deleting one of them. The size of the picture shown is not fixed by the uploaded file, it's fixed by the "Image" line in the Article, which you have set at 325px - make that smaller and the picture will be smaller (or remove the size completely and it will revert to a default thumb).  Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you - that worked Buckyboot (talk) 20:28, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


    BTW: How do I delete a photo from my gallery? Buckyboot (talk) 20:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Can you explain what you mean by "gallery"? Plymouth, Pennsylvania has no gallery in the sense of the word I just linked, which is the sense I think many regulars would interpet it. If you mean how do I delete an image I uploaded locally, just go the image and place {{db-g7}}. An admin will then most likely delete it in a short time (in rare cases G7 requests are refused where the article or image is considered useful to be retained).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:38, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Images on Commons have different rules - see Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Speedy deletion  Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:22, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Hopefully A Fresh New Pair Of Eyes

    A few days ago, I asked

    You know how typing

    == Thingamajig ==

    will display a headline, then an edit box to the right, that you can click on ("edit" is in blue and square bracketed).

    How do I do this, but I don't want it to show up in the table of contents and you can't actually click on the "[edit]" to edit the section (the color should be retained).

    I've got a few answers, but they had a few variations: 


    {{col-begin}}
{{col-break}}
<font size = 4> Section Header </font>
{{col-break}}
<span style ="align:right">[<span style="color:#0000f1">edit</span>]</span>
{{col-end}}
----

    Jayron32 


    <pre><h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Header">Header</span></h2></pre>

<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Header">Header</span></h2>
    If the anchor is not needed, don't use spantag.

    Gadget850


    Anyone have any ideas or know how to fix the problems?


    I have my own idea. I could use a table:

    • Table has 2 columns; 1 row
    • Put <span style ="align:right">[<span style="color:#0000f1">edit</span>]</span> on the right column
    • Put <font size = 4>Section Header</font> in the left column

    But I need the table to have no color, no borders. No formatting in other words. How do I do that?174.3.111.148 (talk) 23:52, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    I believe if you have "__NOTOC__ __NOEDITSECTION__" somewhere on the page, that should achieve what you desire. To see its effects, check my userpage. GlassCobra 02:37, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Hhmmm, that makes ALL the sections uneditable. Is there a way to make specific sections uneditable?174.3.111.148 (talk) 03:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    It would help if we knew what you are trying to do. I think you can do this, but only as a template:
    {| border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%" style="background:transparent; border: none"
|-
| style="padding-left: 0.5em;" |
== {{{1}}} ==
| class="plainlinks" style="text-align: right; padding-right: 0.5em;" | {{#if:{{{1|}}}|[[{{fullurl:{{{1}}}|action=edit}} edit]]| }}
|}__NOEDITSECTION__
    When transcluded, the __NOEDITSECTION__ should apply only to the template. The parameter will is the heading title. If you wanted to edit a different subpage, change {{#if:{{{1|}}}|[[{{fullurl:{{{1}}}|action=edit}} edit]]| }} to {{#if:{{{2|}}}|[[{{fullurl:{{{2}}}|action=edit}} edit]]| }} where the second parameter is a subpage. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    November 15

    User Page

    I have recently changed my name but all or my previous edit counts, contributions are gone and I can't upload anything. Is there someway I can get it all back? Colleen16 (talk) 02:36, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Did you actually get a username change (ie. with WP:CHU), or did you simply just make a new account? The former will preserve your history and contributions, the latter will not. GlassCobra 02:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    How many contributions did you have before (if) you went through CHU? If you had a lot, your account may have been "broken". Intelligentsium 02:45, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Your username was successfully changed from Colleen16 to InkHeart, as you requested at Wikipedia:Changing username. Your edit count, contributions, user page, user talk page, etc. were moved to your new account, InkHeart. If you log in as InkHeart, you'll see everything. --Mysdaao talk 02:47, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    WP page hit counter

    Any suggestions as to the best one out there? hydnjo (talk) 03:18, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    This is the only one of which I am aware. Intelligentsium 03:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks Intelligentsium, that's exactly what I was looking for :) hydnjo (talk) 03:53, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Stalker

    There is en editor stalking my edits. What should I do? User:Mosmof has been going through all of my images and adding deletion tags on them. Colleen16 (talk) 06:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    You should assume good faith on the part of Mosmof, and participate civilly in the deletion discussions for those images. Also, please stick to posting with only one account. Since your rename you have switched back and forth between InkHeart and the recreated Colleen16 account. Please take care to ensure you are logged into the correct account. It may help to clear cookies and any saved passwords in your browser. AJCham 06:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Indeed. The images all appear to fail Wikipedia's fair use policy for re-using copyrighted work; therefore tagging them for deletion seems appropriate. If you have a reason why the images are NOT in violation of the fair use policy, you should raise those reasons at the deletion discussions linked from each image's information page. --Jayron32 06:42, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    1968 CALENDER

    WHICH WAS THE WEEK DAY ON JANUARY 20TH 1968 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.25.255 (talk) 08:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    These questions tend to be answered very easily simply by typing the keywords into Google: I did this for you, and it turns out the answer is in the first link. For future reference, this page is for asking questions about using Wikipedia. More general questions should be directed to the reference desk. Someguy1221 (talk) 09:24, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    For future reference, if you look at the 1968 article, you will find that with each "events" month, there should be a calendar for that month. In 1968's case, there wasn't one for January, for some reason - although I have now added it. Thanks for you question, as I wouldn't have noticed this otherwise! -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 17:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Phantomsteve, the calendar for January that you added shows January 1 to be a Tuesday, while the article lead says that the year started with a Monday. Please correct your mistake. Cheers, --Siddhant (talk) 07:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the note - although you could have corrected it yourself! It has now been corrected. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 15:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    How do you create an FAQ?

    Some articles, like Global warming, have an FAQ embedded in the discussion page so editors who watch the article don't have to answer the same question multiple times. It's been suggested that an FAQ be created for Scientific opinion on climate change. Unfortunately, I'm not finding any policy guidelines or instructions for creating an FAQ for a specific article. Where to I go?--CurtisSwain (talk) 09:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    There isn't one. In fact, this suggestion is the only linked mention of the FAQ template in namespace 4. Someguy1221 (talk) 09:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    That's what I'm looking for! Thanks guy!--CurtisSwain (talk) 09:37, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Newly registered; need a move

    Hi. I'm newly registered and computer illiterate... I can't understand and follow all your confusing instructions and links. I edited an article and decided to write my own as a result, to be a link from what I edited. I think I have propely made references, but a link I tried creating works when I type it into Google but not as itself. I guess I need help with RochelleCurtis/ThePalaceGuard in the wizard. I got so confused and frustrated with your tutorials and cross-references that I'm not sure I have done anything right. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by RochelleCurtis (talk • contribs) 11:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    According to your contributions, you have only made one edit (excluding this one) which was to add a missing band member. It is possible you did not save; you accidentally hit "Preview" instead. If so, I regret to say that you'll have to start over. Intelligentsium 17:17, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Rochelle. I'm sorry you're struggling with Wikipedia's instructions and tutorials. It's true that it can be a steep learning curve here at first, but there's a lot of help around if you need it. Creating a new article is one of the more complicated processes here, and some users don't do so for quite a while, preferring to make minor improvements and additions to existing articles while they find their way around and become familiar with how Wikipedia works. There's a lot of guidance aimed at those creating new articles, which is why you may be feeling a bit swamped with advice.
    Creating your article as a user subpage is a good idea, so you can work on it in your userspace with little risk of it being deleted. IIf you click on User:RochelleCurtis/The Palace Guard, type in the box, then save your work, you'll create the page you need. Don't hesitate to ask for further help with your article as it progresses. Karenjc 17:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Did you click on the Show Preview button instead of the Publish changes button?

    Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

     

    Empty This is a minor edit Tick Watch this page

    By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.

    Publish changes Show preview Show changes Cancel

    If you didn't click on Publish changes, the edit wasn't saved. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 17:58, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk pages of pages that became redirects

    What is one supposed to do with talk pages of pages which were later redirected to another page? Any guideline or advice on it? E.g., sometimes other names for things result in two parallel articles. One is later merged or redirected and they end up with parallel talk headers. Should they just be ignored, or redirected to the talk page of the new article, or redirected and merged if there are any posts worth salvaging? If not redirected, what about the {{WPBiography}} templates? Should I change class to stub (which is what I've been doing)? What about changing living to no, otherwise it appears on lists like Wikipedia:Uncategorized biographies of living people/BLPPotential. The instructions on those lists say to add "|non-bio=yes" but that does not actually seem to be a real parameter and does nothing. • Anakin (talk) 12:48, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Here are a few I did so you can see what I mean. They're all inconsistent: [1], [2], [3]. One could argue that they're all valid, but they all feel equally imperfect. • Anakin (talk) 12:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Your third example looks like the best solution. Redirect the talk page of the redirect to the talk page of the target article. When all we have for a person is a redirect of their name to some other article, I would argue that no 'biography' exists and there is no need to use a WPBiography template on anything related to them. If you create such a redirect, I agree that any useful content of the talk page should be merged to the talk page of the target. EdJohnston (talk) 14:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Creating pages

    hi how can i make my own page ~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamanshjain (talk • contribs) 13:49, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    A Wizard is available to walk you through these steps. See the Article Wizard.

    Thank you.
    Before creating an article, please search Wikipedia first to make sure that an article does not already exist on the subject. Please also review a few of our relevant policies and guidelines with which all articles should comply. As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles must not contain original research, must be written from a neutral point of view, should cite reliable sources which verify their content and must not contain unsourced, negative content about living people.
    Articles must also demonstrate the notability of the subject. Please see our subject specific guidelines for people, bands and musicians, companies and organizations and web content and note that if you are closely associated with the subject, our conflict of interest guideline strongly recommends against you creating the article.
    If you still think an article is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Your first article. You might also look at Wikipedia:How to write a great article for guidance, and please consider taking a tour through the Wikipedia:Tutorial so that you know how to properly format the article before creation. An Article Wizard is available to walk you through creating an article. GlassCobra 14:18, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    You have a user page which can be used to tell other Wikipedians a little about yourself and your interests in contributing and editing here. To start editing it, click on this link, type into the box and save. Please note that Wikipedia is not a web host or social network and isn't an appropriate place for lots of personal information unrelated to the purpose of the project, which is to build an encyclopaedia. There's guidance about what is and is not acceptable on a user page at WP:USERPAGE. As far as an article about yourself is concerned, GlassCobra's advice above is comprehensive and correct. Unless you're a notable subject for an encyclopaedia article, any article you do create about yourself will probably be deleted pretty quickly, and if you are notable enough for an article, you're probably not the best person to write it. Karenjc 17:06, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    .svg map not rendering properly

    I have converted the .svg image File:KøbenhavnMetroKort.svg to File:KøbenhavnMetroKort English.svg. I first uploaded the image, but it had a rendering error due to being saved as an Inkscape .svg instead of a generic .svg. I then (half a year later) uploaded a clean version of it. When I look at the file page, it looks fine, but when being rendered at List of Copenhagen Metro stations, it looks wrong. I have tried purging the image (on WP and Commons) and the article, and also tried to alter the image size, but it never seems to be able to render right. Arsenikk (talk) 14:06, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    .svg files are converted to .png in articles because more browsers support .png than .svg. Intelligentsium 16:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    It looks like the text is not scaling as well as the image (change the pic in the arcticle to 650px and it looks OK). Suggestions - is reduce the original map down to the size you plan for the article (500px?) (Inkscape - Object... Transform... Scale 500 x 278), - that looks OK in inkscape.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:39, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't believe that solution will work – the problems are due to the Verdana font face not being supported by the SVG rendering engine used on Wikimedia servers. You should change the font to one of the supported ones listed at m:SVG fonts, or convert the text to paths. AJCham 19:53, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    make a commons transfer please

    Good day, this file cant be licenced under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chernenko_FrontierGuard.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Russia-2008 Please, make everbody a transfer to commons. Commons got no other file with mr Chernenko. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredy.00 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Commons does not accept any images other than free images. Intelligentsium 16:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


    Your wrong understand -in time, where it file uploadet as "fair use" it dont exist new Russian laws (read a http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Russia-2008 )
    In this year, after 2008, it this file in public domain and cant be transfered to commons. --Fredy.00 (talk) 18:19, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Reason it, im got a ban at commons.
    Source and author it provided as "Soviet Gouverment" - beascue, im thing, this file cant by licenced as PD-Russia-2008, or as "PD-old". --Fredy.00 (talk) 18:29, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fredy,00, from what I can see, it cannot be uploaded to Commons under the PD-Russia-2008, as I don't think it meets the criteria. Its use on Wikipedia is OK under fair use, but fair use images cannot be put on Commons. As you say, you are blocked on Commons - but I can't see that the image can be hosted there anyway.
    Looking at the image on Wikipedia, the site given as a source is clearly identified as being copyrighted, and so the picture couldn't be used on Commons. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 18:36, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Incidently, the source for the image isn't actually Russia Today, but Russkaja Germanija, which also has a clear copyright on the image. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 18:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict)The source is here (click "Read more..."). Incidentally, that site cites rg-rb.de as its source, but I cannot find the image anywhere on that site. To the original poster: It seems you have gotten into some...difficulties at Commons for issues like this. Intelligentsium 18:42, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Files oldes as "+70" and from unknow author cannot be copyrighted.... --Fredy.00 (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


    Nonsence, study a copyright law --Fredy.00 (talk) 18:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fredy.00, the onus is on you to provide evidence that the copyright has expired. The website linked to (Russia Today) shows that the photo was sourced from Russkaja Germanija - which has a copyright over all content on their website. If it is indeed an Soviet Government photo (as it possibly is), then find the picture on the official Russian Government website, or the official Russian Army website - and then it may be suitable for upload to Commons, as being sourced from the Russian Government. Until such proof exists, the copyright would appear to belong to Russkaja Germanija - provide evidence to the contrary, otherwise copyright laws clearly show that this cannot be used. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 18:45, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Let me quote the conditions for the use of PD-Russia-2008:
    1. The author of this work died before June 22, 1941, or this work was originally published anonymously before this date and the name of the author did not become known before January 1, 1992.
    2. The author of this work died between June 22, 1941 and December 31, 1942 and did not work and also did not serve in the Army during the Great Patriotic War.[2]
    3. This work is shot from non-amateur cinema or television film or television broadcast, which was first shown more than 70 years ago (before January 1, 1939).
    Which criteria do you think the picture would come under? -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 18:48, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    How do I undo a Wikibreak?

    I put permanent (expires in 7 millenia) wikibreak code on my account, and now want to undo it. I can't edit the page anonymously because it is a "user's" (mine) private setting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.11.116.212 (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Set the clock on your computer...erm...forward seven millenia? Intelligentsium 17:34, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess he refers to the Wikibreak Enforcer script. Since the script logs you out immediately after login, disable javascript in your browser before logging in, then you can edit your monobook.js to remove it without problems. Regards SoWhy 18:47, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I picture John Harvey Kellogg smiling at this. --Teratornis (talk) 05:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Pictures???

    I started a page for a book and found a picture of its cover at ar.wikisource,org - how would I use that image on a a page here at the English Wikipedia? I am beginning to read up on images in general, but these seems way over my head. This is the link: Muqaddimah. Thanks in advance. Supertouch (talk) 19:16, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    I believe the only way to use the file here is to upload it either to Wikipedia or Commons. TNXMan 19:17, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I thought that you couldn't upload a fair use image to Commons... And a book cover would be fair use, no? Dismas|(talk) 05:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    If it is "fair use" it can only be put on Wikipedia. However, as the above link no longer works, the point is moot. As I can't log in, I can't see the deletion log to find the reason.
    Incidently, it appears that the Arabic Wikisource is not part of the Unified login? Or would I have to type my user name and password in Arabic to log in? -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 09:55, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I just accessed http://ar.wikisource.org (note there is a punctuation error in the URL above) and it did autolog me in via SUL. – ukexpat (talk) 15:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    My bad - I just tried it and it worked for me too - I clicked on the wrong button before! With regard to the image, the Arabic Wikisource page lists it as PD - but it might be worthwhile checking that it would be PD under Commons/Wikipedia - It might also be worth asking at the equivalent to the Help Desk at ar.wikisource - the main Help Page appears to be at this location, but I can't read Arabic, so I can't help further. If the image is globally in the Public Domain, then it can be uploaded onto Commons with no problem -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 16:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Unable to retrieve password

    I recall setting up account jogrady a long time ago, but I have not been able to get into it for a long time. As a result I've had to set up this account. (jwogrady) I would much prefer to go back to account jogrady if at all possible.

    When I try to password reset account jogrady (without the w) it says there is no email address associated with the account. Is there another way to reset the password? If no, please verify the account is still active and unlocked so I can continue going through my historical password list.

    Thanks,

    John —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwogrady (talk • contribs) 20:56, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    The account has no deleted edits either. Accounts don't expire or get prevented from logging in so if you remember the password then it will still work. Accounts can get blocked from editing but it doesn't prevent logging in, and the account jogrady has never been blocked from anything. As PhantomSteve says, you can abandon it or try to usurp it. Either is fine by us. Creating a new account when the old has no edits is perfectly OK. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:29, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    For clarification: PrimeHunter is an admin on Wikipedia, so can see deleted contributions. As an ordinary editor, I cannot see delete contributions - hence why PrimeHunter could respond about those while I couldn't. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 09:51, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Non-Free Images and Userspace

    Is is OK to use a non free image (a book cover) to work on an article I'm currently working on in my sandbox? Eventually, it will be placed in the mainspace, but for now the only place the image will be used will be in my userspace. --Michaelkourlas (talk) 21:22, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    I suggest you wait until you move the article to regular space before uploading the image. You can put it in your sandbox but it can't stay there for too long (more than a month). ZooFari 21:29, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Non-free images used in any namespace other than main/article will get deleted by a bot within a few days.---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 21:39, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    That bot is inactive now. And it didn't just delete them as so, it had to list the images and notify the uploader under certain criteria. ZooFari 21:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    You can put the link in your sandbox article with a leading colon so that a link to the image appears but the image itself doesn't—e.g., [[:File:Example.jpg|thumb|250px|Caption]]. Then you just have to remove the first colon when you move or copy the article to mainspace. Technically, nonfree images should never be displayed in user space.Deor (talk) 01:03, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_South_Park_episodes#Season_4

    season 4 of this list is totally wrong, somebody might have vandelized the list at some point. I have the DVD set and I know the correct order they should be in but I don't know the original air-date. I have a online reference here for proof http://www.southparkstudios.com/guide/?season=4. Is it ok if I go ahead an fix this list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Epicnoob (talk • contribs) 21:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you for your suggestion regarding List of South Park episodes. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). --Mysdaao talk 22:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for helping, I noticed on the talk page of the list and it appears to be a issue that people are already aware of. I have left a comment their so I guess i'll just wait for a reply and that talk page. Sorry for wasting your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Epicnoob (talk • contribs) 21:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    There's no need to apologize. We're here to help if you need more assistance. --Mysdaao talk 22:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    November 16

    Security hole?

    I suspect that I have identified a security hole in Wikipedia. I hope I'm wrong, but if not, what's the best way to report it privately? Matchups 03:19, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    From http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Security: "If you have found or believe you have found a security bug in MediaWiki or on one of Wikimedia's web sites, please directly e-mail security@wikimedia.org with details.¶ We would be most happy to have a day or two to fix the problem and prepare a bug fix for third-party users before public disclosure, if possible." – Sswonk (talk) 03:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Dispute resolution question

    I seem to recall a part of the dispute resolution guidelines that mentioned something about when person C saw an edit war brewing between persons A and B, that they could list the page on some list and the article would be locked until a consensus could be reached. Does this ring any bells with anyone? The article that I want to call attention to is Cytherea (person). Thanks, Dismas|(talk) 05:25, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Personal Pages

    I am looking for a website to post my resume, can I post it under my name here on Wikipedia. For example I've considered starting it here C.Jones —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.14.177 (talk) 07:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    There are alternatives, see Wikipopuli and Wikibios. – ukexpat (talk) 15:58, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Please save Seongha Jeong

    No matter how much I (and some others) have thrown assertions and evidence of his notability onto Seongha's article, nobody who's inclined to keep the article is going to its AFD page.

    Can someone please do what it takes to improve the article enough for it to be kept? Thanks. --Let Us Update Special:Ancientpages. 09:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    I am going to respond at the AfD. Other editors may want to chime in on making the request here.Cptnono (talk) 09:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Two comments: firstly, this isn't really the place for seeking people to join in the AfD discussion - this Help Desk is for help with using Wikipedia. Secondly, the notability for this individual appears to be based on one article on a blog, and YouTube videos. I don't know about anyone else, but I will certainly pop over to the AfD and leave my comment - but it may not be what you are hoping for. (Notice that I say "may not" - I haven't looked up sources for myself yet, so it may be that I'll be pleasantly surprised. A quick search hasn't revealed anything yet) -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 09:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Remove Record From Special:Contributions

    Is it possible to remove the record in you user's Special:Contributions pages which says that you've made a particular edit on an article in Wikipedia from once you've made that edit? If so then, how? If not, then will it stay there forever?

    Bowei Huang (talk) 10:26, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    • Your contributions are generally there for ever! If there is a particular reason why you would not want a specific edit showing, for privacy reasons, there is a process called Oversight - read that article, which explains the process, as well as giving a link to the list of Oversighters. There has to be a very good reason for the removal of a particular edit from your contributions - for example "I made a silly comment" or "I was rude to someone" would not be sufficient - whereas something like "I put my telephone number on that talk page" would be, as this would be a privacy issue. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 10:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Citing old books, only have Library of Congress number

    Hi! I am trying to utilize a cite template in order to cite three very old books. I have found them on the Library of Congress' website. Is there a cite template available for this? Basket of Puppies 11:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Also, you can use {{LCC}} in the id= field.
    Example: * {{cite book |last1=Smith |first1=Fred |title= Olde books are good|edition=1st |year=1901|publisher=Smith and Co.|location=London|id={{LCC|A123.B45 C67 1901}}}} gives
    • Smith, Fred (1901). Olde books are good (1st ed.). London: Smith and Co. LCC A123.B45 C67 1901.
    Hope this helps -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 14:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Excellent. Thank you, Phantomsteve. BTW, do you know if a bot generates citation template exists for LoC numbers? Basket of Puppies 11:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't know of one, but that doesn't mean there isn't one! -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 13:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    User Page (2)

    I should like to remove some material from my user page. I get the following message--Sorry! We could not process your edit due to a loss of session data. Please try again. If it still does not work, try logging out and logging back in. I've tried that with no luck. What can I do, please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prmwp (talk • contribs) 14:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Normally it means exactly what it says. Please log in again. Alternatively, have you recently changed your browser so as to not retain cookies? Jan1naD (talk • contrib) 14:47, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I see you've now managed to do it. Jan1naD (talk • contrib) 14:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Done. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prmwp (talk • contribs) 14:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


    HELP Please

    I am attempting to create a new account in Wikipedia Bahasa Melayu (ms). It seems like all IPs from my school has been blocked. What happened to Wikipedia sysops there? 158.143.167.250 (talk) 16:02, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello. your question seems to be related to one of our sister projects. Please note that you are at the English Wikipedia, one of hundreds of projects hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation. Each project is operated independently of one another, including Wikipedias in other languages. This page is a help desk for asking questions related to using this wiki, so we may be unable to assist in matters concerning other Wikimedia projects. You may have more luck trying to find help at the project in question. Best of luck. --Mysdaao talk 17:18, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi. I wouldn't have turned here if I could leave a message there. As I said all the IPs from my school were blocked. Can someone help please? 158.143.167.250 (talk) 17:25, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    What would you have us do? We are completely independent from ms.wiki. I think you'll get much more useful reaction if you:
    (a) Re-read the block notice at ms.wiki, and follow the directions for requesting an unblock or creating an account. If it is similar to here, you may need to create it somewhere else, not at school
    (b) If for some reason that doesn't work, read the ms.wiki help documentation and find the equivalent of the {{helpme}} template, and use that on the IP's talk page.
    --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    table tennis

    whether failing to hit the ball while serving in ping pong will render the service wrong —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.151.184 (talk) 18:12, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    This page is for questions about using Wikipedia. Please consider asking this question at the Wikipedia:Reference desk. They specialize in knowledge questions and will try to answer any question in the universe (except how to use Wikipedia, since that is what this Help Desk is for). Just follow the link, select the relevant section, and ask away. You could always try searching Wikipedia for an article related to the topic you want to know more about. I hope this helps.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail Review 18:15, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Disputed fair use

    I have seen an article that uses an unfree image, with the requested non-free content rationale provided. However, I have reasons to believe that such rationale is incorrect (but only for that case; it is also used at other articles with the related rationales, and I don't dispute those others). Wich is the place or method to explain such things? MBelgrano (talk) 19:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    I would delete the image link from the relevant article and explain on the talk page why you have done so. – ukexpat (talk) 19:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Elisa22.jpg

    Hi all. Please take a look at this picture's page. Its uploader seems to have problems with copyrights as he often uploads foreign images and claims that he is the author. This picture seems to have the same story. I don't know what template should I insert in this picture's page (think a sort of {{di-no permission}}). So.. help? :) --Gikü (talk) 20:19, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    If you are certain that the the uploader is not the author, then it is likely a copyright violation, and you should request speedy deletion of the image with {{db-f9}}. The best way to be sure that the image is a copyright violation is by knowing the URL of the website that the image was taken from, so add the URL to the request by using {{db-f9|url=URL}} when you add it to the page. --Mysdaao talk 20:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Looks like a screencap to me and, if so, is a copyvio (not falling under WP:FU). – ukexpat (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Ok, I'll put my quest another way: how can I ask the uploader to demostrate he is the author? --Gikü (talk) 21:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Since vs. Since mine

    What is the difference between those tabs?Accdude92 (talk to me!) (sign) 20:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    The "since" and "since mine" tabs are features of Twinkle. When viewing a diff, "since" will show you the difference between the revision currently being looked at in history and the most recent version of the page, and "since mine" will show you the difference between the revision made from your last edit to the page and the current version. If you move your mouse over each tab, you'll its basic description. --Mysdaao talk 20:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    is twinkle to blame?

    Whenever I view the since mine of an article my computer goes really slow. My computer is an apple (school's so don't know what type.) It is also a desktop. i am using Firefox version 3.0.Accdude92 (talk to me!) (sign) 20:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    How to remove a re-direct

    Any article with the name "Goldscheider" automatically re-directs to Goldscheider ceramics. This is in principle wrong and unfair, as there are, and can be, other Goldscheider articles which should not be automatically re-directed just to Goldscheder ceramics. How can the re-direct be removed completely, please? Thanks Alexander Goldscheider —Preceding unsigned comment added by AGRR (talk • contribs) 20:54, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Just edit the page to turn it into a disambiguation page, modelled on one of the other "Family name" disam pages, and make sure it complies with WP:MOSDAB. – ukexpat (talk) 20:59, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Et voilà, you have Goldscheider as a surname dab page. BencherliteTalk 21:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    I attemped to update the external links for the "Lake Mattamuskeet" page, and now the external links have dissappeared. I moved to another computer and they still do not come up. How do I restore the box for external links. Thanks, Lewis Forrest —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lewis Forrest (talk • contribs) 21:12, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Should be OK now. You'd opened a references tag, but not closed it, which then swallowed everything afterwards. BencherliteTalk 21:18, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    (e/c)The page code was borked but has now been fixed. One point though, shouldn't the New Holland stuff be in its own article? And please use edit summaries! Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 21:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Loan Enquiry

    Dear Sir/Madam,

    My name is Mario Turcarelli and I reside in Sydney Australia. I need to obtain a business loan of $650,000AUD to purchase a Franchise business in Australia. If you can help me; please contact me at <blanked> Kind Regards Mario —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.64.122.3 (talk) 21:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello. I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our roughly three million articles, and thought that we were directly affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is a help desk for asking questions related to using the encyclopedia. Thus, we have no inside track on the subject of your question. You can, however, search our vast catalogue of articles by typing a subject into the search field on the left hand side of your screen. If you cannot find what you are looking for, we have a reference desk, divided into various subject areas, where asking knowledge questions is welcome. Best of luck. TNXMan 21:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    How to sugest new photo names?

    I wanted to sugest a file name change for a photo that had a strange numerical name, and it said that I should use the

    format. Where would I enter this line? Would I click "edit" on the "Summary" section right below and enter it there, or is there something else I'm supposed to do? I'm new to editing, and I want to help contribute information, and also help to clean things up.

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&oldid=326230514"